Google Ads


Site Stats

2010 SSP Election Prediction Contest: RESULTS!

by: jeffmd

Mon Dec 27, 2010 at 7:29 PM EST


We were going to wait for all results to be fully official before announcing our contest results (and awarding babka), but Joe "Norm Coleman" Miller seems to refuse to give it up (not even at the urging of Norm "Norm Coleman" Coleman).

Results were calculated as follows:

  • For the two-way races, we asked you for a winner and a margin. We take the difference of your predicted margin and the real margin (including third party candidates), and add that to your "regular" score.
  • For the three-way races, we asked you for the percentage each candidate was going to get. Again, we take the difference of your prediction and the actual percentage earned by the candidate, and add that to your "three-way" score.
  • Your total score is the sum of the "regular" and "three way" scores, with a lower score being better.
  • If you didn't enter a margin/vote percentage (or we couldn't understand what you entered), you got a "penalty" equal to the maximum score from a given race.

So a few summary statistics, by race:

  • CT-Gov: 69% of you correctly guessed that Dan Malloy would win. Average margin was Malloy by 1.52%.
  • OH-Gov: 57% of you correctly guessed that John Kasich would win. Average margin was Kasich by 1.53%.
  • OR-Gov: 90% of you correctly guessed that John Kitzhaber would win, on average by 3.39%.
  • CO-Sen: 57% of you correctly guessed that Michael Bennet would win. However, the average margin was Ken Buck by 0.40%
  • NV-Sen: 66% of you correctly guessed that Harry Reid would win, on average by 0.30%.
  • WI-Sen: 91% of you correctly guessed that Ron Johnson would win, on average by 5.17%.
  • FL-25: Only 47% of you guessed that David Rivera would win, but the average predicted margin was Rivera by 0.45%.
  • PA-07: 75% of you correctly guessed that Pat Meehan would win, by 2.96% on average.
  • VA-11: 79% of you guessed that Gerry Connolly would win, and correctly so; the average predicted margin was 2.81%.

In the three-way races:

  • MN-Gov: Average prediction was Dayton 44.45; Emmer 39.68; Horner 14.75.
  • AK-Sen: Average prediction was McAdams 31.88; Miller 33.36; Murkowski 33.62.

This could almost be a testament to the wisdom of crowds (...or alternatively, the central limit theorem) - as a collective whole, only one race would have been called incorrectly. If averages were an entry, it would have placed 21st.

So, of course, having done our best Census Bureau impression (at least we haven't congratulated ourselves excessively!) - who won?

itskevin, abgin, and UpstateNYer come on down! (And by "come on down", I mean "email DavidNYC with contact information" ...) Sidenote: remember, you had to have submitted your entries before 5pm EDT on Election Day - and had (and still have) a valid account at the time of announcement of contest.

Full results are available here. Thanks to everyone who participated!

If you didn't win, don't worry, there may or may not be a prediction contest for the Chicago mayoral race, too. I see David's babka and raise him one deep dish. That, or some dead fish wrapped in a copy of the Trib, depending on how we feel.  

jeffmd :: 2010 SSP Election Prediction Contest: RESULTS!
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Not bad for throwing a bunch of darts
along with my informed guesses. Congrats to the winners.

A request: would you guys mind adding a "rank" column to the far left? Thanks.


Not bad
Looks like I'm in about the 40th percentile, about. WI-Sen and VA-11 killed me in scoring.

Congrats to our three winners!

26, Male, Democrat, TX-26


Haha
I don't get a score. #VALUE FTW!

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


Heh, fixed.
Google Docs does NOT like =iferror(). My apologies.

[ Parent ]
feelin good
Even though I did poorly because I nailed a few races.  

Guess I'm getting better at this.
I was pretty good in the 2 way races - it was the 3 ways that killed me. Should've remembered that the large minority of voters who always vote for the MIP will put ANY Minnesota race within a gnat's wing between the two real candidates, even when one of them is an assclown of Emmer proportions. And I totally blew Alaska - believed the McAdams hype because I didn't think Murkowski could win a write-in campaign.

Oh well. Congrats to the people who owned.  


Alaska
I was actually preferring Miller to Murk (hey, if Alaska's gonna send a Republican to the Senate, let it be one who's gonna leave money for the rest of us). However, I have been very pleased with my new favorite Republican Senator. Do you all think her voting record since lameduck started is tenable, and what path does she take in 2016?

[A bit early, I know; but isn't that what we do here?]

überliberal Democrat, male, OH-12 (college), NJ-09 ("home"), Mets, Jets


[ Parent ]
I think she's reverting to form for previous R Alaska Senators
moderate R -- conservative to be sure, but unafraid to vote for pork -- like the voting record of her father and Ted Stevens, pre-2000, if I remember right.

[ Parent ]
I doubt it is.
I think she was just venting in the short term. As soon as the 112th is sworn in, she'll be back to her usual EPA-suing welfare-destroying self again. Her lameduck voting record was just a way of showing her appreciation to McConnell for so willingly throwing her under the bus as soon as Miller won the primary.

There's an off chance that she becomes the Joe Lieberman of the Republican party, but it's not bloody likely because the GOP actually has party discipline. And seeing as how Holy Joe is trying very hard to pretend he's a Democrat at the moment now that he's up for re-election, it's all entirely arbitrary anyway. Politicians will be politicians.  


[ Parent ]
Have they actually "enforced" their party discipline in the recent past?
Sure, there's always the threat of teabagging, but has any (relatively) moderate R member of Congress actually lost a position such as a committee membership / chairmanship because of their "moderation"?

The only example that comes to mind is David Drier, but that was not because of his voting record.


[ Parent ]
NJ Reps
from wiki:  In January 2001, Chris Smith became chairman of the Veterans' Affairs Committee and there pushed for policies opposed by the Republican leadership - which resulted in his losing the chairmanship in January 2005, two years short of the normal six-year term.

Marge Roukema was denied the chair of the Financial Services Committee, even though she was next in line, supposedly because of her moderation and constant bucking the party.  (She was a fierce critic of Gingrich).  They tried to make her Treasurer of the US, which basically just means you get your name on the money, and she refused.  

source:
http://womenincongress.house.g...

So there's two from 1 state in the last 10 years.


[ Parent ]
I appreciate the info, n/t


[ Parent ]
Roukema
I'm pretty sure a lot of the GOP leadership backed Garrett in his hostile takeover of the GOP nomination for that district in 2002. They essentially forced Roukema into retirement even though she wanted to run again and even though she was a better fit for the district. Now NJ-05 is stuck with Garrett, whose positions on most issues are slightly to the right of Kansas.

With that said, there seems to be much more collegiality at the Senate level. Guys like Voinovich and pre-party switch Specter could get away with the occasional moderate vote for years and still get plumb committee assignments. I think the Tea Party has changed all that - McConnell is clearly sweating their existence, or he wouldn't have immediately endorsed Miller. I also don't think Miller would've gotten the nod if it wasn't assumed by the Beltway that Murkowski couldn't win a write-in campaign. Look at the way McConnell reacted to Miller vs. his flat-out refusal to campaign against Reid (and for the similarly loopy Sharron Angle) in Nevada. Once again, it's how the rest of the country doesn't understand Alaska politics, but it's also nothing that bribing Murkowski with a seat on Appropriations couldn't solve.


[ Parent ]
Except that I see she's already ON Appropriations.
Whoops.  

[ Parent ]
Also, I think
Mathias was kept away from Appropriations or something like that because of his liberalism back in the 1980s.

18- Hamburg, Germany (non-US-citizen)

[ Parent ]
Oy
that's embarrassing...

NY-14, DC-AL (college) Distraught Mets fan

Congrats to the winners!
I'll be proud to have cracked the top 10%.  I did about that well in 2009: hopefully one year I'll get the babka!

21, male, CA-15 (home and voting there), LA-2 (college)



What exactly are the penalties?
A skipped answer or something?

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


Yes...
  • If you didn't enter a margin/vote percentage (or we couldn't understand what you entered), you got a "penalty" equal to the maximum score from a given race.


[ Parent ]
35
Out of 154. Pretty good. In the November 2009 contest, I did not do as well.  

for more election analysis, visit  http://frogandturtle.blogspot....




17, CA-06,  


I see two entries didn't improve my position!
Apologies for that. I didn't think the first effort had gone thru properly. Obviously it did.

Yikes, Alaska completely saved my ass
Without it, I'd have perhaps even fallen below the #100 mark. So, thanks, Lisa.  

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

consensus
The consensus forecast usually beats most of the individual forecasts whether people are looking at the economy, football, or anything else. The same thing happened here. The consensus would have been 21st out of 154.

41, Ind, CA-05

Oh I glad :)

My numbers finally work so well :)

Thank you :)


Great Job!


Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I don't even remember
what my calls were, just that I was essentially winging it. Still, I'll take it! :)

Scary...
that's what it felt like a lot of midterm voters were doing too.  :-\

[ Parent ]
#32 of 154 or so, that's not too bad.
Not too great either considering predicting elections is my hobby, but hey, everyone on SSP is a politics junkie, so what.

Looking at it, almost all of my error was contributed by FL-25 and MN-SEN. I was on-par with the top 5 on the other races, just that I thought that Garcia would be able to stem the tide and that I thought that Horner would get to 20 at Emmer's expense.

18- Hamburg, Germany (non-US-citizen)


MS party switches
These are noteworthy because they are the first in the MS legislature since the election.  I believe this ties the MS State Senate but that body is already run by a conservative coalition.

http://majorityinms.com/2010/1...

Libertarian secular Republican, MO-7


Technically
this flips the MS Senate as the Lt. Gov is a Republican but he was pretty much in charge before this anyway.

Libertarian secular Republican, MO-7

[ Parent ]
I am pleasantly surprised
I finished in the top third. After the election it felt like I called so many of those races wrong.

Johannes deserves a special shout-out--he did well in the SSP election prediction contest (17th out of more than 150 entries) and won the Bleeding Heartland contest even though it's been five years since he's lived in Iowa.


Wow!
Looks like Christmas came late this year, have to say I was pretty surprised at this. Pretty excited since I don't think I've ever had any babka

Meh…
43 isn't good but not horrible. Though I will brag about Hoosierdem's doomsday house predicts. I predicted 64 gone, we actually lost 63. Not babka worthy though. :( Congrats to all the winners!  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

suggestion...
I don't know if anyone ever suggested this, but maybe you should have a small penalty for picking the wrong winner.  When a race is supertight, you shouldn't get more credit for picking the loser by 2 than the winner by 3 or 4 in my opinion.  Maybe just a one point penalty.  It actually helped me that there was none, but it also surprised me that I was #28, because I knew I blew a couple of calls.

Nice
Beat the crowd, I'll take that.  


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox