Google Ads


Site Stats

IA-Gov news roundup

by: desmoinesdem

Fri Jul 02, 2010 at 3:23 PM EDT


I've been posting less often at Swing State Project lately because Iowa campaign news is keeping me busy at my home blog, Bleeding Heartland. From time to time I will keep SSPers up to date on our highest-profile races: Roxanne Conlin's bid against five-term Republican Senator Chuck Grassley and Democratic Governor Chet Culver's re-election campaign against four-term former Governor Terry Branstad.

After the jump you'll find lots of links on the Iowa governor's race since Branstad won the June 8 primary with about 50 percent of the vote to 41 percent for Bob Vander Plaats and 9 percent for Rod Roberts.

desmoinesdem :: IA-Gov news roundup
Vander Plaats ran to Branstad's right during the primary, slamming the former governor's record of growing government while feeding on wingnut anger about government-run health care, immigration and of course same-sex marriage rights in Iowa. Although Branstad spent several times more money during the first five months of the year, Vander Plaats was able to outperform his poll numbers on June 8. A post-primary meeting between the two candidates reportedly "did not go well," as Branstad rebuffed Vander Plaats' desire to be on the ticket. Consequently, Vander Plaats still hasn't endorsed Branstad and is leaving the door open to running for governor as an independent. (Iowa is one of the few states without a sore loser law.) I doubt Vander Plaats will take the plunge for reasons described here, but if he does, he may help Culver by drawing some Republican votes away from Branstad.

Immediately after the primary, Iowa politics-watchers hashed out who was and wasn't on Branstad's short list for lieutenant governor. Some well-connected Republicans thought he would choose former State Senator Jeff Lamberti, who was the 2006 GOP nominee against Congressman Leonard Boswell in IA-03. Two days before the Republican state convention, Branstad picked little-known first-term State Senator Kim Reynolds, signaling that he plans to focus on fiscal issues during the general election campaign. I covered reaction to that pick here. Normally the state convention vote on the governor's running mate is a formality, but Branstad must have been worried about how Reynolds would go over with party activists, because his campaign hit convention delegates with robocalls and e-mails emphasizing Reynolds' social conservative credentials. On June 24, a sitting state legislator put Vander Plaats' name in nomination for lieutenant governor, and delegates picked Reynolds over Vander Plaats by a surprisingly narrow margin of 56 percent to 44 percent. I discussed the divisions in the Iowa GOP here.

Branstad has stayed up on television since the primary, running this ad that glosses over his own record and lies about how Culver has managed state finances. It's notable that Branstad bashes so-called Democratic "overspending" but never explains how he would have balanced the state budget during a recession without dipping into reserve funds or using federal stimulus money. Lieutenant Governor candidate Reynolds also criticizes teacher layoffs and Democratic budget policies, never acknowledging that education cuts would have been far worse without the federal stimulus bill all the Republicans opposed.

Meanwhile, Culver has run two television commercials since the primary. One covered Branstad's dismal record on fiscal issues, which is "not worth repeating." The other started a conversation about Branstad's values, noting that he sought pay raises multiple times while cutting spending on things like foster care.

Culver picked up a couple of endorsements this month that should help his ground game in the general election. The Planned Parenthood PAC's support was never in doubt, but Branstad reportedly tried hard to discourage the Iowa State Education Association from backing Culver. (The state's largest teacher's union had backed Branstad during his third gubernatorial campaign in 1990.) Branstad's call for eliminating the state-funded preschool program probably hurt him with the ISEA.

The only public poll since the Iowa primary was conducted by Rasmussen, which found Branstad enjoying his largest-ever lead, 57 percent to 31 percent. Most Iowa Democrats believe the race is closer than that, but Culver is clearly in a hole.

Revenues for the fiscal year that just ended were better than expected, but that hasn't stopped Republican zombie lies about a "budget deficit."

Branstad started running a new tv ad this week, promising "honest, open and scandal-free government." Culver's campaign responded by releasing 400 pages of documents showing how Branstad and his top aides did campaign work on the public's dime while he was governor. I discussed the document dump at Bleeding Heartland.  It will be interesting to see what other material the Culver campaign uncovers in the 1,000 boxes they've been going through in the state archives.

Jonathan Narcisse is running for governor as an independent after flaking out on plans to challenge Chet Culver in the Democratic primary. I don't think he will be a factor.

Share any thoughts about the Iowa governor's race in this thread.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Methinks Culver is toast, and I only hope Conlin helps us save the legislature......
That's really what Iowa Democrats can salvage this November, having enough to offer in the U.S. Senate race to gin up enough turnout to save Democratic control of the chambers.

How is that looking, by the way?  What's the chatter?

Regarding Culver, I suppose if the state economy really picks up faster than the rest of the country, and Culver turns it around and runs a great campaign, he might have a shot at a big upset.  But really his constant senior staff turnover and the fact he's not personally well-regarded makes me very doubtful he's capable of doing that.  Culver is no Ted Strickland.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


working on lots of posts
about the Iowa statehouse races.

We will certainly hold the Iowa Senate, where our current majority is 32-18. I think a net loss of 2-3 seats is likely. A net loss of 4-5 seats would be a good night for the Republicans. A net loss of 1 seat would be fantastic for us. The real battle for the Iowa Senate will be in 2012, because who knows what the districts will look like when they're redrawn.

The Iowa House is more dicey. I think we have a better than 50/50 chance of holding the majority, though. Incumbents are working very hard at direct voter contacts, and the Iowa Democratic Party's early voting program should help us hold a few seats we "should" lose in a Republican wave year.

Quite a few Iowans still split their tickets. I think a decent number of House and Senate Democrats will survive in districts carried by Grassley and Branstad.

I also think Culver's got a good staff in place now, and the race will tighten. Putting together those Branstad files was an impressive piece of work.  No doubt it's an uphill battle for Culver, but some of Branstad's positions that were uncontroversial in the GOP primary will be unpopular with the broader electorate. If Culver can highlight those, Branstad makes some mistakes, and 5 percent of the wingnuts stay home or vote Libertarian, we have a chance of holding IA-Gov.


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox