Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 9/14 (Afternoon Edition)

by: Crisitunity

Tue Sep 14, 2010 at 3:51 PM EDT


DE-Sen: It'd D-Day for the Republican Party: the "D" could stand for "Delaware," or maybe for the "dipshits" in the Tea Party who we'll see tonight whether they've fully succeeded in taking over the asylum. At any rate, the state GOP is rolling out a robocall from a former Christine O'Donnell 2008 staffer who's now supporting Mike Castle; she says O'Donnell isn't a "true conservative" (although that's evidenced by her inability to get her own spending under control). O'Donnell's camp responds saying the disgruntled staffer was fired after a week, rather than leaving on her own. The Beltway CW of today, at least as far as Politico goes, seems to be that Castle has regained some momentum over the last few days what with the increased scrutiny of O'Donnell, pointing to changes in responses to phonebanking in recent days.

FL-Sen: Here's an interesting endorsement for Charlie Crist, that may help him with the growing Haitian community in the Miami area. Haitian-American State Rep. Yolly Roberson, who recently lost the FL-17 Democratic primary, gave his backing to Crist instead of Kendrick Meek, whose newly-vacated seat he was vying to occupy.

NV-Sen, NV-Gov: The first of three (count 'em) polls out in the Nevada Senate race has what just about everyone else has seen in this quickly-getting-overpolled race: Harry Reid leads Sharron Angle in the low single digits. Ipsos/Reuter's second poll of the race gives Reid a 46-44 lead. (It was 48-44 in favor of Reid in their first poll in early August.) Apparently this wasn't the respected pollster showing a single-digit gubernatorial race that Jon Ralston was rumbling about, though: their gubernatorial numbers are 60 for Brian Sandoval, and 31 for Rory Reid. (The trendlines were 50-39 for Sandoval, so that's quite a drop, especially when considering that the Senate race has barely budged.)

WA-Sen: Republicans hoping for some sort of reconciliation in Washington are out of luck. Clint Didier is still holding out on endorsement for Dino Rossi, popping up briefly yesterday to tell Politico that he won't do so unless Rossi capitulates to Didier's three demands regarding action items.

RI-Gov: Michael Bloomberg parachuted into yet another race with an endorsement, as part of his nebulous goals of advancing some sort of center-left post-partisan zeitgeist. He offered his backing to moderate GOPer-turned-liberal indie Lincoln Chafee, who seems to fit the Bloomberg worldview pretty well.

NY-St. Sen.: Veteran political reporter Liz Benjamin is out with her handicapping of the New York state Senate races this year (New York elects all Senators every two years, so everybody's up this year, as always). She points to seven Tossups, four of which are Dems and three of which are GOPers (thanks in large part to open seats). That means that control of the body, currently 32-29 (with 1 previously-GOP vacancy), is truly up for grabs this year. It's all presented in a nice-looking map format, although the functionality needs some help.

SSP TV:
CA-Sen: Barbara Boxer's campaign's first ad emphasizes veterans, small business, and green jobs
MO-Sen: The winning ad of the day may just be a little radio ad from Robin Carnahan, which actually uses a jingle (how many political ads do that anymore?); the song goes amusingly negative against Roy Blunt
KY-Sen: The newest Jack Conway ad works the law & order angle, saying Rand Paul is soft on crime, while the NRSC is out with an ad that seems to be poking fun at Conway's horse-owning ways as a means of linking him to Barack Obama... or something like that
CO-Gov: The Colorado trainwreck continues unabated, as Tom Tancredo's first ad is an anti-Dan Maes hit job, featuring a nice little old lady who says that Maes conned her out of her money without getting into any of the specifics
FL-Gov: Rick Scott's back on the air after letting his money have a few weeks off, trying yet again to tie Alex Sink to Barack Obama
MA-Gov: An anti-Charlie Baker spot from Bay State Future hits Baker on his stewardship of the Big Dig, a 90s public works debacle that turned into a collective scar on the Massachusetts psyche
CA-03: Ami Bera's first ad focuses on Dan Lungren's last minute pay raise that he gave himself as state AG, boosting his pension
CO-07: Ed Perlmutter's out with his first ad, a positive spot
IL-11: Debbie Halvorson's first ad uses testimonials from the unemployed to hit Adam Kinzinger hard for his support of free trade agreements
OH-15: Mary Jo Kilroy, similarly endangered, also opts for the negative ad route, hitting Steve Stivers for his work as banking industry lobbyist
OH-18: Sensing a theme? Zack Space hits Bob Gibbs on his support for free trade agreements too
PA-07: Bryan Lentz is out with two separate ads, one a basic intro spot, the other making an argument that all Dems should be making: that supporting extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy doesn't jibe with wanting to reduce the deficit
PA-08: Patrick Murphy talks to the camera to do some compare & contrast with Mike Fitzpatrick
SD-AL: Two dueling ads from Stephanie Herseth Sandlin and Kristi Noem: Noem's first ad is a generic attack on Washington, while Herseth tries to rebut an ad from AFF, saying, no, she's actually conservative

Rasmussen:
CO-Gov: John Hickenlooper (D) 46%, Dan Maes (R) 21%, Tom Tancredo (C) 25%
NV-Sen: Harry Reid (D-inc) 48%, Sharron Angle (R) 48%
OH-Sen: Lee Fisher (D) 41%, Rob Portman (R) 49%

A Rasmussen By Any Other Name Would Still Smell: When a gigantic slew of polls for Fox News came out, showing, as one might expect from Fox, bad results for Democrats, I wasn't surprised. Something seemed off, though: I first noticed that this wasn't Fox's usual pollster (which is Opinion Dynamics), but someone called Pulse. Then some of the details really made my antennae twitch: these were auto-dialed polls conducted over one day (meaning no callbacks), and the day they chose was not only a Saturday (when young people tend to out, y'know, doing things) but freakin' 9/11! Then Taegan Goddard helpfully pointed out this, which explains it all: Pulse Research is a subsidiary of Rasmussen. You may recall some discussion earlier in the year of a new Rasmussen venture that would let people pay $600 to poll anything or anyone they wanted... that's Pulse. So, they're just going in the Rasmussen containment pool with the "real" Rasmussen polls; for what it's worth, the numbers are pretty much in line with where Rasmussen sees the races, so at least we know Pulse isn't doing anything differently.
CA-Gov: Jerry Brown (D) 43%, Meg Whitman (R) 49%
CA-Sen: Barbara Boxer (D-inc) 46%, Carly Fiorina (R) 44%
FL-Gov: Alex Sink (D) 49%, Rick Scott (R) 41%
FL-Sen: Kendrick Meek (D) 21%, Marco Rubio (R) 41%, Charlie Crist (I) 27%
NV-Gov: Rory Reid (D) 38%, Brian Sandoval (R) 56%
NV-Sen: Harry Reid (D-inc) 44%, Sharron Angle (R) 45%
OH-Gov: Ted Strickland (D-inc) 43%, John Kasich (R) 48%
OH-Sen: Lee Fisher (D) 41%, Rob Portman (R) 48%
PA-Gov: Dan Onorato (D) 40%, Tom Corbett (R) 50%
PA-Sen: Joe Sestak (D) 41%, Pat Toomey (R) 47%

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 9/14 (Afternoon Edition)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Actually
I hate to say this, but a lot of these polls are better for Dems than other polls.  In many races where Reps have been leading by 10%, they're leading here by only 6%.

That's not true at all, on the contrary these are the same, not better......
These polls aren't really any worse than others, but they're not better, either.  By "others," I'm considering the totality of polling, with a couple exceptions.  The exceptions are NV-Sen where all non-Rasmussen polling has had Reid leading narrowly for a couple months, and FL-Sen where one or two other polls show Rubio pulling away into the 40s but there's not enough data to reliably call it a trend.

But yeah, at least the rest of these aren't really any worse than the norm.  Some are worse than the Rasmussen "brand" polls, but they're in line with the totality.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
NV-Sen
Is the only one that stood out but I guess it is in the MoE with his own poll showing a 48-48 tie. I think we can safely say Ipsos and Mason-Dixon are more trustworthy.

[ Parent ]
I now am going to pick SSPer atldem's brain on everything in Nevada because...
...he revealed in a comment this week that he has a lot of party connections and knows a lot of what is REALLY going on that doesn't necessarily show up in September polling.

So for "reliable" information on the state of the race, atldem is my new go-to guy, with polling and my own thoughts in the mix, too, of course.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
PA-08; metamessaging......
PA-08:  Murphy's approach is unique and bold:  putting his own face and voice to the negative attack on his opponent.  You never see that, CW says you have a narrator or other surrogate do it for you.  I'll be interested to see how the ad plays, it could go real well or real badly......or maybe no difference.

Metamessaging:  I think we know what polled well in party committee polling!  So many of our candidates are using the same attack themes.  And that's GOOD.  We have a semblance of message.  And what I like even more is that so many of our incumbents and other candidates aren't hesitating to go hard negative.  That's what our campaigns have to do to save seats.

If we pull off a major upset and hold our House losses below 40, we can thank campaign strategy for that outcome.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


Looking at individual districts polling right now
The upset would be if the Republicans won more than 40 districts, not the other way around.  

After all, they've fallen behind in districts like SD-1, NM-2, and IA-3 within the past week.  If they can't win districts like those, their path to the house majority becomes much more murky and difficult.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


[ Parent ]
Murphy
I absolutely love the Murphy ad. I just think it's so much stronger than the normal, evil sounding voice over. Sure, you don't want Murphy doing a hatchet job, but a compare and contrast just makes him appear that he has the courage of his convictions and that he's tough.

I think there should be a whole lot more ads like this one. Talk about pushing back on the "Democrats running scared" narrative.


[ Parent ]
That anti-Blunt radio ad made me smile. :D
Talk about a fresh way to do negative ads.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


It was catchy!
That ad, without a doubt, wins the day! Bonus points for making it a country ditty and making me actually like it.

It's a commercial people will actually want to listen to, and flooding rural areas with it will be relatively cheap--cheaper than TV, certainly. Hello, Carnahan overperformance in rural areas!    

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
OH-18: That link does not show the ad.
Just a CQ Politics entry about it.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


CA-Gov: That was quick, Clinton endorses Brown
http://latimesblogs.latimes.co...

Glad to see that Clinton is looking to build party unity after that meg Whitman ad and Browns little scuff about Monica Lewinsky.

If only he would cut an ad for Brown...

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)


FL-Gov: Rick Scott making a state election about Obama is asinine.
You're not running for Senate, for pete's sake!  Stick to state, not national issues if you wanna win (not that I want him to).

Also, here's a good campaign theme for Rick Scott:


Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


SD-At Large
Yeesh. I half expected that Herseth Sandlin ad to include the line "I am not a Democrat".  

Whatever it takes to win...
As long as she still occassionally votes like a resident.  

[ Parent ]
Not resident, Democrat!
Sorry, it's been a long day.  

[ Parent ]
About the Rass/Fox News polls thing
So, it's called Pulse Opinion Research and it's a Rass spin off. Basically, anybody can pay them $1500 for a poll of any race in the country. That's pretty awesome actually.

Lentz and Murphy
representing the Philly accent. It's pretty unique.  

Almost unnoticed
The president's approval tick upwards. This can only help.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/142...


Obama has been trending upwards
It started the last week in August, and it's starting to build steam.  Three weeks ago, the pollster.com trendline for Obama approval was pointed downward, a week ago it was flat, and now it may start to turn upward if a few more good data points come in.  

Honestly, it's all those friggin Rassmussen data points that have brought O's overall numbers down.  From here until the election we're going to get a lot more data from firms like NBC/WSJ, ABC/Washington Post, Reuters, Battleground, Hotline, etc, and many others who haven't been in the field.  Most of those are probably going to be more favorable than good ole Scotty Rass.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


[ Parent ]
Indeed
August seems to be the nadir every year. I was also heartened by this from PPP regarding the enthusiasm gap. I thought it likely but it is good to see empirical evidence.

http://publicpolicypolling.blo...


[ Parent ]
Not just Rasmussen
>Honestly, it's all those friggin Rassmussen data points that have brought O's overall numbers down.  

This is not true, alas. Yes, Rasmussen's prez approval numbers tend to be less favourable for Obama than other pollsters'. But the downward curve in Obama's ratings in July and August  was not limited to Rasmussen. In fact, Rasmussen didn't show one at all - its numbers stayed pretty stable throughout July and August. It was the other pollsters that showed deteriorating approval ratings for Obama in July and the first half of August.

You can check this by using the Tools function on the pollster.com chart. Switch to more sensitive smoothing, and zoom in on the polling since July 1 and the 35%-65% percentage range so you can get a good look. The trendline didn't move much: from 46% approval / 49% disapproval early July to 45%/51% by mid-August: a swing of 3% against Obama. But now filter out Rasmussen. The trendline changes and becomes more volatile. What it now shows is a shift from 46%/46% early July to 44%/51% by mid-August: a swing of 7% against Obama.

In short, public opinion did seem to shift against Obama between 1 July and mid-August, and it wasn't Rasmussen showing this, but other pollsters, notably Time, Ipsos, Gallup and YouGov.

There is a bright side. Since mid- to late-August, Obama's numbers have seemed to improve a little again, as you pointed out. Rasmussen's numbers kept roughly bouncing around in the same range. But if you filter out Rasmussen, the same downward curve that then appears in July and early August has partly reversed again since. He's now at 46%/48%, without Rasmussen  - still worse than in early July but an improvement on mid-August.*

________
*Course, the statistical noise becomes pretty large once you start zooming into a short timeperiod and filtering out pollsters.]

38, Male, SP, NL / LMP, HU


[ Parent ]
NY
Just voted in NY with the new system.

Voted for Rice and Gillibrand.  Surprised that was all there was for me to vote for.

I don't understand why switch from the Levers to this?  Doesn't this just waste a ton of paper and markers?  Weren't the levers very accurate?  Doesn't make sense to make this switch.

29/D/Male/NY-01


OMG it's Tekzilla!!!
OK, um, er... keeping this on topic...

SurveyUSA has a new poll out for NC-Sen showing Richard Burr (R) crushing Elaine Marshall (D) by 24 points, 58%-34%.  And yes, like their other polls this summer, Burr's winning young people over.


[ Parent ]
Nonsense
Even Rasmussen has 54-38. Trust PPP here. Still, no doubt in my mind Burr will win.

[ Parent ]
PPP trust addendum
Here, there and everywhere.

[ Parent ]
NC
The one the only...

No way is Burr up that much.

29/D/Male/NY-01


[ Parent ]
PPP is doing another "where should we poll?", but with only one day to respond
Choices are CO, CT, WA, WV, and WI. I chose WV.

Good news
for Jerry Brown.

Former President Bill Clinton endorsed Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown today just two days after Brown mocked him during a campaign appearance. Brown apologized yesterday for that statement, in which he questioned Clinton's honesty and joked about the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

Clinton issued his endorsement in a statement to The Los Angeles Times, saying, "I strongly support Jerry Brown for governor because I believe he was a fine mayor of Oakland, he's been a very good attorney general, and he would be an excellent governor at a time when California needs his creativity and fiscal prudence."

"Moreover, the tough campaign we fought 18 years ago is not relevant to the choice facing Californians today," Clinton said. "Jerry and I put that behind us a long time ago."

Read more: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capito...

19, Male, Independent, CA-12


Fox News polling
>When a gigantic slew of polls for Fox News came out, showing, as one might expect from Fox, bad results for Democrats

Actually, the national polls that Fox commissions from Opinion Dynamics aren't usually particularly bad for Democrats, they tend to be in line with the results from other pollsters. At least this was the case for the horserace polls in the presidential elections from 2008 and 2004, which I tracked  pretty closely.

Fox/Op Dyn polling on presidential approval ratings does show a relatively low approval of Obama compared to what other pollsters find, but this is not a anti-Dem house effect but an anti-President house effect. The Fox polls showed similarly low presidential approval ratings for Bush.

38, Male, SP, NL / LMP, HU



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox