Google Ads


Site Stats

CO, CT, GA, and MN Primary Results

by: Crisitunity

Wed Aug 11, 2010 at 2:19 PM EDT


Colorado: What looked like a hotly contested race on the Democratic side of the Senate race (thanks to a mixed bag of poll results, including an Andrew Romanoff lead according to SurveyUSA) turned into a fairly comfortable win for Michael Bennet in the end. Propped up by Obama and DSCC help, and weathering a last-minute patented hit job from the New York Times, Bennet won 54-46. Maybe this'll help put to sleep two memes that are getting very very tiresome: that it's an "anti-incumbent year," and that Obama endorsees all lose. Bennet will face off against Ken Buck, who defeated Jane Norton in the GOP primary 52-48. Polls haven't been conclusive in terms of whether Dems should have wanted to face off against Buck or Norton. Buck gets lumped in with Sharron Angle and Rand Paul because of his teabagger proclivities, but he's considerably more skilled than they are; nevertheless, he still seems gaffe-prone and irritable, so I'll take him.

Dan Maes won the GOP gubernatorial nod, 51-49. The only way things could have gone better for Dems in the GOP gubernatorial race would be if Maes' margin had been small enough to force a recount. The risk here was that irreparably-damaged Scott McInnis would win and then, being a good GOP team player, promptly drop out, allowing a better Republican (Jane Norton?) to take his place, which would then drive Tom Tancredo out of his indie bid. Maes has vowed to fight on, though, and his underwhelming presence is likely to keep Tancredo in the race, meaning not one but two guys not just spewing the crazy, but splitting the crazy vote and ensuring Gov. John Hickenlooper.

Finally, in Colorado, the GOP House primaries were uneventful wins for establishment candidates, with Ryan Frazier beating Lang Sias 64-36 in CO-07 and Scott Tipton beating Bob McConnell (Sarah Palin's other losing endorsee yesterday) winning 56-44 in CO-03.

Connecticut: Probably the biggest surprise of the night was the 58-42 victory by former Stamford mayor Dan Malloy over Ned Lamont in the Democratic gubernatorial primary, seeing as how Lamont had led all polls (although polls did capture a late and rapid Malloy surge). The lesson here mostly boils down to one more race where the organizational power of the local political establishment was able to overcome the money of a rich outsider, but there's one other story here that Dem message-setters will hopefully notice. Judging by when polls saw the race tigthen, the wheels seemed to come off Lamont's campaign with a late round of attack ads that focused on layoffs at Lamont's company. Taking not just that but the air war in the PA-12 special in mind (where Mark Critz won in large measure by hammering Tim Burns over outsourcing), it really seems like, despite this year's overarching CW, voters will go for a "career politician" over a self-described job-creating outsider businessman, once it's made clear that said businessman's interest in jobs only extends as far as his own bottom line.

Malloy will face a flawed Tom Foley in November, and based on general election polling recently should be considered a slight favorite. Foley won the GOP primary narrowly over Lt. Governor Michael Fedele and Oz Griebel 42-39-19. Also, for the GOP, Linda McMahon unsurprisingly won the GOP primary in the face of Rob Simmons' half-assed comeback-type-thing. Simmons and Paulist economist Peter Schiff did keep her under 50% though: 49-28-23. McMahon faces Richard Blumenthal in November, who already launched his first TV ad this morning, shirking a no-doubt-tempting smackdown in favor of... what's that thing that McMahon doesn't have... oh, yeah. Dignity. The three GOP House primaries led to expected victories for Janet Peckinpaugh in CT-02 (43-38 over Daria Novak), Dan Debicella in CT-04 (60-24 over Rob Merkle), and Sam Caligiuri in CT-05 (40-32-28 over Justin Bernier and Mark Greenberg).

Georgia: The main event in Georgia was the GOP gubernatorial runoff, and hoo boy, did it live up to its billing. The two candidates finished in recount territory at 50-50, with Nathan Deal leading Karen Handel by 2,500 votes. Unfortunately, Handel just conceded this morning rather than following through with the recount, so Dem nominee Roy Barnes doesn't get to spend weeks watching them keep fighting it out. Pundits will no doubt focus on the proxy war aspects of the battle ("Huck beats Palin!"), but the outcome seems to have more to do with Deal consolidating conservative votes outside the Atlanta area, where Handel's anti-corruption, anti-good-ol'-boyism message may have fallen flat.

We also had outcomes in three GOP House primaries, one to determine the nominee in a Likely Dem race, and the others to determine who's the next Rep. in dark-red districts. In GA-07, establishment-backed former John Linder CoS Rob Woodall beat teabagging radio talker Jody Hice, 56-44. In GA-09, Rep. Tom Graves won his fourth (and probably final) faceoff against Lee Hawkins, 55-45. And in GA-12, Ray McKinney beat Carl Smith 62-38 for the right to take on Rep. John Barrow. If you want to argue that this year's crop of Republican candidates is radioactive, you don't need to look any further than McKinney; he's a nuclear power plant project manager by day.

Minnesota: Finally, there was only one race worth watching last night in Minnesota, and it turned out to be a barnburner: the DFL gubernatorial primary. State House speaker (and DFL endorsee) Margaret Anderson Kelliher led most of the night based on her strength in the Twin Cities, but as results trickled in from the rest of the state, ex-Sen. Mark Dayton crept into the lead. In the end, despite having convincing pre-primary poll leads, Dayton won 41-40-18 over Kelliher and Matt Entenza. Dayton pretty clearly benefited not only from his statewide familiarity, but also from picking a running mate from Duluth, where he cleaned up, late in the game. With a 7,000 margin separating them, Kelliher didn't concede last night... but she did this morning, meaning Dayton faces the increasingly woeful GOP nominee Tom Emmer in November. The most recent spate of polls has given Dayton double-digits advantages in that matchup.

Crisitunity :: CO, CT, GA, and MN Primary Results
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The main thing is that
Survey USA was way off in the both the Minnesota Gubernatorial race and in Colorado. Is it just me or has the quality of their work actually decreased with the decreasing quantity, (they don't poll anywhere near as much stuff as I remember them polling as recently as 2006). I'm starting to really not trust them; what with their tendency to push undecideds very hard, their odd crosstabs, and the odd outliers from them here and there.  

w/r/t MN-Gov, MAK did have the party endorsement
and I did see MAK stuff on party trucks when I was in MN in June --

which suggests a DFL party endorsement has a positive GOTV effect in a primary of about 10-15 points.  


[ Parent ]
Dayton
I really hope that MAK voters come around to Dayton. Dayton has had his faults, but he is infinitely better than Emmer.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


I really can't see that being a problem.
The polls don't show it as one, and Kelliher's supporters were probably more liberal than Dayton's, on average.

[ Parent ]
Liberal
I don't know if you could say there is a liberal/moderate divide on this at all. Both Kelliher and Dayton are very very liberal politicians. Entenza was the "moderate" choice, and he is on the quite liberal end of the spectrum. What would give you the impression that her voters would be the more liberal ones?

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Oh, I certainly didn't mean to imply anything about Dayton.
He's fine; I would probably have voted for him if I lived in Minnesota.

[ Parent ]
I didn't vote
I didn't have a horse in that race. And I am not a fan of voting just for the sake of voting, especially when I didn't care who won. Now that Dayton is the nominee, I will do everything I can to get him elected, but I honestly was very neutral about who would win last night.

On a side note, having an outstate Lt. Governor nominee with a candidate from Minneapolis should probably help him. the Metro-Outstate divide in Minnesota is huge, even if there is not a lot of daylight politically between a Minneapolis voter and an Iron Range voter. That sort of balance will help against the Republican ticket which has two "cityots"

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Lean Dem?
What more data is needed to call this race Lean Dem?  TPM shows Dayton with a 10.5 point lead over Emmer in the tracker.

[ Parent ]
Likely Dem
If Emmer finds a cure for cancer he has a chance, but otherwise, nope.

[ Parent ]
Republicans in CO skipping Gov primary
Number of votes in Sen primary: 407,110
Number of votes in Gov primary: 387,769
Difference: 19,341. A lot of people weren't too happy about their choices for gov.

Hoping
What was the general hope in the Republican circles? Was the ideal situation actually having McInnis win it, then withdraw from the race?

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Yes
Then the state GOP central committee could pick a new candidate (rumor was Jane Norton, who is inoffensive but, in my opinion, weak sauce).  The added benefit would have been Tancredo dropping his quixotic and lovely third party bid.

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
So actually
a hopeful thinking GOP voter should have really made the effort to vote for McInnis, on the hopeful assumption he'd drop out, (and be replaced) which would also then see Tancredo going away.

Otherwise with Maes in, Tancredo is apparently definitely in.


[ Parent ]
MN-Gov. One other race,
which may or may not ultimately be of any significance, is the Independence Party nominating ex-GOP guy Tom Horner rather than the usual ex-Dem they often have in the past.

The rumored GOP effort to get folks to crossover and vote in the IP primary to have a weaker indy candidate Hahn than Horner win obviously didn't work.

Hopefully this time around, the Independence Party will be swiping more soft GOP Governor votes than DFL votes in November.


I did pretty well last night
was 1.5% off on Georgia, but got Woodall and Graves victories right, (didn't posit specific numbers though not knowing enough).

I hit Fedele's number just right in CT at 38%, but screwed everything else up there, but it's just as well, I don't know the state well.

I was rooting for MAK, but she came up just short like I knew she probably would.

I got CO-SEN right, but was a little too optimistic for Romanoff, giving 48%, and a little too optimistic for Ken Buck, giving 53%. The big thing I got wrong was overstating Maes margin by about 9 points.


One note of caution before we do a victory dance on CO-SE
Some of you probably saw this in Sam Stein's article on HuffPuff

"The losing candidate in the Republican race, former Lt. Gov Jane Norton, actually earned more votes (197,143) than the winning candidate in the Democratic primary, Sen. Michael Bennet (183,521)."

Crisitunity hinted at this in his commentary, but Ken Buck may not be as easy to beat as some people think - he's no Angle. It might be tough for Bennett to make an election all about "high heels."

(Colorado Governor, OTOH, I'm not the least bit worried about. I am doing a victory dance right now on that one, which is bringing some stares at the coffee house).


This argument has been suggested too much
It can be disproven about a million times over, as turnout during the primary really isn't a predictor of the GE.  Ryan_in_Delco tried using this to prove the PA was going to flip up to 8 GOP seats Republican this year.  Its just not ture, its not anythign we need to worry about in and of itself.

First, you have to look at open versus closed primaries.  Then you have to look at turnout figures as a percent of registered voters overall and by party (if its closed).

Recently, in Colorado:
Beauprez got 50,000 more votes than Ritter in 2006 primaries, Ritter won.  Bob Schaeffer got 45,000 more votes in the 2008 primary than Mark udall, and Udall won.  

So it appears in Colorado, the Republican primaries tend to draw more voters regardless of its contested or not (The 2 races I listed I thinkS chaeffer was contested by Coors but I dont think Beauprez was severely contested).  When the GE comes around, Dems win.


[ Parent ]
Well
If Bennet chooses to start wearing high heels, he can make the race about that.  

[ Parent ]
Thanks rdw...
Very pertinent information - although, curious, did either Ritter or Udall have a contested primary that year? I'm pretty sure the latter did not. What worried me about the turnout figures this year is both sides had fiercely competitive primaries.  

[ Parent ]
I dont think either had serious
Conteneders for those two races.  To me that even furthers the point that the primary turnout doesn't matter.  I mean Schaeffer-Coors must have been WAY higher than Udall but Udall won.  I don't tend to see McInnis-Maes all that different.  Maes is Schaeffer and Coors is McInnis (with more $$$ and less experience).

Heck Pete Coors might have been a great re-tread for the GOP to have run this year.

My only point is don't let primary turnout drive you to believeing the hype of the GOP wave.  Its using the story to prove the facts, rather than vice versa.  

I think we'll see just as many House seats flip to the GOP where Dem primary vote counts exceeded GOP flip as vice versa.  And history tells us that certain areas, especially when there is a closed primary and independent voters are swingy and large in number, that primary turnout is about as predictive as phrenology.


[ Parent ]
Hrm...
CO-Sen: I suspect this was the best result Dems could've hoped for. My only fear is I sensed a greater stubborn-ness among Romanoff supporters to embrace Bennet, than I did Norton's crowd to Buck. Perhaps I'm wrong, but, either way, I don't think Bennet necessarily runs away with this. Buck's prone to gaffes, but he can still prevail in an environment this bad. Toss-up, edge Dem.

CO-Gov: Speaking of stubborn, Tom Tancredo. It's all in his corner. If he opts to step aside for Maes, which strikes me as rather unlikely, this is a Lean Dem race, perhaps even Likely Dem. If my suspicions hold, though, and Tancredo sticks around, this is surely Safe-to-Likely Dem. Hickenlooper's a terrific candidate, and only a Jane Norton could threaten his bid.

CT-Sen: McMahon's victory wasn't exactly daunting, but, in the wake of that Quinnipiac 10-pointer, I'm intrigued to see if she can close this thing a bit. My guess is Simmons gives her a soft endorsement, and she basically coalesces the GOP base. Keep an eye on Joe Lieberman - if she makes this a single-digit race, he may re-think his hesitancy to endorse here. I think the real crowd to watch here is female Independents. Lean Dem.

CT-Gov: I have to say, I've thought all-along Dan Malloy would prove a more formidable general election candidate than Ned Lamont. Something about the latter's candidacy struck me as lacking in fresh-ness. Likewise, I thought Michael Fedele would've been a better GOP nominee than Tom Foley, and, thus, this is the best match-up Dems could've hoped for. I suspect Foley performs 3-5% weaker than McMahon. Likely Dem.

MN-Gov: I guess Mark Dayton can take some solace in that he's more Dan Coats than Ned Lamont, but this was still a pretty piss-poor victory here. And, you just know some of MAK's supporters are gonna be awfully hesistant to embrace him. The good news is Tom Emmer's a flawed GOP candidate. Watch Independents on this one. Toss-up, edge Dem.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


Disagree on MN-Gov
I don't think you're taking into account that Tom Emmer, in addition to being too conservative for the state, is just not that smart and is prone to gaffes. Dayton has also won statewide election before. And, the independent candidate this year is a moderate Republican rather than a conservative Democrat. I think it's at least Lean Dem. I do think MAK would have been a slightly better choice, however.  

[ Parent ]
Late surges
We've been seeing a lot of those lately.

Who'd have thought this would be such a good strategy?

I was honestly very surprised at not only Malloy's win but his margin.  I thought Lamont was going to win by a few percent.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


I just hope
Lamont steers clear of the Senate race in 2012.  We have 2 other good Dem candidates who could win that.  Lamont unfortunately has shown he's just not electable.

Hopefully Malloy gives him a carrot, guy has tons of money already so he doesn't need a job, so maybe he can be part of a commission or task force on bringing tech industry to the state or some other gibberish-y post.


[ Parent ]
What's wrong with Lamont?
I'd vote for him; I like his refreshing style and I think he could be an innovative leader.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
The Politico
article about Lamont's loss sums it up perfectly. Lamont caught lighting in a bottle in 2006 (Iraq, George W. Bush, Joe Lieberman) and he couldn't capture it again.

Personally if Lamont wants to serve in public office he should start out small. Maybe state representative or senator and work his way up the ladder. It'll be easier for him to run for statewide office in the future if he pays his dues to the CT Democratic party than try to be an insurgent.  

19, Male, Independent, CA-12


[ Parent ]
So what's next for Romanoff?
I don't hold too much of the negative stuff from a primary campaign against him, since I doubt it has a lasting impact.  Guy simply wanted to move up.  

Does Hickenlooper have to appoint any important statewide officials?  Or is Romanoff bound for lobbying?


Buying a house?


[ Parent ]
He's a wonk and a legislative type at that
So, barring any last minute state senate openings or blue ribbon commissions (and I don't see any), I think he's think-tank bound, either locally with the Bell Policy Center or Bighorn Center for Public Policy or maybe even at the Center for American Progress if he decides he still wants to be around D.C.

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
Lobbyist?
No, well maybe I suppose. Everyone knows I am not fond of him but I think he will land on his feat. If he wants to make a comeback what he needs to do is run for a low level office in the near future, like Treasurer or SoS. Just so he is relevant. It may be a while until he is able to make a serious comeback like Gov, Senate or House. Like I said if he still wants to serve then he should start small so he is still relevant, CO has a big bench as it is.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Got it
What about Mayor of Denver? That is an off year election right? Perfect. Well he may have to primary the person who takes over when Hickenlooper leaves but I do not think that would be a problem for him considering his record.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Mayors are the quintessential managers job
If he just wants a placeholder job, that might work.  Sec State after Bernie Buescher is term limited would be nice, but that won't be for awhile.  As for Treasurer, that'll be Cary Kennedy's for as long as she wants it (my guess is she'll run for Governor after Hickenlooper is up if he wins).  But if you mean, does he really WANT to be mayor...I doubt it.  He doesn't fit the personality type.  He's an ideas guy, not a manager or an executive.  

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
Grim night for the GOP
Four states and they come out of the night with only two tossups, Ga-Gov and Co-Sen, with the Dems having the stronger candidate in both races.  Everything else is either Safe or Likely Dem.

well
there goes the Lamont ad/twitterfeed on the side of SSP.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox