Google Ads


Site Stats

The Rise and Fall of the South Carolina Democratic Party

by: Inoljt

Wed Mar 09, 2011 at 8:29 PM EST


In my research on South Carolina's 2010 gubernatorial election, I came upon a fascinating chart. The chart describes the number of Democrats and Republican in South Carolina's State House of Representatives from the Civil War to the present day. The data offers a fascinating story of the Democratic Party in South Carolina, and the Deep South in general.

Here is the story:

Inoljt :: The Rise and Fall of the South Carolina Democratic Party
Most individuals familiar with politics know the history of the Deep South: it seceded from the Union after President Abraham Lincoln was elected. In the resulting Civil War, it fought the hardest and suffered the most against Union forces.

Victorious Union forces were identified with the hated Republican Party, founded with the explicit goal of destroying the southern way of life by ending slavery.

Under military Union rule, the Republican Party flourished in South Carolina:

Photobucket

The Republican Party was the dominant political force during the Reconstruction era, as the graph above shows. During its reign in power, it enjoyed large majorities in the State House of Representatives. Its political base was the black vote, and it attempted to systemically ensure racial equality for blacks and whites. A number of blacks were elected to state and federal office; it's probable that many of the Republicans in the State House of Representatives were black.

This enraged whites in South Carolina. When President Rutherford Hayes ended Reconstruction and withdrew federal troops, they quickly gained control of South Carolina politics. The black vote was systemically crushed, and along with it the Republican Party.

This is reflected in the graph above. In 1874 there were 91 Republicans in the State House of Representatives. By 1878 there were only three left.

This led to the next stage of South Carolina politics, the Solid South:

Photobucket

Unfortunately, Wikipedia does not have data after 1880 and before 1902. After 1902, however, Democrats enjoyed literally absolute control of the State House of Representatives. For more than half-a-century, not a single Republican in South Carolina was elected to the State House of Representatives. Democrats regularly won over 95% of the popular vote in presidential elections.

That's a record on par with that of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union.

There are several reasons why this occurred. Democrats in South Carolina were strongest of all the Deep South states, because blacks were the majority of the population. Only Mississippi at the time also had a black-majority population.

This meant that in free and fair elections, blacks would actually have control of South Carolina politics. If a free and fair election took place in another Southern states, the Democratic Party would still probably have maintained power - since whites were a majority of the population. In fact, this is what happens in the South today, except that the roles of the two parties are switched.

This was not the case with South Carolina, and party elites were profoundly aware and afraid of this. Therefore the grip of the Democratic Party was tightest in South Carolina, of all the Solid South (South Carolina was the first state to secede from the Union for the same reason). Other Solid South states had more than zero Republicans in the state legislature. Republican presidential candidates might gain 20-40% of the vote, rather than less than 5%.

In black-majority South Carolina, the Republican Party was a far greater potential threat - and so the Democratic Party was extraordinarily judicious in repressing it.

Racism was a useful tool for South Carolina Democrats, and they were very proud racists. Controversial South Carolina Governor and Senator Benjamin Tillman, for instance, once stated that:

I have three daughters, but, so help me God, I had rather find either one of them killed by a tiger or a bear and gather up her bones and bury them, conscious that she had died in the purity of her maidenhood by a black fiend. The wild beast would only obey the instinct of nature, and we would hunt him down and kill him just as soon as possible.

Another time he commented:
Great God, that this proud government, the richest, most powerful on the  globe, should have been brought to so low a pass that a London Jew  should have been appointed its receiver to have charge of the treasury.

This was the Democratic Party of South Carolina during the Solid South.

At the end of the graph, notice that there is a little dip, just after the year 1962. This was in 1964, when the first Republican in more than half-a-century was elected to the South Carolina State House of Representatives.

He was not the last:

Photobucket

The year 1964 marked the day that Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson pushed through the 1964 Civil Rights Act, against enormous Southern Democratic opposition.

It also marked the beginning of the end of the South Carolina Democratic Party. The Democratic Party underwent a monumental shift, from a party of white elites to a party representing black interests. In the process South Carolina whites steadily began abandoning it.

At first the decline was gradual, as the graph shows. In 1980 there were 110 Democrats in the State House of Representatives and 14 Republicans. Throughout the 80s the Democratic majority steadily declined, but in 1992 there were still 84 Democrats to 40 Republicans.

Then came 1994 and the Gingrich Revolution. The seemingly large Democratic majority collapsed like the house-of-cards it was, as South Carolina whites finally started voting for Republican statewide candidates, decades after they started doing so for Republican presidential candidates. Republicans have retained control of the state chamber ever since.

Since then the Democratic Party has declined further in the State House of Representatives. As of 2010 the number of Democratic representatives is at a 134-year low. And the floor may not have been reached. There are still probably some conservative whites who vote Democratic statewide, when their political philosophy has far more in common with the Republican Party.

Nevertheless, the modern era in South Carolina politics is still shorter than the Solid South era. Here is the entire history of the State House of Representatives:

Photobucket

It's a fascinating graph, and it tells a lot about South Carolina and Deep South politics.

--Inoljt, http://mypolitikal.com/

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

That was "Pitchfork" Tillman-Not just
Senator Ben Tillman

You have a great deal of knowledge on SC.

I wonder if you know how many of the current SC democratic state senators & representatives are AA.  I have noted that VRA has the effect in the South of making the "white democrat" elected legislator a rarity in some states.  


Awesome Diary
This is a superb and highly informative diary. I had no idea that the Democrats literally shut-out the Republicans from the State House of Representatives for several decades! I wonder if any other Southern state was able to duplicate this feat? I know Tennessee didn't, as we always had a Republican dominated East Tennessee even at the height of Democratic dominance statewide.

Democrat: TN-8

My guess is that Mississippi, Georgia,
and Alabama came close. It's really not a record to be proud of though, because these "Democrats" were mostly Dixiecrat racists. They initially accomplished their dominance through the terrorist wing of their party: the KKK.  

[ Parent ]
Yep.
It kind of reminds me of the jokes here of how Hawaii's legislature only has one Republican.

Except it's not that funny in this situation.

http://mypolitikal.com/


[ Parent ]
Appalachian Highlands
Had no use for slavery or the Civil War and hence took on Republican party IDs.  TN02 actually has not elected a Democrat to Congress since before the Civil War.  Same reason NC and VA always had healthy Republican minorities.

[ Parent ]
One thing I wonder
is why this did not seem to be true in Western SC, which is also in the foothills. My suspicion is that the state government simply kept Republicans entirely off the ballot (probably explaining Al Smith's sweep of the state in 1928 when he barely won Alabama).

[ Parent ]
Interesting thing about SC
Well, mountain Republicanism really is in the mountains proper, not the foothills.  Piedmont areas actually tended to be the last area to realign.  The progression tends to be Mountains (1861) --> Cities (~1952) --> black belt (for whites) (~1964) --> Piedmont (1990s and 2000s).

Check out V.O. Key's Southern Politics.  It is one of the most awesomest poli sci books ever written, and it will tell you everything you ever wanted to know about, well, southern politics.


[ Parent ]
I personally
have a hard time considering much of happened between about 1880 and 1965 in the south to be democracy. When you systematically prohibit 20-60% of your state's adult population from voting because of the color of their skin, you don't have any republican legitimacy.

There was surely lots of politics, though.

(Of course, I accept that you could say roughly the same thing about the whole country before 1920).


[ Parent ]
Oh agreed
If I implied it was a democracy, I certainly didn't mean to.  And remember, a ton of poor whites were disenfranchised as well by literacy tests and poll taxes as well.  This has important implications for the South -- it is why the populist movement dies out in the late 1800s and why the economic conservative factions become dominant in the state parties.  It isn't accidental that Jim Crow really gets going after coalitions of blacks, Republicans, and poor farmers win a bunch of elections in the South in the 1880s.  Google "readjusters" for some interesting overlooked history.

[ Parent ]
Book you would love
Get Michael Dubin's "Party Control of the State Legislatures."  It is inexpensive, and is complete for all 50 states.

1902 to 1962 is truly amazing
Just wow I don't know what to say about that.  Not even a single person from the other party, any party!

Good Ol' Carolina
during reconstruction the South Carolina house of reps was all African American. Only after reconstruction were they all some how voted out. Even though South Carolina held a majority black population well into the 1950's.

It's not a mystery what happened
For a variety of political and legal reasons, the north was unable to continue civil rights enforcement. As a result, the redeemers were able to terrorize blacks and other Republican voters away from the polls.  

[ Parent ]
All African-American?
Wow, that's a surprise - although perhaps as surprising as finding out that there wasn't a single Republican state representative for more than half-a-century.

So technically, then, blacks had more of a voice in South Carolina's state government in 1870 than they do today.

http://mypolitikal.com/


[ Parent ]
I don't have the figures
but I rather doubt that it would have been entirely black. Remember that there were also "scalawags" and carpetbaggers!  

[ Parent ]
It wasn't
It may well have been that in dying days of reconstruction(1872-1876) they made up a majority of the Republican caucus, but whites monopolized the leadership positions.

That said they were important enough for Wade Hampton to go after during the 1876 gubernatorial election, with the Democrat promising to appoint a Black Supreme Court Justice, and to protect their right to vote.

An ironic echo of that promise is that at the Constitutional Convention in 1894 that disenfranchised African Americans two whites spoke out against Jim Crow. One of them was former Senator and Governor Wade Hampton. Of course the fans of Ben "Pitch Fork" Tillman didn't care what he had to say.

26 Right-leaning, Euro-Conservative, Anti-Tea Party Independent


[ Parent ]
Perspective
In 1876, 160,000 votes were cast in South Carolina for POTUS.  There would not be that many votes cast again until 1952.

Wow
That's a crazy statistic

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox