Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 9/22 (Afternoon Edition)

by: Crisitunity

Wed Sep 22, 2010 at 4:42 PM EDT


AK-Sen: If anything makes clear the depth of the NRSC's change of allegiance from Lisa Murkowski to Joe Miller, check out the list of five different NRSC-organized, Senator-filled fundraisers that'll be held on Miller's behalf next week. Murkowski, meanwhile, is shrugging off the loss of her leadership post (which went to John Barrasso) and ranking committee position, seeming more focused on the mechanics of her write-in bid. She's going to have to do a little better than this, though (although Alaska doesn't require precise spelling of write-ins): the original version of the ad telling people about her write-in bid directed people to a URL that misspelled her name (LisaMurkwski.com). (I wonder if some cybersquatter has already grabbed that URL by now?)

AR-Sen: Ipsos, on behalf of Reuters, is out with a look at Arkansas, a Senate race that's hardly worth looking at anymore. Nevertheless, they show a closer race than anybody else has lately: Blanche Lincoln trails John Boozman by "only" 14, a 53-39 gap among LVs. Lincoln's favorables seem to be improving a bit too, but time's running out for a full-fledged comeback.

CO-Sen: Here's a tantalizing tidbit, although it doesn't have any bearing on the current race, just likely to exacerbate the seemingly-escalating war between the NRSC and Jim DeMint. It turns out the NRSC gave the maximum $42K to Jane Norton, just four days before the GOP primary. Not much of a vote of confidence in Ken Buck, is it?

NH-Sen: Unfortunately, where many Republican primaries have dissolved into acrimony afterwards, we're seeing lots of unity in New Hampshire. Ovide Lamontagne is helping to raise funds for narrow victor Kelly Ayotte at a DC fundraiser scheduled for Sep. 27.

WA-Sen: Considering the play this has gotten in the local press, this small comment on a parochial issue looks to be a major faceplant for Dino Rossi... he dared depart from the party line on the mighty Boeing. He suggested that Boeing should get no favorable treatment from the Pentagon in its competition with Airbus (whose efforts are subsidized by European governments) over who gets to build the next-generation Air Force tanker. (To put that in context, that would be like a candidate going to Iowa and dissing ethanol, or going to West Virginia and dissing coal.) Boeing had already explicitly endorsed Patty Murray, but now she has a nuclear-grade weapon to use against Rossi in the Boeing-dependent swingy suburbs.

And here's a hat tip to Horsesass's Goldy, who spots some interesting details in the fine print of that Elway Poll from last week. People were surprised when that CNN/Time poll found a reverse enthusiasm gap for the Dems in Washington (with Murray faring better among LVs than RVs), but Elway actually shows something similar. The 50-41 topline was LVs, but pushed leaners. Include only the "definite voters" and that pushes up to a 13-pt lead for Murray (43-30). I don't have one good explanation for this phenomenon, but I'd guess it's a combination of a) Dems being more diehard liberal in Washington and less swingy and/or sporadic than in other states, b) the economy being somewhat better in Washington than many other places, and c) teabagger ennui after Clint Didier lost the primary to establishment leftover Dino Rossi.

NM-Gov: We've got dueling banjos internals in the Land of Enchantment. Susana Martinez whipped it out first, rolling out a POS poll from last week with a 50-40 lead for her. Not to be outdone, Diane Denish pulled out her own poll from GQR from the same timeframe, showing that Martinez is leading "only" 49-44. Um... take that?

NY-Gov: Rick Lazio is hedging on what exactly he's going to do with his spot on the Conservative Party line, sounding like he wants to wait and see how Carl Paladino fares before making up his mind. Meanwhile, Andrew Cuomo got a pretty significant endorsement, from NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg, which may sway a few moderate indies but is probably mostly helpful from a GOTV organizational standpoint within the city. Meanwhile, you might have also heard something about a poll of this race today? I've heard a few rumblings. Anyway, we're deferring discussion of today's Quinnipiac poll until the Siena and SurveyUSA polls, due tomorrow, also come out, offering us a better yardstick.

RI-Gov, RI-01: Quest for WJAR-TV (9/15-17, likely voters, no trendlines):

Frank Caprio (D): 36
John Robitaille (R): 13
Lincoln Chafee (I): 24
Ken Block (M): 2
Undecided: 25

David Cicilline (D): 49
John Loughlin (R): 26
Undecided: 25
(MoE: ±4.7%)

This is probably the biggest lead we've seen for Frank Caprio in the Governor's race, and also the first post-primary poll of the race in the 1st, which looks to be an easy race for Providence mayor David Cicilline despite being an open seat in a dangerous year. The poll also finds the Dems easily winning the LG, AG, SoS, and RI-02 races.

TN-Gov: Crawford Johnson and Northcott for WSMV-TV (registered voters, trendlines from early July):

Mike McWherter (D): 24 (34)
Bill Haslam (R): 55 (60)
Undecided: 19 (6)
(MoE: ±4%)

I'm not going out on a limb by saying we can expect Bill Haslam to win the Tennessee governor's race. The only odd thing here is that this is WSMV's second poll of the race, and the number of undecideds has shot up dramatically since July (of course, it's a mystery how there were so few back then).

FL-22: Anzalone-Liszt for Ron Klein (9/14-16, likely voters, no trendlines):

Ron Klein (D): 48
Allen West (R): 40
(MoE: ±4.4%)

While this isn't an awe-inspiring lead for Klein in his own internal, it's a good topline and there are some interesting numbers in the fine print. Most notably, West's unfavorables have tripled (to 26%) since May as people have started paying attention.

MA-04: OMG, even Barney Frank's in trouble! (In case you couldn't tell, I was being sarcastic.) (Or was I?) Anyway, the Republican candidate running against Frank, Sean Bielat, is out with a poll from GOP pollster On Message giving Frank a 48-38 lead over Bielat. I suppose a ceiling of 38% is plausible for a no-name GOPer in this part of Massachusetts, which went 63% for Obama but includes a lot of exurbs and went narrowly for Scott Brown in the special election, but I'm unclear on how he gets much further than that.

PA-03: Franklin & Marshall (9/14-19, registered voters, no trendlines):

Kathy Dahlkemper (D-inc): 38
Mike Kelly (R): 44
(MoE: ±4.8%)

This seems to be the first truly independent poll of this race, although we've seen various internals and Republican third-party polls all showing Dahlkemper in trouble, though not always losing. Franklin & Marshall opts for the "losing" side, although it's slightly less severe among RVs (42-38).

VA-05: Benenson Strategy Group for Tom Perriello (9/14-16, likely voters, no trendlines):

Tom Perriello (D): 44
Rob Hurt (R): 46
Jeff Clark (I): 4
Undecided: 5
(MoE: ±4.9%)

Not much difference here than that DCCC poll by Global Strategy Group a few weeks ago that also saw Perriello down by 2. Again, not the most appetizing numbers for rolling out when it's your own internal, but at least it's some pushback against those SurveyUSA numbers.

WA-09: Benenson Strategy Group for Adam Smith (9/18-20, likely voters, no trendlines):

Adam Smith (D): 54
Dick Muri (R): 35
Undecided: 19
(MoE: ±4.9%)

Hmmm, speaking of pushback against SurveyUSA numbers, here's an internal from the Adam Smith camp (who were seen as being in a close race in a public poll from over the weekend). Now these are the kind of internal poll numbers we like to see... although the very fact that Adam Smith should have to be releasing internal polls in the first place is, well, a sign of the times.

DCCC: Here's some interesting money shuffling from the DCCC, which might portend an increased focus on GOTV. A CQ piece detailing some miscellany from their report this month included a number of transfers from the DCCC to state Democratic party committees. That includes $196K to Ohio, $142K to Arizona, and $132K to Arizona.

American Crossroads: Wasn't the "Crossroads" myth about selling your soul to the devil? At any rate, Politico is out with a nauseating story that's a stark counterpoint to the normal old committee numbers that we released this morning: while the Dems have advantages at the committee level, they're getting crushed in outside TV spending by third-party groups, to the tune of $23.6 million for GOP ads to $4.8 million for Dem ads. (Of course, some of that is money that in previous cycles would have gone to the RNC, which is way out of whack (or "wack," as Michael Steele might say) and unable to do much with its usual task of helping state committees... making the GOP more reliant than ever on hoping that their air saturation can overcome disadvantages in the ground game.)

The largest of these groups, of course, is American Crossroads, which is out with six new attack ads in different Senate races: Illinois ($482K), Kentucky ($235K), Nevada ($320K), New Hampshire ($643K), Ohio ($260K), and Pennsylvania ($226K). I know the teabaggers like to think that when the 2010 election is written in the history books, the story will be about some sort of populist uprising, but more likely, their useful idiocy will be long forgotten and the story will be about the uprising of a dozen or so billionaires, leveraging tens of millions on ads in order to save themselves hundreds of billions in taxes.

SSP TV:
CT-Sen: The state Democratic party goes after Linda McMahon, looking at job cuts she oversaw at WWE
MO-Sen: The DSCC wades back into Missouri, looking at how Roy Blunt keeps his corruption all in the family
MD-Gov: A DGA-allied group hits Bob Ehrlich for being in the pocket of utilities during and after his gubernatorial term
IL-10: Dan Seals goes negative against Bob Dold!, hitting him on social security and abortion rights
IL-14: Nancy Pelosi's coming for you! Booogetyboogetyboogety! (or so says Randy Hultgren's second ad)
NC-02: Renee Elmers found the money to run an ad? Well, it is cable only... Anyway, it's about the Burlington Coat Factory mosque, despite that Bob Etheridge says he doesn't support it
PA-11: Paul Kanjorski again goes negative on Lou Barletta on the bread and butter stuff, hitting for him opposition to a State Department security forces training center for the district
PA-17: Even Tim Holden's hitting the airwaves with two different ads, one that's a soft bio spot for himself, and then an attack on his opponent's role in legislative pay raises
WA-08: Suzan DelBene's second ad is against negative against Dave Reichert, especially for opposing financial reform

Rasmussen:
AK-Gov: Ethan Berkowitz (D) 34%, Sean Parnell (R-inc) 54%
CA-Gov: Jerry Brown (D) 47%, Meg Whitman (R) 46%
IL-Sen: Alexi Giannoulias (D) 41%, Mark Kirk (R) 44%, LeAlan Jones (G) 4%
ME-Gov: Libby Mitchell (D) 27%, Paul LePage (R) 45%, Eliot Cutler (I) 14%
MI-Gov: Virg Bernero (D) 38%, Rick Snyder (R) 51%
NY-Sen: Charles Schumer (D-inc) 58%, Jay Townsend (R) 36%

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 9/22 (Afternoon Edition)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Murkowski will keep her Energy & Natural Resources gig...
I wonder what on behind the scenes to keep that - it will be a boon for her to continue fund-raise from big oil, and shows Alaskans exactly what they'd be losing - ranking member on a very important committee to Alaskans.

It also shows that the GOP still has some good will towards Murkowski and that she'll caucus with them should she win.  

I wonder how Miller will react to this.  


What does it also say about Burr, the next in line?
Elaine Marshall, are you paying attention?

[ Parent ]
I'm surprised PA-03 is still in play
I figured that would be one of the first to fall. In FL-22 I really doubt Allen West has a chance, a lot of the argument for him is he held Klein to a 55-45 win in 08 but the district is very strictly partisanly divided so thats not a real surprise (it voted 52-48 for Gore Kerry and Obama). If Klein had been in his 10th term or something then the Clay Shaw lopsided margins in the district would be true for him but a 55-45 win is not unimpressive in such an unchanging and oddly shaped district district. The only way Allen wins is if the top of the republican ticket wins the district and the republicans that voted for Klein in 08 decide to vote for the guy they voted against two years ago. Since the senate race is split 3 ways and Sink is  probably going to win the district I don't think he'll pull it out.  

CO-02 (college)/FL-15 (home).  

I think Sink will really help
Klein here, and if Crist were to offer an endorsement it would help as well. Miami-Dade and Lauderdale were some of McCollum's strongest areas in the state.  

[ Parent ]
So thank goodness the Dems have a strong Gov candidate.
She can really help out people like Kosmas, Garcia, Klein, and possibly Grayson too.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
right i'm feel much more optomistic about Florida House races
then I was a month ago. I thought Kosmas was gone but Sandy Adams crazy positions combined with Kosmas hitting the right campaign notes is keeping it a tossup. Grayson is a very effective campaigner despite what his national profile looks like. I think a lot of people expect him to get trounced but it will be a fight even if he loses it will be close. The ad Grayson ran in 08 about contract fraud in Iraq was the most effective ad I saw for a florida pol that year.

CO-02 (college)/FL-15 (home).  

[ Parent ]
Did Hoffman ever decide if he was going to run in NY-23?
To potentially split the GOP vote with Doheny?

And people were arguing with me
the other day when I said Lincoln would have been in much better condition had the unions not spent 10 million dollars going nuclear against her? Or the imbecile that said Gilbert Baker would have beaten her?

This race will probably be 54-46. Even Obama can't destroy the state's Democratic infrastructure and Democratic leanings that quickly. I think AR Dems hold out decently; they'll hold on to every other statewide office and two of the state's 4 House Seats in my opinion. Plus retain large strength in the legislature. People have been predicting the collapse of the WV-DP for a decade now, since the heavy shift to Bush in 2000, (similarly to Arkansas's shift in 2008, only even more dramatic), and it hasn't occurred at any level thus far; in fact since then you could say the WV-GOP has gotten weaker in depth at all levels.

Lincoln overreacted to begin with, and that hurt her, trying to play every side of the issue on HCR. Then John Boozman, a non-crazy Republican got in and made it tougher for her, and he got in partially due to good early polling and partially due to the establishment's anticipation that Halter was preparing a run, even back in late January. Thus Lincoln had to spend four months and a few million dollars not on attacking Boozman, but on defending herself from countless negative assaults and on Halter in the primary, thus putting her in a deeper hole time wise and position wise than she would have been.

In the end, the truth remains that Boozman is a completely limp, uninspiring candidate, particularly on the stump, with no connection to the non AR-03 portion of the state and very little money. To top it off there pretty much is no AR-GOP; the Democratic party here has an institutional and organizational advantage here similar to the one Republicans have, in say, Idaho or Kansas, and perhaps even greater, and that is worth some 5-10 points in polling position.

This race might tighten further. I would never have written it off until the primary went so harshly. But even now Lincoln has a lot more money than Boozman and plenty of time to keep localizing the race as she has been doing. I've felt Mason-Dixon has been way too favorable to Boozman, and they have a shaky record here anyway, and of the main, non-Rasmussen polls, (or, as I like to say with AR, ridiculous polls, dating back to the tightness they showed in Beebe's race in 2006), they are the only ones with any real record to go off.

I've been trying to tell people the same thing about Chad Causey; his opponent has very little money, and, of all the Arkansas districts, Republican organization is actually WEAKEST in AR-01, which has not sent a Republican to congress since reconstruction. Jay Dickey held AR-04 until he decided it was a good idea to vote for Clinton's impeachment and Mike Ross showed him the flaw in such reasoning back in 2000. But no Republican has even performed well in AR-01 in recent history. So add 10 points to Democratic position in the polls and that gives you an idea of what the race will look like on election day.  


Lincoln has to run on her Ag Chairmanship...
Who gets that if she's not re-elected and what will that mean for Arkansan farmers?

If Dems lose 4-5 Senate seats, it means they'll need to pick up 5-6 GOP votes on virtually every bill.  There is no real difference electing Lincoln or Boozman, because it's not Boozman vs Lincoln but rather Boozman vs the 59th vote provided by the GOP on bills. Because with Lincoln elected that 59th vote becomes the 60th and would any bill change all that much when having to supply five GOP votes vs six?

OTOH, the Ag chairmanship is a valuable chip to have.  


[ Parent ]
That's an interesting angle
I do think that if AR Democrats start thinking about that it would definitely be a huge boon to Lincoln. If the perception of voters is that the GOP will take the House, (inaccurate), and make big gains in the Senate, (also fairly inaccurate I would say), then they would start considering whether they really need to vote Republican and that fits into Lincoln's narrative that she has done a lot for the state, and she can do more to help it.  

[ Parent ]
Two things
First, there aren't going to be many moderate Republicans in the Senate come January. Snowe, Collins, Brown, and maybe Kirk are going to be the only obviously obvious targets for Democrats, as it looks like Voinovich, Bond, Gregg, Martinez/LeMieux, Murkowski, Bennett and Specter are all going to be replaced by more conservative Senators and Crist, Campbell, and Castle are not going to be part of the caucus, which looked like it may have been the case this spring.

If Republicans get to 45 or 46, it's going to be very hard for Democrats to get a bill through without compromising with one or more of the chambers' conservatives, and if the number is 47 or higher everything is going to have to be a compromise to some degree. That's where the Boozman/Lincoln swap will hurt--the last few votes are going to be even harder to come by.

Second, if the GOP takes back the Senate by one vote in 2012, an awful lot of Democrats are going to wish Lincoln survived.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08


[ Parent ]
Not happening
Obama will bring out the Democrats not engaged right now in 2012. Democrats will be fine in the Senate.

Also, Gregg, Bond, Bennett and Murkowski cannot, without disgracing the word itself, be described as moderate. Neither really can Collins, Snowe and Brown. See how Brown voted against the heavily compromised final Financial deregulation bill even after being given special provisions that added Massachusetts.  


[ Parent ]
Sorry about the use of "moderate"
Perhaps a better term would be "the less conservative bloc of the Senate Republican Conference." Moderate or not, these folks are the most likely to vote with the Democrats on legislation (of course, they don't always do, and I'm sure there are plenty of examples for this.)

Looking a 2012, the Democrats have potentially vulnerable incumbents in MT, NE, ND, MI, MO, OH, FL, NJ, and VA. There could also be major headaches if Kohl or Rockefeller retire, minor headaches if Feinstein or Akaka retire, and God knows what will happen in Connecticut, where a Republican like Jodi Rell could conceivably win a plurality in a 3 way race with Lieberman and a Dem.

Republicans have to worry about MA, NV, and TX, possibly AZ, and there could be problems with an open seat in ME or IN.

So if Republicans get into the high 40's this year, they could definitely retake the Senate even if Obama wins comfortably in 2012--sort of like how Democrats made gains while losing the White House in 2000. And if Obama loses re-election, the Senate could get ugly in a hurry.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08


[ Parent ]
More comments
One, Kent Conrad will be fine. There's no one left popular to defeat him. Two, Jodi Rell would be 66 if she ran for a 6 year senate term in 2012.

More thoughts. Rockefeller isn't up for reelection in 2012, and Kohl is almost certainly retiring. Ron Kind has been the anointed successor since 1998, when he won his swingish, but Democratic leaning rural district. It'd be a quite a match up between him and Paul Ryan, and with Obama atop the ticket my money would definitely be on Kind without it being too big of a headache.

Feinstein is someone I also expect to retire. Debra Bowen, or Loretta Sanchez would be the favorites to replace her.

I don't really see Florida or NJ being threatened. And MT mainly depends on whether Denny Rehberg runs. Tester and McCaskill will have the toughest times. But I can't see McCaskill losing to Jim Talent in a more neutral cycle with Obama bringing out significant numbers of young and minority voters to the polls. Talent is still, in my opinion, too conservative to beat a relatively moderate Democrat in MO. Webb should be generally okay looking at the trend of Virginia, Deeds fiasco aside.

NE also depends on who Republicans get to run. And I also don't see Stabenow having too much trouble.  


[ Parent ]
A lot will depend on political climate
Considering that most of the potentially vulnerable seats are in swing states or Dem-leaning states, we should hold our numbers fine so long as Obama wins a comfortable reelection. If he only barely scrapes by or if he loses, though, then we could lose quite a few seats.  

[ Parent ]
Dems could definitely lose seats
If the economic situation stays the same/slightly improves and the Republicans nominate pretty much anyone but Palin, Obama is going to have a hard time winning reelection.  For the Senate, that would be a complete and unmitigated disaster.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

[ Parent ]
I've been hearing this "Obama's gunna have a hard time getting re-elected"
Meme in conservative circles staring one month after he was inaugurated.  I think you guess are just projecting your hopes into what will happen in 2012.

May I remind you how horrible Reagan was doing in '82?  Everyone pretty much thought he was dead meat, but, SUPRISE, it's harder to kick an incumbent president out that everyone though, and things picked up for him after the Reagan recession in '82.

I find that Obama will be similar to Reagan in many ways (not policy wise), in the fact they had landslide victories, were presented with similar situations, their parties look to lose quite a bit of seats and so on.  I have a feeling Obama will become Reagan esque when his second term ends, maybe even more so than Reagan.  I often ask people what earth shattering legislation he passed, and no one ever has a good answer, whereas Obama has his healthcare bill, which, like it or not, was pretty significant.

Obama will do better in 2012 than he did in 2008. Incumbent presidents usually do.

Sorry about any typos, I typed this on my phone, and had to set some things straight.

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)


[ Parent ]
Reagan turned it around, but will Obama?
It really turns on whether things improve.  If job growth remains sluggish and the Republicans nominate a good candidate, Obama is toast.  If job growth picks up (over 200,000 a month) and/or the Republicans nominate Palin, Obama wins.  Reagan got lucky.  Obama is not guaranteed the same luck.

I am not convinced he wins reelection or that he loses.  It really turns on whether the economy is improving 2 years from now at a pace that is noticeable.  If we continue to have this kind of recovery, Obama is gone.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


[ Parent ]
This downturn has been going on for 2 years
It looks like it is starting to uptick, I wouldn't be surprised if it is back to normal levels by mid 2011.

I'm just going to say it now, Barack Obama is going to be to Democrats what Ronald Reagan is to Republicans.  Just watch.

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)


[ Parent ]
My Thoughts
I disagree with you about Bill Nelson in Flordia being safe. In 2006 he was handed a gift by the name of Katherine Harris. His saving grace may be a legit tea bagger gets the nod. George Lemieux and Connie Mack would be very tough opponents for him to beat.

As far as Jim Webb I agree that he is likely safe but the Virginia GOP is deep. My dream would be for Eric Cantor to take the plunge and for Webb to absolutely destroy him, it would be tough but Cantor won't leave the House so one can only dream. I think that a rematch of 2006 vs. George Allen is going to happen. He is already talking about it. I do think that Allen is damaged goods so fine by me. As a Virginia voting against him twice would be great. Webb's toughest opponent by far would be former Rep Tom Davis but there is no way that he would win a primary as he is way too moderate for the primary voters of Virginia.  

I do see Talent giving McCaskill a really tough matchup if he runs which I think he will. She only won by just 3% in a very good year. Obama also narrowly lost Missouri but she has made a great name for herself.  

28, Male, Democrat VA-08  


[ Parent ]
Obama in MO
I can't see that being a big boost, considering he lost it in 2008.  

[ Parent ]
By 5000 votes
but he still drove other Democratic groups' turnout way up, which will benefit a Democrat winning over more conservatives and independents than he is, like McCaskill.  

[ Parent ]
Jo Ann Emerson could give McCaskill huge problems
She has a very moderate profile, could tighten the gender gap, and represents a part of the state that McCaskill over-performed largely in--probably the reason she won the election. Emerson might have trouble getting through a primary but would be a great recruit for the NRSC.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

[ Parent ]
A pro-choice Republican
win a Republican primary in Missouri? No way.  

[ Parent ]
Um no she couldn't
Emerson has never, EVER run a tough race the entire time she's been in Congress, having inherited her seat from her husband with a massive sympathy vote, and then almost immediately getting it gerrymandered for her so that she regularly wins 70%.

She's in her first competitive race this year and her campaign skills are turning out to be horrible. Besides mediocre fundraising, she's politically tone-deaf and keeps attacking Sowers in really awkward/awful ways.... like, when Sowers said he opposed DADT because it was an insult to the professionalism of soldiers, who could certainly handle being around gay people because that's just part of their job (which, btw, great response).

Just guess what Emerson's response was...what would you say to an Army Major like Sowers who spent more than a decade in the military? She said he didn't know what he was talking about because he'd never "commanded" anyone. D'oh. Cue a slew of the soldiers Sowers commanded being quoted about how great he was as a leader, and every newspaper in the district (and beyond) taking her to task for being wrong, negative and ignoring the actual issue.

Also, Claire McCaskill is a fucking badass with balls of steel. Seriously. She's a former prosecutor who took down all manner of rapists, drug dealers and murderers. She challenged a decidedly-meh governor in a primary--and won. She would rip the not-particularly-bright Emerson to pieces. And then Tommy Sowers would take Emerson's seat.

Actually, now that I think about it, you're totally right MassGOP, Emerson should totally run against McCaskill. :)

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
I should add
On paper, yes, Emerson would be a great recruit. In reality, not so much.

And yes, she'd never win the primary unless there were like 9 socially conservative teabaggers splitting the vote. Plus, her presence would get the remaining moderate Republicans in Missouri excited, and then make them hate whomever won, and subsequently vote against that primary winner.  

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
Kent Conrad
I don't know whether he'll be fine, but he could retire, just as Byron Dorgan did. And what then?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
2000
Remember that Gore won the popular vote by over 500,000 votes, so it's misleading to say the "Democrats made gains while losing the White House." Should a Republican Presidential candidate win the popular vote by 500,000 in 2012, it would not be surprising for Republicans to make gains in Congress.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
I thought Hoeven was pretty moderate
Dems seem okay with Ayotte as well, since they're leaving Hodes to himself.

I still am mot ready to write off Crist yet, because somebody could potentially have Meek stand down.  


[ Parent ]
Hoeven was fairly moderate as governor
You can't get to an 85% approval rating in a state where Obama got 45% by governing from the hard right. That said, senators have much more pressure to toe the party line than governors, who can do more or less what they want. I think at best he'll be another Voinovich (but with a mustache), at worst another Johanns.  

41, Ind, CA-05

[ Parent ]
Exactly
A bunch of Republican Senators who had been willing to support bipartisan legislation before 2008 have been filibustering almost everything, including things they voted for and even co-sponsored in previous years.

I would be very careful, in any case, about extrapolating anyone's record as a Governor to projections of how they would act and vote in the Senate. It is simply a different kind of job. Governors have to govern; they are responsible for seeing to it that the people's business is more or less taken care of. Senators don't have to govern, especially if they're in the minority; they can just engage in political posturing and advocacy of industries that lobby them and contribute to their campaigns, and blame the Chief Executive and the Congressional Leadership for anything that goes wrong.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Do I need to whip out the numbers again?
You -
Lincoln overreacted to begin with, and that hurt her, trying to play every side of the issue on HCR.

Flip-flopping on HCR was not Lincoln's problem. As I showed you last weekend, Mark Pryor, who wasn't trying to be on every side of HCR, had the same drop off in his approval rating that Lincoln did. Between March of 2009 and January of 2010, Lincoln's approval dropped 40 points and Pryor's approval dropped 41 points! No reasonable pollster (Rasmussen is not one in Arkansas), has been back to the state since January. I am using the PPP numbers.

Lincoln, I think, has just lost touch with her constituents. It goes beyond the HCR problems. I don't know if Pryor has too, or it is just the cementing of bad feeling of Democrats. Pryor's approval among Democrats in January of this year was in the low 50's.

28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26


[ Parent ]
Again
Pryor had to vote the way he did to give Lincoln cover. He also took a lot of heat from Democrats. He lost a lot of Democratic support and didn't really gain it among conservatives who soured on congress anyway, and him as part of congress.

I think both Mason Dixon and Ispos are reasonable pollsters; though Mason Dixon has not been particularly accurate in the past in Arkansas and I think they are overstating Boozman's strength by a few points, consistently doing so I mean.  


[ Parent ]
Pryor
voted for HCR. I didn't know he was taking heat from Democrats like Lincoln was. I thought he was kind of like the Byron Dorgan of Arkansas. (and Kent Conrad was the Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas). My recollection is his vote seemed to be in the bag for the Democrats if they needed him.

Do Mason Dixon and Ispos poll both Lincoln and Pryor's approvals or favorabilities?  

28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26


[ Parent ]
Not that I know of
Pryor, like Lincoln, voted to end the filibuster. Later though they both opposed a public option and I believe they both voted against reconciliation.

Mark Pryor isn't really populist like Dorgan. Maybe you could describe him as a bit more progressive than Lincoln, but not much.  


[ Parent ]
I wasn't "arguing" with you
You were just making factually incorrect polls about Lincoln trailing by no more than 4-7% before Halter announced (she in fact trailed by 15%-25% 6 weeks before Halter entered the race or landed a single hit on her); and about Boozman entering the race because of Halter (he in fact entered the race in the immediate aftermath of Scott Brown's victory).

You should also refrain from using words like "imbecile", especially about someone voicing an uncontroversial opinion like "Gilbert Baker would have beaten Lincoln."

I'm not the one who made that claim the other day, someone else did. But look - Baker led by a few percentage points in some polls. You can think Lincoln would have stormed back, but it's hardly idiotic to argue the contrary. I for one highly doubt she would have, and believe Baker would have beaten her by a not-so-close margin. Harry Reid is having trouble beating Sharron Angle, so not sure how it's idiotic to say Lincoln would have lost to Baker, who isn't even as controversial.

Apart from that, I agree with you that Arkansas Democrats will survive to fight another year - Mike Beebe is one of the safest statewide Democratic incumbents anywhere in the country and AR-1 isn't lost yet.


[ Parent ]
In answer to your question...
Yup, someone's already all over it:

http://www.LisaMurkwski.com

"IF SHE CAN'T PROOF-READ HER OWN CAMPAIGN ADS, HOW CAN WE BE SURE SHE REALLY TAKES THE TIME TO READ BILLS AND LEGISLATION THAT IMPACT OUR LIVES?"

(etc, etc)


Where is Boeing based?
Don't they a big center in Tacoma? My impression was that this could help her eke by a win in swingish Pierce county, which essentially ends all possible avenues for Rossi to win. All she really has to do to win statewide is narrowly win Snohomish and piece, get big margins in Jefferson and Thurston, and dominate King county. Democrats don't have to do much to win statewide in Washington. Its been 16 years since any Republican won a top of the ticket race, if you are of the view that Rossi legitimately lost in 2004, as I am.  

The main plants
are in Everett (in Snohomish Co., WA-02) and Renton (south King Co., WA-09), but I think there's a large parts plant in the Tacoma area.

[ Parent ]
So this definitely helps her
in Snohomish county. Good. That is a pretty close bellweather, almost exactly matching the results of the 2008 Presidential Election, and the 2008 and 2004 Gubernatorial elections, and the 2000, 2004, and 2006 Senate races.  

[ Parent ]
Boeing has a Pierce County plant in Frederickson
Employing just over 1100 workers, the Frederickson plant works with composite materials to fabricate 777 and 787 parts. Boeing just announced it will bring back in-house additional 787 fabrication work and has been hiring at the Frederickson plant in east Pierce County.

[ Parent ]
Current Boeing Employment in WA state
72,000

[ Parent ]
Boeing is "based" in Chicago
But it still has tens of thousands of employees in Washington state.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?...


[ Parent ]
WI-Sen: Feingold out with positive ad.

I think it's pretty good and it warming.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


There was a very good
write up in CQPolitics about how Feingold is handling it. I like his organization, and he has more money than I though. Johnson's been up constantly on the air, this race will tighten when Feingold returns the favor. He needs to really be slamming Johnson as a guy who married into wealth, used government contracts and money to his advantage, and now spending millions out of pocket trying to convince voters they don't deserve the same treatment and that they should elect him instead.  

[ Parent ]
Is that a green screen?
Maybe it's just a weird camera angle, but it looks like Feingold may not actually be in front of his house. If it is a green screen, and it can be proven that Feingold wasn't actually in Middleton for this ad, that could be devastating.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

[ Parent ]
Devastating? I doubt it.
Now if he still didn't live there in the same house that would be a disaster of an issue, but because he didn't film the ad in front of his own house but in front of a green screen- I don't see how that would be an issue at all.  

[ Parent ]
The whole point is that he hasn't changed much, he's still a simple Middletown guy
If it gets out that the ad was filmed in Washington, not Middletown,  what does that say about Feingold? Johnson would have a field day with that--the Senator trying to convince people he hasn't changed, when in fact, he's faking an ad that makes it look like he's the same guy in the same position he was in 1992.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

[ Parent ]
But he still lives there.
I think he'd welcome it becoming an issue because it would draw more focus to what is a good ad and the fact he still lives in the same house.  

[ Parent ]
not sure how that'd be proven though.
It's not like the campaign has to exactly say when the ad was filmed... If it was proven, it might generate a few generic articles, but I doubt it'd be anything more anyway.

[ Parent ]
Great ad
Feingold has a really good positive ad here, other Democrats could learn from him on what to find acceptable from their vendors in terms of concepts/themes and production quality.  

Democrat: TN-8

[ Parent ]
NC-02
Elmer's ad sucks beyond words.  This is nothing more than words of hatred and bigotry from her campaign.

This is nothing new with Etheridge.  Back in 1996, the incumbent Republican David Funderburke was spouting out rumors that Etheridge was gay (something about Etheridge's support for gay rights within the NC school system).  Funderburke's campaign even aired words that said something to the effect "Etheridge wants to go to congress to support his homosexual agenda".  It failed in 1996, and this will fail again in 2010.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


It's not just the hate part, it's also the irrelevance.
Whatever happened to "It's the economy, stupid?"

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Elmer can't win on the economy
This district tends to be more of a socially conservative as opposed to a fiscally conservative district.  As such, Elmer is trying to play on the fears of the less educated.  It won't work.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04

[ Parent ]
NC-02: That Ellmers ad is so full of fail.
It's not just that I disagree with the message, but this is the shittiest way to do a first ad.  It should either be a positive bio spot or an ad on the economy, not something immaterial to an election like that Islamic Community Center.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


Fail
Yea, the ad is totally over the top, but she doesn't have the money to put out a nice bio ad then follow it up with something else.  This is her long bomb - trying to gain attention and $ because without either, she's toast.  I don't think that it will work - even in NC which elected Jessie Helms a bunch of times, but she's got nothing to lose.

And she's getting a ton of free media out of it - so by that measure she succeeded.

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22


[ Parent ]
She comes off as a female Bill Sali.
Nope, I don't see how coverage of this will help her.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
My thoughts
I was so pissed when I saw that was what her first ad was. She needs to hammer Etheridge on the economy and his voting record. Etheridge's voting record would be a killer in that district if she let people know about it. When you have limited money, you need to stay on message.  

[ Parent ]
Umm
Obama won that district 52-45, and it's one of the Durham areas quickly trending more Democratic. I don't see what basis you have for Etheridge's voting record being "killer" in it.  

[ Parent ]
52-45
Not a huge win when districts he won with over 60% are in play. This is a Dem district locally, but Conservative. HCR, Stimulus probably don't go over very well there.  

[ Parent ]
I would say open-minded
and moderate, fairly high educated.  

[ Parent ]
I disagree
Etheridge's voting record fits this district particularly well.  

40, male, Democrat, NC-04

[ Parent ]
NV-Sen: Angle thinks mandated treatment for autism is something we don't need.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/blo...
"Take off the mandates for coverage in the state of Nevada and all over the United States," she shouts. "But here you know what I'm talking about. You're paying for things you don't even need.

"They just passed the latest one, is everything that they want to throw at us now is covered under 'autism'," she said, using exaggerated air quotes to deliver the word 'autism.'


If she were railing against the insurance mandate provision, this wouldn't be a big deal, but her belittling autism is to an extent.  Why?  Because I have autism spectrum disorder and I had a really hard childhood of isolation and despair.  Luckily, my family could afford psychological help that really helped me understand my condition and how to function better.  I was lucky.  I've known people with the same condition who have tried to commit suicide.

Treatment for autism is not something unnecessary.  It saves lives and provides hope and healing.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


She probably does not believe in autism...
I would not be shocked if Nevada's Village Idiot does not believe in Autism or believes it is some New World Order plot to control a portion of the population as mindless drones.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

[ Parent ]
guh
And another Harry Reid ad writes itself.

41, Ind, CA-05

[ Parent ]
My God
Harry Reid is the luckiest bastard in the world.

21,Democrat, NY-02, male

[ Parent ]
Chris Coons has actually been luckier
he got a candidate that he almost surely wins instead of almost surely losses to.

[ Parent ]
Doesn't she have ties to Scientology?
They view psychologists as evil, so I can't say I am surprised by her view.  

[ Parent ]
I don't think she's belittling the condition itself at all
Again, I'm no big Sharron Angle fan, but I think you're misreading her comments here. The fact is that autism is so poorly understood even by medical professionals that it's one of the most common misdiagnoses. The fact that she opposes a mandatory coverage provision isn't really that unreasonable when you consider how often other disorders are simply lumped under the "autism" umbrella, falsely or otherwise.

If the mandate had also increased the incentive to diagnose autism so that the patient would be covered, it could also skew statistics, make it seem that the disorder is becoming more prevalent, give Jenny McCarthy more power to falsely bash vaccines, and kill people misguided enough to listen to her. Not to mention that it'd cost everyone (including the vast majority of people who would never use such coverage) more money.

I'm sorry, I know this is a policy post and fairly off-topic, but I needed to rant. I've got family members who work with kids who really ARE autistic and it's a touchy subject.  


[ Parent ]
It shouldn't have to be up to interpretation at all.
And I doubt she'd have the brains to really mean it the way you said it.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
As somebody else with an autism spectrum disorder
Fuck you, Sharron Angle.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
As a third person with Aspergers snydrome,
Amen to that, and Harry Reid just earned $20 from me.  

16, Male, MD-8.

[ Parent ]
In that clip, she also bashes requiring
covering maternity in insurance policies for those that need it.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Another new Jerry Brown ad (Facebook link)
http://www.facebook.com/video/...

This one is really good IMO. No cheesy "Pinocchio" gimmicks but cold, hard facts. Love that he emphasized education.

16, Male, Democrat, CA-42/sometimes CA-32.


Yeah, that's a really good attack
My favorite attack ads are still the ones that the candidates narrate themselves, but this one is good because it hits Whitman directly on economic issues, which is what this and almost all other campaigns this year are all about.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

[ Parent ]
I
fully agree with your choice to wait to release the NY poll. That has outlier written all over it. If the other polls tomorrow confirm it then I will look like a fool but in the meantime I would put my money on a combo of outlier and primary bump but mainly outlier. I am not one to look at a poll I dislike and scream that its crap but I fully doubt that it is that close. Again if other polling confirms it then I will look foolish but that is a risk I am willing to take.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

Taegan tweets about two more polls tomorrow
... but it's unclear whether he's seen them, and he's a little ambiguous about whether they show the same trends. What he says is:

Don't believe today's NY-Gov poll showing Cuomo lead evaporating? Polls from Siena and SurveyUSA out tomorrow...


[ Parent ]
NY - Gov
Survey USA has it a 49-10 race.

http://www.democratandchronicl...

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22


[ Parent ]
Paladino is only getting 10% of the vote?
:P

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
49-40 <nm>


23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

[ Parent ]
Dang typo
49-40.  But even more interesting, burried in this article is this little nugget.

Other SurveyUSA results: Republican U.S. Senate candidate Joseph DioGuardi is running neck and neck with Democratic incumbent Kirsten Gillibrand for the seat vacated by Hillary Clinton;

wtf?  I really can't say I expected that.  They guy hasn't spent much money.  

http://voteup.democratandchron...

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22


[ Parent ]
NY wants to go Republican
New York wants to go Republican, but NY GOP is getting in the way.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

[ Parent ]
If Giuliani and Pataki
Or hell, even Giuliani and King, I think NY would be a big problem for Dems.  

[ Parent ]
Correction: You THINK New York "wants to go Republican"
Do you have actual evidence for that claim?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
SUSA SUCKSA
Knowing them, they probably have DioGuardi winning over a third of the black vote.

[ Parent ]
Quinnipiac
So what is wrong with the Quinnipiac poll from earlier today?

The only thing saving the NY Dems at this point is the gross incompetency of NY GOP.  

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


[ Parent ]
You might want to stop saying that over and over
If it's getting on my nerves, it's probably getting on quite a few other people's nerves as well.

[ Parent ]
Hello
"Hello. My Name Is Inigo Montoya. You Killed My Father. Prepare to Die."

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

[ Parent ]
Yeah
I like you Ryan, but you're getting to be like JSmith, except your thing is the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic and his was the South.  It's the repetition that's frustrating.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
I don't know who JSmith is...
but everything Ryan has said regarding the Midwest is true.

Look at the Midwest/Upper Rust Belt: You have the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, Michigan.

Now, let's look at the governors of those seats: R, D, D, D, R, D, D, D, D

Now, let's look at the unpopularity of the governors in these states: Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes, No, Yes, Yes, No (but there's a separate reason this is included), Yes.

Now, let's look at the flip of governors: Flip, Flip, Flip, Flip, Not Flip, Flip, Flip, Would Flip if Manchin Weren't on the Ballot, Flip.

Now, let's look at the flip of senators: Feingold could go down, Giannoulias could go down, Ellsworth is going down, Fisher is almost a sure loser, Sestak is probably going down if the election is today, and Manchin has to watch himself.

Now, let's look at the House races:
Wisconsin: WI-07, WI-08 (Republican polls show the Democrat down; I have no doubt they are in reality) WI-03 is a potential flipper if the wave gets big.

Iowa: IA-01, IA-02, and IA-03 are competitive.

Illinois: IL-11 is a sure goner. IL-14 is a tossup. IL-17 is a potential flipper.

Indiana: IN-08 is probably gone though I would like to see some polling out of there. IN-02 is close in a Republican internal, but I think Donnelly should be fine. IN-09 is going to be close but Hill should win.

Ohio: OH-01, and OH-15 are gone. OH-16 is probably gone, but some polling needs to confirm this. OH-13 shows Sutton leading between 3-5, and if Democrats pull out of both the Governor and Senate races, that could endanger OH-6 and OH-18.

Pennsylvania: PA-03, PA-07, and PA-11 are probably gone. PA-10 shows Carney in a tight race, PA-08 shows Murphy in a tight race, and PA-04 and PA-17 are within the realm of possibility. Don't count out PA-12. And what's with PA-13 being added to the NRCC roster? And no, we aren't picking up PA-06, and PA-15.

Michigan: MI-01, MI-07, MI-09.

That's 29 (!!!!!) seats in the House. Granted, some of them are not going to flip, but... compare that to the South.

All of the governors seats in the Midwest are going to flip with the exception of Indiana. (West Virginia will flip in 2012 with Moore Capito on the ballot)

And then Ryan proceeds to say that if Republicans had recruited real people in New York, things might have gone better. We know that. Look at the numbers from earlier this year regarding Rudy and Pataki.

 

28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26


[ Parent ]
Well
I don't think it's so much that people disagree with his conclusion, just that he keep repeating it over and over.

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

[ Parent ]
Ok, well I just summed it up in one giant post, so it doesn't need to be restated again. JK.
But the people here who think the South is going before the Midwest seem to be excluding the polls.

28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26

[ Parent ]
Feel lucky you werent here for Jsmith
Ob-fucking-noxious.  Oh wait, IHATEBUSH was even worse!  Just non-stop, extremist annoyance.  

We've just had a NY discussion heavy day and Ryan went through them all.


[ Parent ]
I completely agree.
Ryan is smart and his theory seems to be shaping up well, but he's beating it into the ground, and even gets a little hostile when anyone suggests someone might actually win or even come close in one of these states.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
What the hell could have happened in the last two weeks
to change the narrative from a 70-30 Cuomo lead to this? Is beastiality the new ticket to winning?  

CO-02 (college)/FL-15 (home).  

[ Parent ]
Crazy
Crazy is the new black.

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

[ Parent ]
A shift to Likely Voter screens...
...with dems sleeping at the switch.

[ Parent ]
No Q poll on the senate race yet


[ Parent ]
Tomorrow morning at 6:30...
Prepare for some heartburn...

[ Parent ]
Not surprising with that kind of LV sample...
Gillibrand was always weaker than Cuomo.

It's a good thing she has a lot of money.... how much money does this DioGuardi have?

Blomberg endorsing Cuomo will certainly help out the GOTV in New York City, where Gillibrand has very weak support.


[ Parent ]
DioGuardi
will have more money now.

[ Parent ]
DioGuardi has only about $850K COH
It's why so many high-profile Republicans backed the self-funding David Malpass instead. DioGuardi was able to run only one TV ad during the primary (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SezlrmiyKxs).

Gillibrand does have rather middling support in NYC, but I can't imagine Cuomo didn't have it locked-down pre-Bloomberg. Keep in mind, Cuomo will perform beautifully downstate - it's upstate where Paladino is aiming to run-up the numbers.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


[ Parent ]
49-40
Definitely not a fluke then.  It appears the "I am nuts, vote for me" thing might be gaining some ground.  Still likely Democratic until I see another poll.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

[ Parent ]
WTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTF
http://www.publicbroadcasting....

Also, WTF? You'd think maybe low income independents would oppose their own incarceration.  


[ Parent ]
Well
Hoosierdem the fool. : )
It's probably a primary bump but still worth keeping on the radar. Gosh darn it I never thought I would have to pay any attention to this one once Patterson dropped out. Although if Lazio stays conservative it will be interesting to see how things play out. Although if Pal... whats his name is really going to be competitive then I think Lazio will feel the pressure to drop out. Even with these polls its leans D, possibly likely if Lazio stays on.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
New David Vitter ad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
Great message in LA. But what's up with the long pause at the end? Reminds me of Ben Quayle!  

I think it's supposed to let it sink in that Melancon is trying to do whatever the ad is saying.
I would like to see David Vitter himself in the ad (Why is that woman narrating the ad?)

28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26

[ Parent ]
Because its an attack ad
Most of the times, candidates don't narrate attack ads. They don't want to be associated with them. IDK why. I think ads where the candidate narrates an attack are much more powerful. Your right though, here it is weird. Why is she on camera? Usually narrators in attack ads are not on the camera, unless they are named and of some importance.  

[ Parent ]
Impressive ad
I was actually rooting against Vitter, but my view of Melancon, which was quite positive, dropped like a stone after watching this ad.  

38, male, conservative Republican, TX-3 currently (IL-13)

[ Parent ]
Well
Any positive view you have of almost every Dem senate candidate will drop like a rock. Almost every candidate and incumbent in a tough race was there.  

[ Parent ]
Well
At least I now know how to pronounce 'Melancon' - I would have sounded really stupid in a conversation because I would have used English pronunciation!  

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

[ Parent ]
McMahon ad is valid and good
However if I own a company and then run for office one day are people going to attack me for laying someone off no matter what?  It is a legit issue, don't get me wrong.  

Please donate to amcharities.org to help build more after school centers in the Miami area.  

23, Democrat, IA-2


More Time/CNN polls
I see its PA poll was posted at the top of the page, but here are some more, if they haven't been posted yet:


CNN / Time / Opinion Research Corporation
9/17-20/10; 860 likely voters, 3.5% margin of error
Mode: Live telephone interviews
(CNN release)

2010 Senate
49% Buck (R), 44% Bennet (D) (chart)

2010 Governor
47% Hickenlooper (D), 29% Tancredo (i), 21% Maes (R) (chart)

Delaware

CNN / Time / Opinion Research Corporation
9/17-20/10; 703 likely voters, 3.5% margin of error
Mode: Live telephone interviews
(CNN release)

2010 Senate
55% Coons (D), 39% O'Donnell (R) (chart)
If Castle were the nominee: 55% Castle (R), 37% Coons (D)

Pennsylvania

CNN / Time / Opinion Research Corporation
9/17-20/10; 741 likely voters, 3.5% margin of error
Mode: Live telephone interviews
(CNN release)

2010 Senate
49% Toomey (R), 44% Sestak (D) (chart)

2010 Governor
52% Corbett (R), 44% Onorato (D) (chart)

Wisconsin

CNN / Time / Opinion Research Corporation
9/17-20/10; 963 likely voters, 3.5% margin of error
Mode: Live telephone interviews
(CNN release)

2010 Senate
51% Johnson (R), 45% Feingold (D) (chart)

2010 Governor
53% Walker (R), 42% Barrett (D) (chart)




Well, after initially being very depressed...
I cheered up significantly when I saw that every D in that list was leading amongst registered voters.  That means that we just need to get out that vote as best as we can.  As hard as that may be, it's certainly easier than changing peopel's minds about a candidate.

There is still hope... at least until tomorrow when SurveyUSA will probably have Cuomo losing or something ridiculous.


[ Parent ]
They have him ahead by 9


[ Parent ]
Everything has matched there over the last week
I think it's safe to assume both Boxer and Brown have 5-8 point leads now.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

[ Parent ]
I think it's safe to say CA is giving us a preview of America in 20 years......
It's frankly a shocker Brown is winning now.  His campaign has been shitty almost the entire time until VERY recently.  It was just a couple weeks ago that he had his disastrous Clinton gaffe that looked to me like it was the final nail in his coffin after he'd already fallen behind.  Whitman had spent over $100 million with no end in sight to her ad buys and frankly has run a good campaign.

And in an instant, just by getting Bill Clinton to validate him and getting some ads on the air, he's instantly on top.

Virtually anywhere else in America, a Democrat in Brown's condition would be down 20.

But he's winning.

This is the WEIRDEST fucking cycle I've ever lived through.  Gillibrand is in a tossup now and Manchin is barely winning, but Jerry Brown is going to get elected in another era as Governor of the largest state after running a bad campaign against a billionaire?

Message to voters:  please return to normal and just vote for all the normal candidates who run good campaigns on election day.  I don't want my head to explode.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
I'm glad
we REALLY need a Democrat in the Governor's seat. Not just for redistricting, but to really implement some much needed changes without the late budgets. Plus it will bring me joy to see eMeg flush down $120 million just to lose, even if every other candidate i want to win loses, as long as Brown beats Whitman, i'm a happy camper.


16, Male, Democrat, CA-42/sometimes CA-32.

[ Parent ]
It
could be but lets wait until tomorrow before we label NY Sen as a tossup. Even if the results are similar it is probably lean D. It might be a tossup but with do respect we haven't even seen the freaking polls yet. NY- Gov is now competitive but let's not forget Pal just won a competitive primary, this is probably a bit of a bump. Again it is now competitive I do not deny that. It's not to say that we don't have a race on our hands but still Cuomo still has the edge. Not to mention if Lazio goes third party then we are nearly guaranteed it.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Still crazy
Brown and Boxer getting only 2/3 of the AA vote.

[ Parent ]
Yep
No question the Dems are on the march in CA.

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

[ Parent ]
Probably
Because Boxer and Brown have gone up now. Fiorina's team is panicking, with TV ad buys beginning sometime this week or next week. They initially said they'd wait to go up on TV until October, saying they would feel good if they survived Boxer's initial ads. She has tanked and Boxer surged since Boxer's ads began, so now she is going up with ads. Probably see a big check sometime soon too

[ Parent ]
So
Fiorina was going to try the Joe Sestak route and blitz the airwaves a few weeks before election day? Not practical in California. Though maybe Fiorina will make sure her attack ads are as outrageous and hilarious as those webads she released earlier this year. We can only hope....

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
Fiorina
She's got another Fred Davis special all ready to go, it seems...

Davis is orchestrating a simple shot. Fiorina, alone, speaks to the camera against a dark, moodily lit backdrop, her hazel eyes twinkling as commanded. A tech turns on the fog machine. In the blue light, the effect is ethereal. Fiorina, the tough, smack-talking former Hewlett-Packard chief executive, is transformed into a delicate angel.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

Can't wait to see it!

43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22


[ Parent ]
I'm just not sure
that Carly could run a much better campaign than she has.  She has run a pretty good on-message campaign, and has mostly refuted all the negative attacks against her.  The one thing she hasn't done enough is to attack Boxer, but there just aren't many who are undecided about Boxer, you either love her or hate her.  

But there's just so much you can do in a heavily Dem state like California.  I think Fiorina will need a blunder by Boxer to win this race.

38, male, conservative Republican, TX-3 currently (IL-13)


[ Parent ]
Dude...
Are you high right now? FAILorina has run a good campaign? You're kidding right? Tell me you're kidding....  

Yeeeah, anyway, I'm just going to go with: I disagree that she's run a good campaign.

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
No I think she has
There isn't much Carly can do anymore about her time at HP or her position on abortion.  But given that those circumstances, Fiorina has run a decent campaign.  She clearly beat Boxer in the first debate, IMO.
Boxer, well she's my 100th favorite senator. Heck, I'd even prefer Christine O'Donnell over her.  It broke my heart when she survived in 1998.

38, male, conservative Republican, TX-3 currently (IL-13)

[ Parent ]
I'd vote for Boxer, but I agree that Fiorina's run a fine campaign
And, yes, I also think she won the debate.  

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
Quinnipiac NY Senate tomorrow...
Should be a doozy!!

I've never been so intrigued by an upcoming poll...
All along, I've felt DioGuardi performs about 5 points better than Paladino. If my hunch holds, we're looking at a barn burner tomorrow.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
Maybe
I will go out on a limb and say that they are about the same. My limb going has not been good today so maybe I should avoid the going out on limbs, IDK. Back on topic people tend to be more willing to vote for someone of the opposite party on the state level than on the federal level. I really want to see the Siena poll but I will not deny that things have gotten interesting. It's probably a primary bump but maybe it's the start of a trend. Dam, Cuomo was supposed to provide coattails.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
It's not "interesting" or "a burnburner" you guys, it FUCKING SUCKS......
We now have to worry about NEW YORK???!!!  And who's giving us heartburn are a C-list sacrificial lamb and a F-list crank???!!!  This isn't D'Amato and Pataki we're talking about, these candidates are the college football equivalent of Division III teams going up against BCS conference teams.

I almost just want the election to come and go so we can get it over with.  I don't want "interesting barnburners" where we don't expect it and can't afford it.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
We give ya'll Delaware
But take WI, NY, and WV. Deal?  

[ Parent ]
You
probably got WI but don't get too cocky just yet. I think WV Sen is your guys KY 2008. It looks good on paper, you've got a good shot but you just never quite get there. Lunsford led in a couple of polls as well. NY, well we'll see it will be closer than expected and you'll probably get some house seats with the meh coattails but I still think this is out of your reach. Hey I'll still take DE and Cali though. : )  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I agree
I do think WV still Leans-very slightly- Manchin. If Raese's ads stay so good and Manchin's so bad, then I think this will quickly become a toss-up. NY is just a DioGuardi primary bounce. I still think Gillibrand wins comfortably unless DioGuardi has millions stashed away somewhere.

[ Parent ]
WV and NY
are up again in 2012. So you may not want them.

[ Parent ]
WV
Would be an easy hold in 2012. with Obama at the top of the ticket, it'd be extremely hard to lose that seat for us. NY, I imagine dioGuardi might retire, considering he'd be 72 and Obama would be at the top of the ticket. The fact they are special elections is actually an incentive, since they would be seated immediately.  

[ Parent ]
Just when we get Delaware off the board, WV and NY get added to it. Ugh......
This is the most heartburn-filled cycle ever for me.  Worse than 1994.

I'm glad our candidates have the money they have.  Gillibrand is going to have to fight hard, and Schumer and Cuomo better be ready to spend as well.  Schumer is doing fine but needs to help his ticketmates.  They've got to get the Dem base motivated in this one.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
CBS Affiliate Pulls Anti-Boucher Ad by Americans for Job Security
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/ey...

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


Castle mulling going Murkwoski route?
http://www.politico.com/news/s...
I wonder if he could win? Would he take enough Dems that are afraid of letting O'Donnell win? Would he get enough Republicans? I know he'd win Independents.  

Doesn't sound like he's really "mulling" it at all...
He says himself that it's extremely unlikely...  

[ Parent ]
NY-Sen: Gillibrand up by ONE point
http://www.wgrz.com/news/local...

She's trailing everywhere but NYC.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


Survey USA fail.
Bring in Siena!  C'mon!

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
It's
somewhat believable as Q has similar Gov numbers but all the same I am with you in wanting to see Siena.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Oh, come on
People lambaste SUSA for the entire cycle, then when they show both Brown and Boxer up by the same margins other pollsters do, people agree with them. Now they're a fail again?

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

[ Parent ]
I'm skeptical no matter what now.
The CA results are good, but I take salt with them anyway.
Also, Siena is the gold standard and showed her with an approval of 62% in NY-20 and she has pretty good approval elsewhere upstate.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
No.
With SUSA's massive GOP lean, that means that in California, the Dems are up REALLY big instead of just by a bit.

[ Parent ]
Then is PPP wrong in CA?
Or CNN or Rasmussen, all of whom have showed the California races in the same ballpark as SUSA in their most recent polls?

I understand the hesitance to trust these guys, but if Siena and Quinnipiac also have NY-Sen-B close, I think it's time to stop automatically dismissing them. Like Rasmussen, they've gotten less outlier-ish on the statewide level recently.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08


[ Parent ]
Because this is the only poll showing NY-Sen B that close
And this race has actually been polled pretty damn extensively.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
All of them with registered voters...
That makes a big difference.  I suspect the Quinnipiac numbers to be similar.

[ Parent ]
Oh come on, that only goes so far
Cuomo was leading by 37 points in Quinnipiac's last poll. Are you seriously going to tell me that moving to a likely voter model is going to move the needle 31 points?

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
That's not entirely accurate...
He was up by 37 points 'cos there were tons of undecideds without a GOP candidate.  He dropped from 60 to 49 which is consistent with a 10 point enthusiasm gap and the current gap is consistent with New York being a D+10 state.

[ Parent ]
Now that's being dishonest
It's a 37-point difference, Cuomo dropped 11 points while Paladino picked up 20 (as in, was at 23 a month ago, now he's at 43).

Switching to a likely model just doesn't explain that kind of variance, not even the ten points Cuomo lost.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
Question
is does it hold? Me thinks not. Let's see what Siena has to say. I'm telling you primary bump. My guess its fairly competitive but I seriously doubt they actually win either race. Though this makes me extremely pessimistic about the house seats and AG races as this means no coattails and we needed those coattails.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Ugh. I feel a disturbance in the Force
This and Feingold really takes the cake.

[ Parent ]
Primary Bump.
Not saying it will not be competitive but its not gone like Wisconsin. I still say Gilly wins 7-10 points. I have little doubt that Cuomo will break double digits.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Somewhat of a relief this morning
although of course I would like a little better cushion. Waiting still on Siena results.

[ Parent ]
Murphy trailing by 14 in F & M poll
http://whyy.org/cms/news/gover...

No numbers.  They usually have a high undecided.


49-35 among likely voters
46-36 among registered voters.

http://www.philly.com/philly/n...


[ Parent ]
Even better news from an unlikely source
http://www.surveyusa.com/clien...

Survey USA says Brown by 3.  That's four pollsters this week (Field, SUSA, Rasmussen, PPP) confirming the Brown surge.  Way to go, Jerry!

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
Meh. I'd still vote for Whitman haha...
I have to wonder, though, how strong Brown's field operation will be come election day. 'Cuz I have to imagine Whitman will have that covered pretty extensively.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
My Scoreboard
House - Republicans gain 32.

Republican pickups (37): AR-01, AR-02, AZ-01, AZ-05, CO-03, CO-04, FL-02, FL-24, IL-11, IL-14, IN-08, KS-03, LA-03, MD-01, MI-01, MI-07, MS-01, ND-AL, NH-02, NY-19, NY-29, OH-01, OH-15, OH-16, PA-03, PA-07, PA-08, PA-11, TN-06, TN-08, TX-17, TX-23, VA-02, VA-05, WA-03, WI-07, WI-08

Democratic pickups (5): DE-AL, FL-25, HI-01, IL-10, LA-02

Senate - Republicans gain 6.

Republican pickups (6): AR, CO, IN, ND, PA, WI

Governors - Republicans gain 6.

Republican pickups (13): IA, IL, KS, ME, MI, NM, OH, OK, OR, PA, TN, WI, WY

Democratic pickups (7): CA, CT, FL, HI, MN, RI, VT

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


That's pretty close to my own predictions
I have NM-02 as GOP pickup and have us retaining AZ-01.  Besides that, we are the same in regards to the house.

I think we will retain WI-Sen, but it's going to be a close one.  I see PA and CO swinging either way (I actually feel slightly better about Sestak in PA than Bennet in CO).  

Governor's races...I have no qualms at all with your predictions.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
Disagree on CO and PA, I feel a LOT better about Bennet than Sestak......
What I've read from nonpartisan campaign reports is that Bennet clearly has run a better campaign than Buck, but the headwind has just been real strong.

The headwind is no less strong against us in PA, but Toomey is a better candidate than Buck and has run a clearly much better campaign.

And I think ultimately the CO-Gov race helps us a little bit.  I know some people here commented that not being able to send the Dems "a message" in the Gov race makes some swing voters want to do so in the Senate race, but I'm skeptical of that hypothesis because usually in a wave synergy takes over, and losing one top race only hurts the disfavored party in other races; so, easily winning CO-Gov interrupts that synergystic voting psychology.  CO voters already are disgusted with the state GOP for the gubernatorial debacle, and landing enough punches on Buck will help us persuade them that Team Red is simply not worthy of their votes even if they're disappointed in Team Blue.  It's still clearly an uphill climb for Bennet, but I feel a lot better about his chances of surging late than Sestak's chances of surging late.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
PA-02/PA-03
The PA-03 link is actually Florida's polling memo... electoral-vote is saying that Rep. Fattah is DOWN 4 in his race?  Huh?  It's the same F&M poll that has Rep. Dahlkemper down 4.  Looking for more information on that...


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox