Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 4/14

by: DavidNYC

Thu Apr 14, 2011 at 8:02 AM EDT


Senate:

FL-Sen: Dem Sen. Bill Nelson said he raised over $2 million in Q1 and would report somewhere between $4.5 and $5 million on hand. Republican Mike Haridopolos said he raised $2.6 million and would show $2.5 mil in the bank.

HI-Sen: So that weird SMS poll we showed you yesterday which only pitted Ed Case vs. Mufi Hannemann in a Dem primary had another, more useful component. They also included favorables for a whole host of Hawaii politicians. Mazie Hirono was best (62% fave), while Linda Lingle was worst (44% unfave). Click the link for the rest. (And no, we still don't know who SMS took this poll for. They're just saying it was a private client.)

MI-Sen: Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D) raised $1.2 million in Q1 and has $3 million on hand.

MO-Sen: Sen. Claire McCaskill (D) raised over $1 million in Q1 and has about $1.8 million on hand.

NM-Sen: Teabagging businessman Greg Sowards raised $150K in Q1... but it sounds like that's all his own money. The writeup is unclear, though - it's possible he raised $150K from outside sources and threw in an equal amount on his own.

NV-Sen: Wealthy Dem attorney Byron Georgiou raised $1.1 million in Q1, with $500K of that coming from his own pockets.

Gubernatorial:

ME-Gov: We previously mentioned a proposed constitutional amendment in Maine that would require gubernatorial candidates to receive 50% of the vote (a hurdle almost no one has reached in recent decades). That proposal just died in the state Senate, so it's basically dead for this term.

MT-Gov: Democratic state Sen. Larry Jent officially announced he is running for governor. He faces fellow state Sen. Dave Wanzenried in the primary. State AG Steve Bullock may also run.

House:

AZ-06: Ex-Rep. Matt Salmon, who served in a similar seat in the 1990s, says he's now thinking about running for Jeff Flake's open seat. Salmon previously said he was considering a run for governor.

CA-03: Dem Ami Bera, seeking a rematch against Dan Lungren, says he raised over $230K in Q1. If this haul only dates to the time of his official announcement (just two weeks before the end of the quarter), it's nothing short of un-fucking-believable. However, he gets a demerit for emailing me a press release without putting it on his website so that I can link to it directly. Boo!

CA-06: Activist Norman Solomon became the second Dem to file in Lynn Woolsey's district, in the event that she retires this cycle.

CT-05: Dem Dan Roberti, a 28-year-old public relations exec whose father Vincent was a state rep, officially announced his entrance into the race to succeed Chris Murphy. On the GOP side, businesswoman Lisa Wilson-Foley, who sought the Republican nomination for Lt. Gov. last year, also said she was getting in.

FL-22: Lois Frankel announced she raised $250K in Q1. Previously, we mentioned that fellow Dem "no not that" Patrick Murphy said he raised $350K.

IN-02: Dem Rep. Joe Donnelly announced he raised $363,288 in Q1, his best single quarter ever. Dude's not going down without a fight.

NM-01, NM-Sen: An unnamed advisor to state Auditor Hector Balderas says he won't seek Rep. Martin Heinrich's now-open House seat (something that insiders apparently were encouraging him to do, in the hopes of avoiding a contested primary). According to this advisor, Balderas is still considering a Senate run. Personally, I think it was a mistake for Balderas to say he was almost definitely going to run, only to be upstaged by Heinrich, who of course said he was actually going to run. I think Heinrich has the advantage in a primary, but Balderas needs a way to save face here if he doesn't want that fight any longer.

NY-19: Freshman GOPer Nan Hayworth announced she raised $330K in Q1 and has a similar amount on hand. Question of the day: Do you think Hayworth could get teabagged to death?

NY-26: Dem Kathy Hochul announced she raised $350K for the special election coming up on May 24th.

OR-01: It took a little time, but Dems are now finally drawing out the knives for Rep. David Wu in earnest. Oregon Labor Commissioner (an elected position) Brad Avakian is putting together a team of political advisors and is likely to challenge Wu in the Dem primary. Another Dem elected official, Portland Commissioner Dan Saltzman, also apparently became the first Democrat to openly call for regime change (though he says he isn't interested in running). All eyes will certainly be on Wu's fundraising report, due on Friday.

PA-07: Republican frosh Pat Meehan raised $325K in Q1.

WI-07: Former state Sen. Pat Kreitlow has formed an exploratory committee for a possible challenge to freshman GOP Rep. Sean Duffy. Kreitlow served a single term in the Senate after defeating a Republican incumbent, before losing in last year's red tide. This could be a pretty good get for us if he goes through with it (which seems likely, just reading this article).

Other Races:

NJ Lege: Johnny Longtorso has a good summary of the candidate filing for New Jersey's legislative races this November. Out of 120 seats, only four total are unopposed (though there may be signature challenges).

Suffolk Co. Exec.: Will seriously no one hire Rick Lazio? Perennially a contender for Saddest Sack of the Year, Lazio is apparently considering a run for Suffolk County Executive, now that the seat will be open in the wake of Steve Levy's unusual plea agreement with law enforcement (which involved him not seeking re-election).

Grab Bag:

Dark Money: Dems are finally starting to play catchup with the David Kochs of the world. Ali Lapp, a former DCCC official (and wife of one-time DCCC ED John Lapp) will head up a new "Super PAC" called the House Majority PAC. Such groups are actually not all that shadowy - they do have to disclose their donors. But they can raise and spend in unlimited amounts, and engage in direct "vote for/vote against" advocacy.

EMILY's List: EMILY announced four new GOP targets: Bob Dold (IL-10), Frank Guinta (NH-01), Adam Kinzinger (IL-11), and Steve Stivers (OH-15). The group only endorses women, and there are no declared Dems in any of these races yet, but I note with interest that they claim "there is major Democratic female talent waiting in the wings." In NH-01, they could be expecting a rematch from ex-Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, and I guesss maybe Debbie Halvorson in IL-11 and Mary Jo Kilroy in OH-15, but those seem very unlikely. Any ideas?

Redistricting Roundup:

Iowa: It looks like Iowa's new maps will indeed pass into law very shortly. A state Senate committee approved them unanimously, and now the full body is deliberating. The state House will take the issue up today. Republican Gov. Terry Branstad hasn't yet said whether he'll support the new plans, but it'd be pretty explosive if he nuked the maps in the face of widespread backing among legislators. This has all been a very interesting process to watch, especially since after the initial federal map threw both Republican congressmen together, it was easy to imagine that the GOP would want to go back to the drawing board. But the fear of the unknown has pushed politicians to accept what they have before them, rather than risk something worse.

Indiana: With the new GOP maps looking very much like reality (how Bobby Jindal must envy Mitch Daniels), the state legislator shuffle is set to begin. The AP notes that the new state House map "has three districts that put two current Republican legislators together, three districts with at least two Democrats and four districts with a Republican and a Democratic incumbent," which doesn't sound so bad, but Democrats point out that "five of their House members from Indianapolis were drawn into just two districts."

Michigan: The MI lege is about to start the redistricting process. State law says maps have to be drawn by Nov. 1st.

Texas: Republicans in the lege have introduced a bill that would require any new maps (or voter ID bills) to get litigated before a three-judge panel in D.C., rather than go through the DoJ for pre-clearance. Rick Perry apparently is already interested in this alternative. As I've speculated before, he may be hoping for a more favorable hearing from potentially conservative judges. However, I'll note that you can still sue even after the DoJ renders a pre-clearance decision, so I'm not sure why you wouldn't just take the (cheaper and easier) free shot first.

Also of note, the Latino civil rights group MALDEF released two proposals for nine majority-minority districts in Texas. (They deliberately did not offer a map that covered the entire state.) MALDEF is no random organization: They were part of the LULAC v. Perry litigation in 2006, in which the Supreme Court forced Texas to redistrict yet again because Tom DeLay's map had improperly diluted Hispanic voting strength.

Virginia: So what's going on with this supposed deal? In a rather public bit of horse-trading, Dems (who control the state Senate) and Republicans (who control the state House and the governor's mansion) agreed that each body would get to gerrymander itself (that sounds kind of dirty, huh?), and would also agree to an incumbent protection map for congress, which would of course lock in the GOP's 8-3 advantage. But now Republicans and Democrats have each produced separate federal maps, and they are quite different, with the Dems deliberately trying to create a second district likely to elect a minority.

The oddest part of this deal is that the legislative parts of the deal have already passed - the congressional map is now an entirely separate beast, which I don't really get, since they each seemed to constitute one leg of a three-legged stool. I guess that's why the Senate Dems felt free to reject the House's federal plan, which suggests that the agreement has fallen apart. But Republicans don't seem to be howling that the Dems have somehow reneged, so maybe we didn't understand this deal properly in the first place. In any event, we're very much at an impasse here, but sometimes these logjams break apart very abruptly (see Louisiana and Arkansas).

DavidNYC :: SSP Daily Digest: 4/14
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

What an absurd amount
of money raised by Haridopolos; especially when Florida donors know there are still two other major candidates likely to jump in. Luckily he'll have to spend most of it on astronomical primary, but still, the guys doing pretty well for someone whose been portrayed so badly on SSP. He could actually give Nelson a run for his money.  

Hm.
I've no doubt that this is going to be an expensive race and whereas good hair boy is still in office, I suspect that's making it a bit easier to raise funds.  I imagine his plan was to try and raise lots of $ up front to scare other people off (which won't work) and establish himself as the front runner (which he probably has done).
I do feel that Adam Hasser will be stronger in the general, but time will tell.

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

[ Parent ]
Virginia
Republicans aren't howling because they (and Ben Tribbett of Not Larry Sabato) think they have a good shot of taking over the Senate, and can then draw whatever maps they want (subject of course to the VRA).

when did the house pass the dem's gerrymander of the senate?
I thought they were still debating over it.

NC-06/NC-04

[ Parent ]
The legislative maps were passed and sent to McDonnell.
The Congressional map is a separate bill.

[ Parent ]
Or maybe
they know the Dem plan for the Congressional seats will fall flat no matter what.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
If SMS can be trusted
then it's time for Hirono to run for Senate.

The fact that they give Case 51/25 numbers makes me wonder, though.  I'm a little skeptical.


DCCC raises $19.6 million in its first quarter.
http://www.politico.com/news/s...
Wow, I received an email last night from them saying that they had huge news to announce in the morning.  I guess this was it.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


More:
Just as encouraging to Democrats: The DCCC's quarterly haul of $19.6 million is higher than the $17.2 million it raised in the first quarter of 2009, when Democrats held the House majority.


Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
First Obama numbers?
That's a huge sum. I wonder what the Republicans raised. And this is the sort of statement that we need more of from our congressional Democrats:

"Republicans' radical agenda to end Medicare and play chicken with a government shutdown, while protecting taxpayer giveaways for Big Oil, is turning off independent voters and energizing our Democratic supporters," Israel said in a statement. "As a result, the DCCC is back on sound financial footing and aggressively focused on holding Republicans accountable for their radical agenda."

Was that so hard?

Anyway, I wonder what the first Obama numbers will be like, whenever they are released. There's a lot less enthusiasm now, but I think that's more because of the length of time before the election. Even if there's not as much passion as there was in 2008, he should be fine, especially since the donor list is so huge. But when they do come out, they be so huge that they just shock the hell out of everyone? What sort of figure would accomplish that? Something like $85 million? $100 million? Part of me wants a truly ridiculous sum, say around $200 million, but I have a feeling that would both energize the other side more than it would make them feel weak and would make some on our side feel as if they didn't have to keep up the pace.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
Truth: Obama "enthusiasm" higher than at same point 4 years ago......
Obama was polling waaaaaay behind Hillary nationally and in the early caucus/primary states at this stage in 2007.  His "enthusiasm" was genuine but had a ceiling.

Now that he's the incumbent President of the United States, his enthusiasm already is higher than it was at the same point 4 years ago.

This is a mistake too many people make, that they compare Obama's position today against his position through 2008, which is not remotely apples-to-apples.  The proper comparison is 2007, when most Democrats were not yet paying close attention.

To say it's "early" is a huge understatement.

And the facxt we have an incumbent runnign for reelection actually makes it a given that Democrats will be slower to become active.  The absence of competition by itself delays voter interest.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Oh, and one more thing, re Obama's 2nd Q numbers......
Obviously Obama has no 1st Q numbers, filing on April 4th.

But his 2nd Q numbers will be huge because he gets all the low-hanging fruit.

Case in point:  I gave $1,000 the first day, April 4th.  I gave a little over that total, in many much smaller chunks over 15 months, in 2007-08.  This time I gave a bunch up front, and likely will give more later...but much later, not soon.

I expect 2nd Q numbers to be bigger than 3rd Q or 4th Q numbers.  Then in 2012 the 1st Q should be the biggest yet as the campaign goes into full swing and Democrats get pissed off at Republicans in their own primary fights bashing our man.  After that each quarter should haul in more than the one before.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Here is
The Democrats' proposal for Virginia: http://redistricting.dls.virgi...

for more election analysis, visit  http://frogandturtle.blogspot....




17, CA-06,  


Thanks for the link
I'm now working on getting that map transcribed into Dave's App. I've got it roughed in, but I've got three districts that are about 10k-15k under and three that are 10k-15k over.

That said, I'm really surprised by two elements of this map. One is that the Senate Democrats are apparently working under a different understanding of VRA requirements that I've been. Their 3rd is plurality white and their 4th is just barely majority black by total population and only plurality black by VAP. The second is that they seemed to have been overly kind to Hurt and Wolf. They left the Winchester area in the 10th and gave the 5th some of Chesterfield County, which seems counterproductive to ever regaining that seat.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.


[ Parent ]
NV-Sen
Berkley is in via Ralston:
http://politicalwire.com/archi...

NC-06/NC-04

the question is, what kind of state is Nevada at this point?
blue, purple or red?  the population influx and then its reversal, the inability to poll a large chunk of the population (casino workers who work odd shifts, etc) among other things shows that this is a difficult state to predict.  

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
Certainly not red.
Even in bad years, it's no redder than purple (the Dems held the State Senate last year in addition to Reid winning while Sandoval and Heck won).

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
And Dems held 4 of 6 statewide...
Constitutional offices. In what was supposed to be a "bad year for Dems", both Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto and Secretary of State Ross Miller won in blowouts. In addition, both Treasurer Kate Marshall and Controller Kim Wallin won their more heated battles (against well funded GOP opponents) by nearly 5% each.

So really, Nevada is becoming more of a Blue State. I'd color us Light Blue for now, but I'm feeling good about long term prospects.

Yes, Virginia, there ARE progressives in Nevada!
24, gay male, Democrat, NV-03 (or 04?)


[ Parent ]
Ross Miller
If Miller won in a blowout statewide in 2010, is Shelley Berkley really the top tier recruit for Senate?  

Hometown: PA-8, Currently: CA-30.
Alt. Delegate to the CA DEMs from the 41st Assembly District.


[ Parent ]
Ross Miller's opponent was a major joke.
He had a history of being physically abusive that got in the news.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Also true.
Rob Lauer is a violent, crazed egomaniac. However at one point, The R-J's "poll" had him within single digits and some folks in Carson City were wondering if Ross Miller really had something to worry about. At the very least, his blowout win last fall proved he has some sort of staying power in this state.

Btw, I've been hearing that Miller was never really interested in running for Senate... Because he may want to move to a new office in Carson come 2015. ;-)

Yes, Virginia, there ARE progressives in Nevada!
24, gay male, Democrat, NV-03 (or 04?)


[ Parent ]
That's what many DSCC folks...
Were thinking, which is why they went to Carson City in February to meet with Ross Miller and Catherine Cortez Masto... NOT with Shelley. It was quite clear they were looking for someone else to run. However considering Patty Murray's warm embrace this morning with her release, it sounds like they got a call from Papa Reid telling them to back off and let Shelley run. I'm glad Murray put a kibosh on that.

Of course, it also helps that recent DSCC polling seemed to confirm Mark Mellman's poll showing Shelley slightly ahead of Heller.

Yes, Virginia, there ARE progressives in Nevada!
24, gay male, Democrat, NV-03 (or 04?)


[ Parent ]
Whoa, what DSCC polling is THAT???!!! I don't see it in other comments here......
Where can I find a reference to that poll?

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10

[ Parent ]
Click on the second link...
For the Roll Call story. You'll find this...

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray told reporters Thursday morning at a briefing, "Shelley Berkley is running. ... Our polls show her up and winning."


Yes, Virginia, there ARE progressives in Nevada!
24, gay male, Democrat, NV-03 (or 04?)


[ Parent ]
Thanks, atd, I missed that! (nm)
nm

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10

[ Parent ]
NV-Sen: Shelley is in!
As usual, Ralston broke the news...

Rep. Shelley Berkley will run for US Senate, source close to her confirms.

Of this official announcement, but for several weeks all the chatter here has been about this. Really, it would have been shocking if Shelley had decided to give into DSCC pressure and NOT run. And btw, now that Shelley is in and she has Harry Reid's blessing, The DSCC would be wise to cancel any further meetings with Ross Miller and Catherine Cortez Masto. Neither of them will challenge her, and Byron Georgiou is running nothing but an insanely expensive vanity campaign.

Yes, Virginia, there ARE progressives in Nevada!
24, gay male, Democrat, NV-03 (or 04?)


So atdleft, are you running in '30
to succeed Shelley when she retires? ;)

[ Parent ]
Gov. Schweitzer has a badass way to veto bills he hates!
http://www.greatfallstribune.c...

More pics here:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/...

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


I really hope he runs for senate in 2014
Baucus seems to have permanently damaged his approvals and I know he would try to serve 3 more terms if he could, but our chances of holding that seat would be a lot stronger if he retired and Schweitzer ran.

NC-06/NC-04

[ Parent ]
i have said it before and i will say it again.
Schweitzer '16

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
no
he's not liberal enough for the national party, but he's perfect for Montana. Senate, definitely.

Would you want Jon Tester to run for Pres?


[ Parent ]
let us be xompletely honest
Obama is a liberal, but he is probably as liberal of a person that could be elected national. Obama is to the left of me, and Schweitzer may be a tidings to the right, but not much. Democrats being able to compete in rural areas, particularly in the West is important for maintaining governing majorities. And honestly, Schweitzer is not all that conservative of a Democrat at all. Tester would be alright, but vastly inferior from an electability standpoint. What issues do you see Schweitzer clashing so badly with national Democrats? Is he a Nancy Pelosi? No, her she wouldn't have a a snowball's chance in bell of winning nationally. It is very important that we as a party expand beyond being only an urbancentric party.  

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Obama and Schweitzer
I don't think Obama is all that liberal, but that's fine, because there's a helluva lot less space between someone like Nancy Pelosi and someone like Claire McCaskill than there is between someone like Paul Ryan and someone like Olympia Snowe. He's got enough that should please both the center-left and the left, at least when it comes to domestic policy.  I suspect someone further left--Sherrod Brown, perhaps--could be elected nationwide, but probably not right now.

As far as Schweitzer does, I've heard someone say he's much more of a populist than anything else. I don't know much about him, except that he's big on renewable energy and supposedly called for single payer. I'm not sure whether he'd be called a radical leftist for anything, but even if he were to openly campaign on single-payer health care or something like that, it wouldn't necessarily sink him. It depends on where the center is viewed years from now and how talented a politician he is.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
he is a populist.
But then again so am I. His nra backing is actually a plus for me, whereas it might draw a bit of a sneer from those on the left. But that kind of backing is what democrats should be looking for, as it makes it nearly impossible to paint his as an out of touch urban leftist elite. IMO He is our best bet in 2016.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Good points.
Someone like Schweitzer, or Ted Strickland, who has beyond the normal college education of a bachelor's and even a master's would be good. It's hard to paint someone as a hick when he or she has a PhD, and it's equally hard to paint someone who has the sort of folksy ways of Schweitzer as being a coastal elitist. So I think I agree with you there.

As far as guns and other touchy subjects, there's a world of difference between being in your face like a lot of the so-called gun nuts and being someone who voices support for gun rights. People like Tom Perriello or Gabby Giffords seem to have no problem getting the support of the Daily Kos crowd while being a lot more pro-gun than a lot of Democrats are. A lot of it is, I suspect, how you handle it, and if Schweitzer is as talented as people say he is, it shouldn't be that hard to split the difference between the two sides and end up being fine. The really extreme gun people won't ever vote for a Democrat, but the Carolyn McCarthy-types probably would vote for someone like Schweitzer, even if they held their noses a bit.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
He could get around that
Besides, Democrats as a whole are not that opposed to centrists being the nominee. If he won Iowa and New Hampshire (he's the type that could) he'd have momentum going into other states.

24, male, African-American, CA-24, Democrat. Chair of the SSP Black Caucus.

[ Parent ]
Schweitzer isn't too conservative
He's definitely no Max Baucus. He supports single payer, refused PAC money for his campaigns, and has been big on renewable energy, for example. Sure, he's pro-gun, but are there really that many people in the Democratic party for whom that's a deal-breaker? IMO, he's just conservative enough that he would appeal to many naturally Republican voters but liberal enough that many progressives (such as myself) would enthusiastically support him. I think he would actually be a great candidate with a strong chance of winning.  

Male, VA-08

[ Parent ]
I'm a fan
I'm a good deal more liberal than Schweitzer in many areas, but I'm a fan. Like many Democrats, I'm more concerned with someone who can win than someone who agrees with me on a laundry list of issues. He'd clean up in the West, too, turn Montana blue, keep Colorado, and make Arizona competitive.

And the branding thing--LOVE IT. And I say that as an urban liberal. Any ad man worth his salt could do a bang-up ad on that contrasting Romneybot's "branding" and Schweitzer's branding. He's like actual folksy instead of Palin-folksy.

Also, he speaks Arabic and spent some time in the Persian Gulf so he'd be hard to paint as a hayseed. I'm seeing a lot of positives and not a lot of negatives. His "liberal" positions are ones where liberal=popular and the lefty positions he shies away from are the less popular ones. Frankly, I'm cool with that, too. Let's play the game on the turf we can win, instead of being Republican-lite.

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
You forgot the best part...
he appears to support marriage equality! And that's actually pretty courageous since Montana voted something like 2-to-1 for a gay marriage ban in 2004.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
With this whole branding thing
I don't see any way he doesn't go national.

überliberal Democrat, male, OH-12 (college), NJ-09 ("home"), Mets, Jets

[ Parent ]
The problem is that
while national and Beltway observers love Schweitzer, Schweitzer doesn't seem as if he returns the favor.  Can't imagine he will pick up and move to DC any time soon, either for private sector work or as a senator.

[ Parent ]
Jesus, how is that
How is that a problem? The fact that he hates the Beltway media makes me swoon. The Beltway media makes the rest of the media look sage, clear-eyed and credible.If only a certain President would tell the Beltway media to eff off. Sigh...a boy can dream.

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.

[ Parent ]
People seem to forget
he ran against Conrad Burns in 2000, losing by about 3%. He obviously had some level of desire to become a Senator. Plus he had a turn as head of the DGA, and spoke at the convention in 2008. He definitely has a pretty fierce independent streak, but he's obviously interested in becoming a national political figure.

[ Parent ]
NV-02: Kirk Lippold is in?
Ralston is also tweeting that Kirk Lippold is set to announce his NV-02 candidacy today. This certainly makes the GOP primary there even more uncertain! You can look at this one of three ways:

1. Lippold splits the teabagger vote with Sharrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrron Angle, helping Brian Krolicki win in a crowded field.

2. Lippold splits the anti-Angle vote with Krolicki, Mark Amodei, and others, helping Sharrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrron win in a crowded field.

3. GOP voters desperate for "a change from the career politicians" are revolted enough by all the other choices to give Lippold a surprise win.

I guess it all really depends now on how hard Chuck Muth (Nevada's biggest "Tea Party, Inc." mouthpiece) pushes for him.

Yes, Virginia, there ARE progressives in Nevada!
24, gay male, Democrat, NV-03 (or 04?)


From Yesterday
Before anything else, I just wanted to comment on the Obama percentages in the new Indiana congressional districts. Some are of mindset that 2008 was almost too good to be true and that it's unlikely to be repeated again, yet I can't help but think that it might represent something closer to the new normal should Democrats choose to contest the state regularly. At worst, like I keep saying, there's clearly no huge aversion to Democrats. But seriously, the worst district in the state is now a 42.9 Obama district? If the Obama campaign contests the state again, I think they all but have to try for every congressional seat. No, it won't be easy, especially if there's an incumbent, and it won't be cheap, but the ability to flip two or three Republican held seats would be incredible. It'd get us that much closer to taking back the House.


"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

i think the same ...
everyone always assumes that there's some sort of "normal" w/ regard to partisan numbers, but the map is always fluid w/ some areas getting redder and some bluer, which is why very few presidential election maps look the same, and when you look at changes decade to decade, it's always quite different ..

good example of this is people assuming that 2004 numbers in CA are more "normal" than 2008 numbers, but there's a good chance many areas will be even better for Obama in 2012 than in 2008 ... (and probably the inverse in parts of the US south) ...

as far as IN, the GOP may have drawn something bordering on dummymander in several districts; they did the same thing w/ the 1980's map, I think (?) where by the end of the decade something like 8 out of 10 seats (?) had a Dem. representative ...


[ Parent ]
Which areas of the state
are getting so much redder, though, besides the App. South? I think it's hard to make any comparisons since there was no effort at all in 2004 and a lot of effort in 2008. It really is like two polar opposites being averaged.

As much as some of these areas might be moving away from us, if we can hold down the margins in some of them, we can probably win at least half of the time, assuming the year isn't awful, and then use the effects of incumbency to get reelected. And perhaps some of the movement can be halted or simply reversed, if those people get used to voting for a Democrat again.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
ok .. maybe it's only ..
the Appalachian south !  but the point is there's always movement somewhere ... we need to be able to better predict where the movement is coming in our favor and run candidates in those areas ... but agree with you that hard work effort can reverse or at least slow down trends ...

[ Parent ]
IA-03
Steve King is robocalling Democrats in the proposed third district. Could be just a head fake--I still assume Latham will move here to run against Boswell, leaving King the new IA-04, but maybe King hasn't ruled out moving to IA-03 himself.

I immediately imagined the robocall saying:
"Hello, this is Congressman Steve King.  Did you know that you Democrats are filthy, lying pigs who enable anchor babies?  This call paid for by Steve King for Congress Committee."

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Weird happening.
Hard to believe that King thinks he can have crossover appeal.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
By the way
what is your opinion on the redistricting plan?

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
I don't particularly like the maps
but I can see the argument that the next ones could be worse.

[ Parent ]
Could be evidence of great news
That Latham intends to not be a wimp and run where his home is, leaving King with the prospect of being Bob VdP to Latham's Terry Branstad.

Maybe not the best case scenario (which would be a sane Dem beating King in the red district), but three Dems plus Latham sounds great to me.


[ Parent ]
IL-10
I'm thinking possibly former State Rep. Julie Hamos, who lost to Dan Seals in 2010.

What!!!
You mean Seals is not going to make his perennial bi-annual bid for Congress!?

[ Parent ]
I'm so tired of seeing Dan Seals signs every two years.
He needs to give up. Dems have better candidates here. Haha I was especially tired of seeing his signs when my group of friends put 35 Seals signs on my lawn the week after the election in the dead of night as a joke :p It was a good prank.

I miss SSP. Republican, IL-10

[ Parent ]
After a certain point, you
have to wonder if it's you. In his case, it probably is. If he's really interested in public service, why not go to something smaller, like the statehouse or some local position, and then try again in a few years? The stink of losing so many times could wear off by then, and perhaps he'd run a better campaign.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Checking In from IL-10
Hamos was appointed IL Medicaid Director last year; I don't know if she'd be willing to give that up to run. One candidate has already formed an exploratory committee (MoveOn organzier Ilya Sherman); there are a ton of others who could get in the race for Team Blue.

[ Parent ]
AZ GOP caves to bitherism.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo...
Sad, sad, sad.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


And it's weirder than that (emphasis mine)
Senators accepted an amendment by Sen. Frank Antenori, R-Tucson, for alternative documents. Instead, a candidate could produce such documents as a baptismal or circumcision certificate or a hospital birth record.


Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
A bris certificate?
Yikes. I didn't even know such a thing existed! I wonder if I have one.... guess I'll have to ask my mom. Oy vey.

[ Parent ]
Am I missing something?
How does a baptism certificate prove you were born in this country?

Oh, wait, this seems like a move to prove he's not a Christian. Now I've got it.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
Eh, I doubt it
I don't have hard stats to point to, but I'd guess that about half of evangelicals don't practice infant baptism. At the very least, Baptists, Pentecostals (my tradition), and most non-denominationals - which are largely derived from those two traditions - don't. Instead we "dedicate" infants and then latter baptize where other traditions would do confirmation -- or even more so, with adult conversions. If a particular litmus test (lack of a childhood baptism certificate) would trip up a Southern Baptist from being "Christian", I don't think it would get used.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.

[ Parent ]
Malaprop alert (from the Iowa arcticle)
"Given the enormity of the situation and the length of time these districts will be in place, the governor is taking a careful, thoughtful approach before coming to a decision," Albrecht said.

Apparently Gov. Branstad (or at least his spokesman) feels that redistricting is a great moral evil.

28, Unenrolled, MA-08


smoke and mirrors
He signed the 1990s map that passed the legislature. He will do the same now.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
I heard vague rumors that IN Dem chief Dan Parker mentioned in a radio interview that the party may sue against the new state legislature maps
Supposedly on voting rights grounds, that is, the Dems would claim that the new maps are harmful to maintaining minority representation. However, I can't find anything to source this beyond an offhanded mention on Abdul Hakim-Shabazz's Indiana Barrister blog. I'll be keeping an eye out for any actual activity on this front.  

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

Also, after some worries about it
The Marion County Dems seem to be convinced there's little chance of Andre Carson losing in his redesigned district.

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

[ Parent ]
Is Carson's seat even VRA?
Hard to see the meat in their argument (if these rumors are true).

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Not the Congressional map
They're talking about the state House, and it's not hard to see their point, with places like Indianapolis being sliced up.  

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

[ Parent ]
Between this Dan Parker guy
Dan Coats, Dan Burton, and Mitch Daniels, I hereby proclaim Indiana to be "The Daniel State."

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Ohio
is "The Steve State"

23, liberal democrat, SSP Gay Caucus Majority Whip, IN-02 (home), IN-03 (birth), SC-03 (early childhood), IN-09 (college);   DKos: HoosierD42

[ Parent ]
The Donald, friends with "the blacks"
http://www.theatlanticwire.com...

Cue laugh track.

In a "Newsmax Exclusive"

on the May 15 episode of The Celebrity Apprentice, he'll be announcing a press conference to be held a few days later. And at that press conference, says Trump, he'll officially declare his intentions to run for president in 2012.

Run Donald, Run!

Despite recent speculation that all of Trump's birther talk might be alienating people of color, he confidently declared in an interview this morning: "I have a great relationship with the blacks, I've always had a great relationship with the blacks."

as noted dryly in the article:

And there's no quicker way to earn the goodwill of the black community than by referring to them as "the blacks."


There's a pretty decent rock band from North Carolina called Blacks
Maybe he's talking about them. But Trump has never really struck me as a big fan of noise rock, so I could be wrong.  

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

[ Parent ]
You like noise rock?
Wanna be best friends?

23, liberal democrat, SSP Gay Caucus Majority Whip, IN-02 (home), IN-03 (birth), SC-03 (early childhood), IN-09 (college);   DKos: HoosierD42

[ Parent ]
Sure!


Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

[ Parent ]
The Donald
Well, he could name Omarosa Manigault-Stallworth as his running mate, and that would solve any problem he has with 'the blacks'.  I really don't see a problem with saying 'black' instead of 'African American' but when you put 'the' in front of it, it does change it.
(Keep in mind, I'm from the Bahamas - if you refer to anyone there as African American they will get VERY offended).

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

[ Parent ]
He doesn't sound like he's being
overtly racist. You've got it right that putting a "the" in front of it makes it sound odd. He just sounds...very antiquated in his speech. He sounds like an old guy that refers to someone merely by their ethnicity--i.e. "I go to my Jew accountant for my taxes."  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Yep
I don't think Trump is the least bit racist; I think the only colour he cares about it green.  This just shows his lack of political experience and skills.
I can't imagine Trump winning the nomination, but I was initially glad to see him showing up because of his pushing the China issue, which I think needs to be part of the public discourse, but since he took this turn into talking about Obama's birth certificate, I've been less amused by it all.  My gut feeling, though, it that he is going to run.

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

[ Parent ]
It's very condescending
It's been my experience that anyone speaking in that manner is trying to convince people that they don't have race issues, when they really do.

24, male, African-American, CA-24, Democrat. Chair of the SSP Black Caucus.

[ Parent ]
Taegan
He referred later to the high level of support President Obama has among African-Americans saying "the numbers you cite are very, very frightening numbers."  

[ Parent ]
Indeed
Black Al Gore and Black John Kerry were certainly not surprised to also get 90%+ of The Blacks' vote.

But don't worry, everyone, I'm sure it's okay because some of his best friends are The Blacks.

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
You know
whenever someone makes a horribly homophobic remark and then blows it off with "I'm not homophobic, I have gay friends," I really just want to meet their gay friends and see how their relationship operates, and see if these supposed "gay friends" are actually on good terms with them. "Oh yeah, John! We go way back. Yeah he sometimes makes remarks comparing my relationship with my partner of 35 years to pedophilia and bestiality but he's a great guy, really."

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
This discussion sounds a lot like:
Archie Bunker (studying a sample voting ballot sent to his home): O'Grady, Goldberg, Giovanni, Johnson?... You got a Mick, a Hebe, a Wop, and an ordinary American!... That's what I'd call a balanced ticket!

[ Parent ]
I mean Trump's statement...
...not our discussion... Sorry, I'm tired today...

[ Parent ]
Iowa House and Senate approve maps
Lopsided votes in both chambers, only a handful of Republicans voted no.

Governor Branstad has three days to decide whether to sign or veto, says he's in no big hurry.


Didn't Lazio get nominated for a judgeship in the Bronx?
I thought that's how they managed to finagle him off the ballot to save face. Was the nomination a complete sham, just to get him off the ballot, or did he manage to lose that race too?

24, SSP Gay Caucus Policy Committee Chair, Western Democrat; CO-05 (home), CA-14 (law school)

LOL!
In NYS the only way for a candidate to get off the ballot after a certain amount of time is to die, move out of state or get nominated to run for judge. The nominations are made by Party Committees.

Lazio got nominated to run as the GOP candidate for Justice of the Supreme Court in the countywide seat in The Bronx. Needless to say The Bronx is an overwhelming Dem area where no Republican as even the slightest chance of winning.

The final results in that election was Edgar Walker (Dem) 132,816 votes, Rick Lazio (GOP) 20,341 and Thmoas Ognbene (Conservative) 3,793.

Ognebene was Paladino's original choice for LT Gov but he lost the GOP primary so they need a way to get him off the Paladino's Taxpayer line so they stuck him as the Conservative party candidate in this race.

Interesting side note the people who won Write-in votes in this judicial race include such luminaries as Hunter S Thompson, Alfred E Neuman, Immanuel Kant, Karl Marx, Lisa Murkowski (someone in the Bronx was watching Alaskan TV ads), a Mr. "Bull Shit!" and "Gay Marriage".

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
This is fucking funny
Thanks for this!

[ Parent ]
Wow, thanks!
I completely spaced thinking about party (since most judgeship races back home in CO are unopposed, and all are nonpartisan affairs).

From Congressman to failed Senate candidate to failed Gubernatorial primary candidate to failed state judgeship candidate. I haven't seen a nobody fall that hard in a long time.

24, SSP Gay Caucus Policy Committee Chair, Western Democrat; CO-05 (home), CA-14 (law school)


[ Parent ]
then you didn't
follow carol mosely braun very closely :P

18, Dem, CA-14 (home) CA-09 (college, next year). social libertarian, economic liberal, fiscal conservative.   Everybody should put age and CD here. :)

[ Parent ]
True
Senator to failed Pres primary to failed mayoral primary is pretty bad as well (esp. when you don't get out of the SINGLE DIGITS), but a state judgeship?? Jeez...

Trivia: I bet this is the only time in history that two people who have been nominated for major office have both run and lost in the SAME race for judgeship (even if it was just a sham).  

24, SSP Gay Caucus Policy Committee Chair, Western Democrat; CO-05 (home), CA-14 (law school)


[ Parent ]
Actually it was a county judgeship not a state one
Actually this kind of thing happens all the time in NYS.

They really need to fix the election laws in NYS to allow candidates to get off the ballot after the party primaries without going through this judicial nomination fraud.


Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
On a related note, CMB's supposedly in talks to become a CNN pundit
I caught her on AC360 two evenings ago discussing Obama's deficit speech with David Gergen and a conservative commentator.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
You know, there's a great sitcom/dramedy idea in here
A politician gets nominated to a judgeship, everyone expects him to lose in a landslide, but due to a last-minute scandal or something, he ends up winning. Cue wacky hijinks.

[ Parent ]
I hear
I hear Charlie Sheen is available. And the proper Hollywood term, for the record, is "Hijinks ensue."

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.

[ Parent ]
I believe that was the basis for Night Court
Check it out on Nick at Nite

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
It's a sham
just to get him off the ballot; they put him in a place where any Repub would have no chance of winning.

überliberal Democrat, male, OH-12 (college), NJ-09 ("home"), Mets, Jets

[ Parent ]
National numbers from PPP
Obama job approval 47-48, leads everybody by at least 5 points. I would note that the best Rasmussen can do is a tie with Huckabee. Next best is Romney, again down 5.

http://www.publicpolicypolling...


Undecideds
Are you worried about the undecideds? I could see a situation where they break against him, but I could also see a situation where a lot of people come back to him, especially if the economy improves.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Not particularly
Since I think the latter part of your statement is more likely than the former.

[ Parent ]
Senate Republicans Propose Taking Ax to Social Security
While it's not entirely clear how bad this Social Security proposal is compared to Ryan's plan for Medicare and Medicaid, it's still ballsy to propose reducing benefits for people who aren't making all that much to begin with. Will it hurt them a lot? I could easily imagine that being the case.

It's almost as if the Republicans in the House decided to help the Democrats with one entitlement and the Republicans in the Senate decided to help the Democrats with the others, without a care in the world about how it might affect them. It probably wouldn't hurt someone like Lee, but if Lindsey Graham is the Republican candidate in 2014, wouldn't he vulnerable to attacks on this?

http://motherjones.com/politic...

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


I'm starting to think Demint's brain has no grounding in reality.
http://politicalwire.com/archi...

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


Then again, it could be hot air all over again.
He theatened to have the START treaty be read on the Senate floor, but was pushed by the GOP to shelve that idea.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Well, on the other hand,
perhaps he feels that he has the ability to take positions like this since it's never going to come to that.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Patty Murray and Texas
In the article from Roll Coll where she describes the supposed changing forecast for Democrats in 2012, I noticed three things. First, when talking about vulnerable seats, she only mentioned those in Missouri, Florida, Nebraska, and Montana. If there was some sort of slip here, it's interesting she left off the seat in Virginia and Ohio in particular, but also supposedly vulnerable seats in New Jersey and Michigan. If it meant nothing, which is probably the case, then fine, but perhaps she thinks those are the four most vulnerable seats. Second, there was some hilarious spin from the Republicans that Democrats will be sunk by their extreme rhetoric, which indicates they are desperate, in red states next year, in addition to the supposed notion they are happy to run on the Ryan plan. If they are, I am more than happy to let them. They will probably suffer badly for it, to put it kindly.

But most interesting of all is her Six in '12 campaign. She claims she is aggressively targeting Republican held seats. It's no surprise she is going after those in Nevada and Massachusetts, nor is it shocking that she will go after those in Indiana, Maine, or Arizona. But she also mentions Texas, while neglecting to mention anything about Tennessee. (It's not surprising she mentioned nothing about Wyoming, Mississippi, or Utah.) There could be any number of reasons behind this, but here is what I suspect:

1. She tried to get Bresden to jump in but was turned down, or at best he's being difficult. And since there's no obvious candidate, she's putting it on the back burner for now.

2. There's some movement in Texas that nobody is talking about. I'm not sure what this could be. Perhaps some candidate nobody is thinking about will jump in, or perhaps there's polling indicating someone like John Sharp is in a lot better shape than people might imagine. Maybe it's got something to do with mobilization efforts being formed.

3. She's gotten word that Obama will indeed contest the state. This is in some ways connected to my previous comment, but if true, it's huge in its own right. It gives the candidate a boost that he or she would be unable to provide on his own.

If I had to guess, I'd say the last is the most likely. I could see how she'd want to roll the dice on demographic trends that our side could exploit, but like I said, it's hard to do that much work on your own, unless you are going to self-fund in a serious way. And it's easier to do that with a well known figure, who is popular in non-white communities, leading the top of the ticket.

On a related note, nothing about North Dakota?

Any thoughts?

http://www.rollcall.com/news/m...


"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


The omissions were no accident.
OH, NJ, and MI are is good shape for us at the moment.  No major challengers have emerged and Obama will contest the states and have coattails in most of them.  I suspect that the same feeling goes with VA.

Too bad about Bredsen, but not a surprise, really...

Contesting Texas?  That could turn out to be interesting, but boy will it be expensive to operate a GOTV network out there.  I would normally be very suspicious of such an effort, but Plouffe was very bullish about Florida in 2008 when I thought that Florida was fools gold for us.  So, he knows better than I do.  It would be nice to force the GOP to spend money there, though.


[ Parent ]
oops, typo..
replace "are is" with "are in pretty good shape for us, at least for the moment."

[ Parent ]
As expensive
as it would be for Obama, it'd be even worse for a Senate candidate that would widely, and correctly, viewed as an underdog. But at the same time, Obama can probably afford it, if for no other reason than his fund raising should be as strong if not stronger than last time and he has his previous work in other states to build on, the savings from which could be used in other states. It makes sense that they wouldn't try it if they weren't going to be supported by a presidential campaign. The fact that indicating they will makes me think the presidential campaign will be there. Whether it will do good things remains to be seen, but regardless, I think it will be there. And to that, I and Tobias Fünke say, "HUZZAH!" I just hope we learn more sooner rather than later. Probably never too early to get to work there, you know?

As for Tennessee, I wouldn't be worried...yet. There's still plenty of time to find someone.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
Not worried about TN...
But, realistically, Bredsen was the only candidate that had a shot with Obama on the ballot (unless there is a super-mega wave against the GOP--and I still don't think that TN would be affected by such a wave).

[ Parent ]
It'd still be nice to compete.
I am not sure Obama would hurt him in the state. I'm trying to think of a race where a national candidate hurt a statewide candidate. Maybe there are a lot of examples, but none are coming to mind. Granted, Tennessee is a pretty Republican state these days, but even so, I expect him to help far more than he would hurt, based on the sizable black population in the state and because he clearly didn't maximize turn out last time by not competing at all. It seems entirely possible that he could get to 46 percent in the state if the year is decent enough. If that were to happen, it's not ridiculous to think that the Democratic candidate could exceed that.

And if we actually tried to compete but fell short? Well, if the Democratic candidate managed a respectable performance, we'd have a potential future candidate on our hands. That's never a bad thing.

Will Obama compete in Tennessee? Probably not. I don't see it happening unless the candidate is truly a non-starter and/or the money is coming even better than expected--basically, the sort of conditions where he'd compete in pretty much any state for the sole purpose of party building.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
Interesting
I find it interesting that every single one of you misspelled Bredesen.  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.

[ Parent ]
That would certainly explain
why it was so damn hard for me to find news articles on him when I recently did a search.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Bredesen
I will be overjoyed if he runs. Not only is he the only viable candidate for statewide office anymore in Tennessee for the Democrats, but he'd totally cream Bob Corker. The only problem I see is that Bredesen is arguable more conservative that Corker, and losing Corker would suck simply because he is one of the few Republicans willing to work with us nowadays.

That being said, give up on it. He isn't running.  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.


[ Parent ]
*
Than* not that.


21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.

[ Parent ]
How interesting.
Why would he cream Corker so easily? If he's actually more conservative, why not run as a Republican? It doesn't seem like an asset to have a D next to your name in Tennessee.

And as nice as it is that Corker is willing to govern instead of grandstand, that doesn't much of anything if he's going to vote with us less than Breseden probably will. As reasonable as he is, he's still a Republican. He's still going to vote for Mitch McConnell as Majority Leader and still vote against most if not all of our agenda. Breseden might be a pain in the ass on a few things, perhaps even worse than a Nelson or a Manchin, but he will vote for Reid as Majority Leader if nothing else. That alone is worth a lot.

And give what up? I haven't been discussing him frequently. I don't get this comment.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
.
http://www.swingstateproject.c...

The race, according to PPP, is a toss-up with Bredesen in the lead. That margin would grow as the campaign wore on.  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.


[ Parent ]
We honestly have no idea
if that is true. It very well could be, but we don't know. Chances are he might not run. So it probably doesn't matter, but he would at least cause Republicans unnecessary heartburn.

19, Self Appointed Chair of the SSP Gay Caucus (I claimed it first :p), male, Dem, IN-09 (College IN-09) (Raised IL-03, IL-09)

[ Parent ]
.
I meant the give up only in the context of the above. Bredesen would be less of an issue than Nelson or Manchin because he isn't as outspokenly conservative.  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.

[ Parent ]
You never
indicated why you feel he's more conservative than Corker. Is that why you feel he would cream Corker? If not, then why?  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Coattails
... Incumbents rarely have the same coattail effect that they did when they were first elected.  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.

[ Parent ]
If Obama spends in Texas ...
He should only burn the money on voter registration for a "long-term investment". Texas is far too expensive to hit with airwaves for the heck of it as it is a little big bigger than Montana.  

[ Parent ]
I agree.
Ads would have to be part of the equation, but the ratio should be more like 75/25, which I think it would be, if the campaign's previous actions are any indication.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
I can't fathom John Sharp performing any better than Bill White
Especially since none of the Republicans look like the second coming of Debra Medina. They're Tea Parties, but they're probably sane and gaffe-free at that. I think Ted Cruz and Michael Williams are wholly capable of garnering upwards of 60 percent of the vote. If a moderate like Tom Leppert or Roger Williams wins, you're probably looking at 65 percent and up.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
Cornyn
was only able to get about 55 percent of the vote in his two races (which did, to be fair, have third-party candidate skewing the percentages down), and he was elected statewide a few times before to higher positions than almost any of these guys besides David Dewhurst. (Yes, Michael Williams was elected statewide, but the Railroad Commission is not the same as being elected Attorney General.) It's entirely possible that they could do as well as you describe, but it's far from guaranteed, particularly if the Democratic candidate campaigns vigorously and/or has the support of the national party.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
.
The Democrat is not going to win. It doesn't matter who it is.  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.

[ Parent ]
I disagree.
But even if you feel the Republican candidate is bound to win, there's no reason at this point in the game to think these guys are all but guaranteed to get 60 percent when an incumbent senator and former state attorney general couldn't do that.

And I was going to mention this tomorrow, but I will do it then as well as now: a National Journal blog mentioned Patty Murray saying the Democrats have a candidate identified in the state. It didn't say who, but it contrast to what I was thinking a few weeks ago, it looks like they are rolling them out once a week. Perhaps we will find out in the next week or two, considering they've already gone through the most obvious ones and considering that in the three of the other remaining states--Arizona, Massachusetts, and Maine--there's no reason to announce now. Maybe Indiana will be the subject of the next official announcement, but I wouldn't be surprised to see Texas after that.

http://hotlineoncall.nationalj...

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
Ugh.
I never said anything about some mythical 60% landslide threshold that the Republican would have to cross. It doesn't matter if the Republican wins with 50% or with 80%. A win is a win, and the Republican is going to win unless these three things happen:

1) Obama contests the state.

2) Minorities begin voting at the same rates as whites. The easiest way to accomplish this is to nominate a minority candidate. Obama will already energize the black vote, so a Hispanic would be the best option.

3) Nominate someone who appeals to moderate white suburbanites so that we can get to at least 35% of the white vote. The easiest way to accomplish this is to nominate a moderate white person.

Do you see the problem that I see?  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.


[ Parent ]
My comments on the
 60-percent barrier were in response to andyroo, not you. He was the one who described margins that seem a little too optimistic at this point in time.

Anyway, I see the problem with the scenario you sketched out, but I think you are making it out to be harder than it is. Minorities don't need to vote at exactly the same rate as whites. Of course, if they did, it'd certainly make it easier for us, but it's not an absolute necessity. We simply need a small increase (more on that in a second).

As far as the white vote goes, in a state that big, you could probably white enough white liberals or moderate swing voters to get you over the hump. He already got 26 percent in 2008, compared to Kerry's 25 percent in 2004, and that's our floor. Does it really seem that outrageous for him to work hard to increase his total just a little? In percentage terms, it seems kind of simple. In absolute terms? Well, there were about 5,100,000 white voters, or 63 percent, in the 2008 electorate. Obama received 26 percent of the white vote, or about 1,326,000 votes. He had received 30 percent, he would have 1,530,000 white votes total. The difference is 204,000 votes. Could a Democrat find that many voters between Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, and Austin? I would think so. Of course, we will probably need more than that, but 35 percent is more than enough. If any Democratic candidate is getting that much of the white vote, they are probably winning the state fairly easily.

But back to the non-white vote. Obama will clean up amongst the black voters, obviously, but he'd need to slightly better amongst Hispanic voters. Let's say that the electorate was 60/23/13/2/2. (I don't think such a decrease in the percentage of the white electorate and the concurrent increase in the Hispanic electorate is unrealistic, nor do I think it's outrageous to suggest that a Republican without the recent record on immigration like McCain would lose more of their votes to Obama.) Were he to get 30 percent of the white vote, 98 percent of the black vote, 70 percent of the Hispanic vote, and 65 percent of the rest of the vote, he'd be at 49.44 percent of the vote. If that's not enough for a win--if there aren't any third-party candidates or something--it's close enough so that a small increase in either the white vote or that four percent that is made up of Asians and others would push him over 50.

That's a minor win, but it's still a win. And if Obama's winning the state, the Democratic candidate running is probably winning, too.

Again, none of this is very likely, but it's certainly not the impossible climb some make it out to be.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
White Liberals
The only white liberals are in Austin. Literally every single other white person in the great state of Texas is either moderate or conservative.

Democrats are never going to squeeze a higher percentage out of the Austin area simply because they've hit a legitimate ceiling.

Democrats can get better margins in Houston, San Antonio, and Dallas. The problem is that those voters are probably going to be minority, not white. While in the long-term bringing minority voters into the system and socializing them into voting is good for the Democratic party, in the short term it doesn't do very much for us. It simply shrinks the margin that the Republican wins by.

Do you really think that if Noriega couldn't it in 2008 with record level minority turnout that some mystery candidate can do it in 2012? The problem with this assumption is that Obama is horribly unpopular with Texas's white population. I really anticipate him getting a smaller share of the white vote in 2012 than he did in 2008. That alone will doom any Senate candidate.  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.


[ Parent ]
*
The margins I speak of in par. 2 are state-wide, not county specific (somewhat obviously, but still ambiguous).

Insert "do" after couldn't in par. 3.  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.


[ Parent ]
Once again, I disagree.
Perhaps there aren't that many white liberals left in the state. But that's why I said white liberals and moderates. I'm thinking of both the remaining voters in Austin (more on that in a second) and those scattered around the state. We aren't talking about a huge number of people, in either percentage or absolute terms. It is, as you know, a massive state, and considering the sheer number of white voters that aren't registered and/or are registered but don't show up, I find it hard to believe the Democrats could manage to make up the difference to get to 30 or 31 percent. It wouldn't be easy, but it doesn't look that hard.

Maybe they are tapped out in Travis County, but it doesn't seem that way from a glance at the numbers. In 2004, Kerry managed 197,235 votes, but in 2008, Obama managed 254,017 votes. Compare that to Bush in 2004 at 147,885 votes and McCain in 2008 at 136,981 votes. There was a clear increase, and not all of it came at the expense of McCain. But are there more voters left? Well, there are about 1,025,000 people in Travis County, and according to the Census about 76 percent of them are over the age of 18. That's 779,900 people. Figure that five percent of them can't vote for some reason (that's probably too high, but better to be too cautious than the other way around). That's about 740,000 people that could vote. Yet, between Obama, McCain, and the third party candidates, only about 391,000 people could vote. That's a difference of about 349,000 people. Granted, it's absurd to suggest we can get every last voter to go for us, but surely it doesn't seem ridiculous to think we could wring 50,000 more voters out of that county alone.

I would probably agree that most of the growth in the bigger areas will come from minorities, but again, I don't think it's ridiculous to suggest we can add more white voters, too. There are 600,000 unregistered voters in Houston alone. (At least there were when Fred Lewis tried to register them through Houston Votes. Even if that margin has decreased somewhat, it's still huge.) Why is it so hard to think we could add 100,000 white voters from that city?

As for Noriega, two things. First, I consider his performance to be a reason why the Democrats should contest the state. He's a guy who raised a quarter of what Cornyn raised, probably received next to no support from the national party or the Obama campaign, and was a relatively unknown figure around the state, and despite all that, against an incumbent, he managed 43 percent of the vote. No, that's not great, but considering the obstacles he was up against, that's not bad. Perhaps he wouldn't have won even if we contested the state, but we can't be sure of that. I would be surprised if he hadn't gotten a lot closer. Second, was there really record minority turnout? Well, maybe it was higher than it ever was, but it was still pretty low. Whites were 66 percent in 2004, but 63 percent in 2008; blacks were 12 then 13 percent; Asians and others went from three to four percent; and Hispanics went from 20 to...20 percent. (That is, if the exit polls are mostly right; CNN has the 2004 exit polls percentages adding up to 101 percent.) A lot of the growth seemed to come merely from non-whites that voted for Bush in 2004 but switched to Obama in 2008, people that were already voting as opposed to new voters. As I illustrated above, a small increase in the overall percentage of Hispanic voters and a slightly larger increase in their preference for Democrats gives Obama, and the senate candidate, a huge leg up.

Maybe there are a lot of white people that will just never vote for Obama or any Democrat for some time to come, but there looks to be a floor no matter what candidate we put up in the state. I'm not sure why Obama would go below what Kerry received in 2004, when a home state candidate was on the ballot. In fact, as I indicated above, the increase in the white vote necessary to hold down the margins is minor compared to the population of the state, and merely showing up to target voters is bound to take care of a large part of the margin.

By the way, when PPP polled this back in January, his percentages of the white vote against Gingrich, Huckabee, Palin, Romney, and Perry were 29, 26, 31, 27, and 31 percent, respectively. Maybe there was something off with this poll--it looks like he was losing far too much of the black vote, especially to Huckabee--but it doesn't seem that odd to think he could do well.

http://publicpolicypolling.blo...

 

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
This was probably posted already but I'm gonna post it anyway
PA Gov Corbett has only 34% approval rating and would lose a rematch to Onorato (It's like a broken record)

http://www.publicpolicypolling...

Can we declare the GOP governor class of 10' a failure now? it's been barley 100 days and no GOP governor with a trifecta has kept positive approval  


What makes
this even more awful for the Republicans is that it keeps some potentially interesting vice presidential candidates off the ballot, unless there's a magic rehabilitation over the course of the next year. You can go back and forth with how much these candidates matter in certain states, and I thought a lot of these guys were way overrated as options to begin with, but it wouldn't surprise me to see a popular Scott Walker add a point or two in Wisconsin. But he and many of the others in the states where Republicans are acting as lead boots to Republicans in more ways than one. Thanks, guys!

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Their voter model skews too heavily Dem, IMO
However, even if I tinker the model to a more modest D advantage and apply their crosstabs, Onorato still prevails by a point or two. Just not by their high single-digits.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
Oklahoma redistricting
http://www.newson6.com/story/1...

Virtually no change from the existing map, just smoothing out the population inequalities.


Kind of surprised
they didn't try even a little to give Boren the shaft. Could've sent him into the Tulsa burbs or something without looking messy at all. Then again the way he is he probably could've won anyway.  

20, Democrat, KY-01

[ Parent ]
He won by 14 points in 2010 when nearly every other Southern conservadem was getting annihilated
He's safe. With the way the state is going, they can just wait for him to retire and get an all-Republican delegation. Besides he pretty much is a Republican already.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Actually, had he faced a serious opponent, he would have lost.
His opponent raised a whopping $35k.

[ Parent ]
True
But he did a good deal better than Matheson, who also faced an underfunded opponent in a district with a nearly identical PVI, so Boren deserves some credit (blech).

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
You're basically asserting every possible serious opponent in his district...
decided they didn't want to have his seat.

No, the reality is not matter how serious his opponent, they knew they had virtually no chance against him so they didn't commit suicide.


[ Parent ]
Boren is such a DINO it doesn't really hurt them any.
Heck, the Republican leadership in Washington probably told them to let Boren be, since he votes with them so often he gives them "bipartisan" cover.

[ Parent ]
CA-06: Norman Solomon would make a great Congresscritter
A progressive since high school, and not afraid to be proud of it.

and in a safe district
too

18, Dem, CA-14 (home) CA-09 (college, next year). social libertarian, economic liberal, fiscal conservative.   Everybody should put age and CD here. :)

[ Parent ]
Yes, Nan Hayworth is a potential teabagging victim
Nan's people are said to be very concerned about newly-elected state senator Greg Ball primarying her. Ball was an announced candidate for the seat in 2010 but opted for a state senate race instead after two terms in the Assembly. He constantly sounds tea party themes and attends rallies to that effect, and recently hosted anti-Muslim committee hearings on homeland security - which is obviously more of a federal issue than a state jurisdiction. Chances are good that they'll be in the same district still, and Ball is a proven primary winner who works harder than Hayworth and possesses far greater charisma - as well as a decidedly unstable personality.

I think this threat accounts for her basically down-the-line GOP voting thus far in a district where Sue Kelly initially tacked centrist in the 1990s.  

29, Male, Dem, NY-20  


Ball won't want to give up his State Senate seat
In the closely divided NYS Senate Ball's 1 vote controls the balance of power. Without him playing ball the NYS Senate GOP cant run the show. If he wants Ball can be the NYS GOP's Tea Party Pedro Espada.

He's got way more power now in the closely divided State Senate then he would as a back bencher in congress.

I cant see him giving that up for a long shot chance at a house seat.

If he was still in the Assembly (where the GOP has zero power) or if the Dems retake the Senate I can see him trying for Congress.

But the way things are now I would be shocked to see him give up his State Senate seat.



Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
MT-Sen: Tester raises nearly $1.2 million in the first quarter.
http://www.greatfallstribune.c...

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


More:
http://www.rollcall.com/news/t...

Also, a video of the famous veto-branding event performed by Governor Schweitzer.


Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
He's certainly one to watch
Don't know who else can fire up the Democratic base as well while coming off as so authentically folksy and rural in this day and age.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

[ Parent ]
He's awesome
I really hold no hope for Obama on environmental and energy policy. Schweitzer is as far left as you can go on both and comes off as folksy and rural to boot. He really could win and then enact some great liberal energy reform.

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.

[ Parent ]
If I ever got into Democratic communications...
I would probably crawl through a pit of snakes to ensure that he gets the presidential nomination in 2016. And then I would crawl through another pit of snakes to ensure that Sen. Gillibrand gets the veep slot.

The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that there could be no possible better Democratic ticket either on policy or on electability.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


[ Parent ]
Gillibrand
I love her, but such a ticket would be totally dominated by domestic issue and would leave the Republicans an opportunity to hit us on foreign affairs.

I'd rather see Mark Warner as the veep. Gillibrand is young enough to wait another four or eight years to get the top spot.  

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.


[ Parent ]
Boehner fundraising
Boehner has raised more than $4.8 million in the first quarter.

http://www.politico.com/news/s...


Boehner
Is that the most raised so far for the 1st quarter? Most of the Senate candidates who did well have been in the 1 million - 2 million range.  

[ Parent ]
Good to see Commissioner Avakian laying the groundwork
I would have preferred Bonamici, I think, but Commissioner Avakian is a nice guy, he's senior to her in the Oregon political hierarchy (Bonamici succeeded him in the Oregon Senate when he left office to become labor commissioner), and he's a good progressive Democrat who cares about his community. I noticed someone concern-trolling the comments section at the link about how he's too liberal and Columbia County won't vote for him (the bigger concern is Yamhill County, as I fail to see how a Democrat who isn't totally asleep at the wheel loses Columbia County next year), but seriously, if Rep. Wu could win in 2004 (against qualified, moderate Goli Ameri, running against the "October surprise" of sexual assault allegations) and 2010 (against somewhat less moderate but highly touted Rob Cornilles, running against his own bizarre and unprofessional behavior on the campaign trail), the preternaturally level-headed Avakian will probably beat the pants off whichever ambitious young Republican sacrifices him- or herself on the altar of blue-enough northwestern Oregon.

The other news that really strikes me is the raw deal Democrats appear to be getting with these Indiana maps. Not tons to say except for how unpleasant that Democrats are getting two Obama districts out of nine in a state that went for the now-president in 2008. Fortunately, it appears to have some dummymander potential, which would be positively delightful.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox