Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 6/17 (Afternoon Edition)

by: Crisitunity

Thu Jun 17, 2010 at 3:07 PM EDT


AK-Sen: It looks like that unexpected Sarah Palin endorsement may have put Joe Miller on the map, in his challenge from the right to Lisa Murkowksi in the GOP Senate primary. Now he's gotten the backing of the Tea Party Express. Of course, it remains to be seen whether the libertarian-minded teabagger message has much resonance in Alaska; remember, at the end of the day, Alaska Republicans like their federal goodies a lot (hence the staying power of Ted Stevens and Don Young).

IL-Sen: Could a factual dispute over Mark Kirk claims that he taught at a nursery school actually succeed in taking him down yet another peg? Kirk mentioned in a 2006 speech that he'd been a teacher, worrying about what kid might bring a gun to class. After questions arose as to whether Kirk had ever actually taught, his campaign clarified that it was a reference to his time working for one semester at a nursery school in Ithaca, New York. If even the preschool-age children of Cornell professors are taking guns to class, we're in a lot more trouble than I'd thought. There's also one other weird Illinois item out today: the 7th Circuit just ruled that there needs to be a special election to fill Barack Obama's seat, after all. That's about a year too late to be relevant, considering that Roland Burris's tenure is almost over. But it may yet result in a special election coinciding with the November general election, which would presumably mean that Alexi Giannoulias or Kirk would get to serve in the lame-duck session and get a smidge more all-important seniority. [UDPATE: Actually, because there's no "irreparable harm," the 7th Circuit didn't order a special election even though they said there probably should have been one; instead, they sent the case back down to the district court.]

SC-Sen: Guess who's back all of a sudden, now that there's a gaping hole where a competent candidate should be in South Carolina? Supporters of Linda Ketner, who last year declined a re-run in SC-01 (where she'd run well in 2008), are floating her name for a Senate run. Since it doesn't look like Alvin Greene is getting off the Democratic ballot line (after the state election commission today said they aren't getting involved), the deep-pocketed Ketner would need to run as an independent instead. Ketner, herself, hasn't said anything about a bid though.

CA-Gov: Why walk back to the center after winning your primary, when you can make one frantic, implausible leap instead? After getting pulled to the right by Steve Poizner in the primary, now Meg Whitman is saying "No, no, I love immigrants," in a Spanish-language TV ad that'll debut during today's Mexico/France World Cup game. She says she opposed Arizona's new immigration law and opposed Califorina's 1994 Prop 187, too.

FL-Gov: Indie candidate Bud Chiles isn't getting the warmest of welcomes in his newly-launched bid; news reports are surfacing of his involvement in a real estate development flop in a small Panhandle town. Chiles is a defendant in seven different lawsuits, either foreclosure suits or suits over leases of construction equipment. Whether or not that sticks, though, there's also an institutional disparity showing up in how state Dems are viewing him, versus how they're viewing Charlie Crist's independent candidacy: Palm Beach Co. Commissioner Burt Aaronson has gone public in wanting Chiles to get out the gubernatorial race while being fine with Crist staying in the Senate race.

ME-Gov: This morning we linked to an article musing that moderate Maine Republicans might defect to the independent candidacy of Eliot Cutler, rather support the hard-right Paul LePage. Unfortunately, visions of cat fud dancing in our heads were dashed by a unity rally today where all six losing GOP candidates, even the decidedly moderate state Sen. Peter Mills, endorsed LePage.

MI-Gov: There's one more poll of the gubernatorial primaries in Michigan, this time for Inside Michigan Politics. On the GOP side, they find Peter Hoekstra leading at 21, followed by Rick Snyder at 15, Mike Cox and Mike Bouchard with 10 each, and Tom George at 1. The Democratic primary has Andy Dillon at 14 and Virg Bernero at 10, with a whopping 76% undecided.

MN-Gov: The AFL-CIO has decided to follow the lead of the SEIU, and not make an endorsement in the Democratic primary, where a variety of labor-friendly candidates are competing.

NH-01: I wonder if this is just personal animosity at work, or if there's a larger story here? Manchester mayor Ted Gatsas endorsed in the GOP primary in the 1st, and rather than endorse his immediate mayoral predecessor (and presumed frontrunner) Frank Guinta, he backed Sean Mahoney instead.

NY-20: Here's some good news for Rep. Scott Murphy, who between strong fundraising and third-tier opposition, is already having a pretty good electoral cycle: he's been endorsed for the Independence Party's ballot line this year. It's sharp contrast to neighboring Rep. Mike Arcuri, whose all-cycle-long woes just got added-to by the IP endorsement going to GOP opponent Richard Hanna.

OH-13: According to the Fix, Tom Ganley is out with an internal poll from POS that gives him a 3-point lead (44-41) over Rep. Betty Sutton. I'm wondering about the date on the poll, though (which they don't discuss), as there were rumblings all the way back in mid-February, when Ganley switched over from the Senate race where he was flailing in the GOP primary to the 13th, that Ganley had an internal poll giving him a 3-point lead (although that was the only detail given). Or, maybe he's just polling verrrrrry consistently.

SC-04: Big-time tension down at Bob Jones University! The school's arts and sciences dean endorsed GOP primary challenger Trey Gowdy several months ago, but now the school's former chancellor (and grandson of its founder) Bob Jones III has come out in support of incumbent Bob Inglis instead.

AL-Ag Comm.: He might have lost the primary, but he won the media war, becoming a minor celebrity along the way thanks to his bizarre ad going viral. And now he's back: third-place finisher Dale Peterson is endorsing John McMillan, and appearing in an ad where he not only touts McMillan but tells "that dummy" (presumably Dorman Grace) to go back to his chicken farm, and, for good measure, fires a shotgun at a no-good political-sign rustler.

Louisiana: After a few years of doing it more or less normally, Louisiana is going back to its unique system of jungle primary and runoff for its federal-level races, starting in 2012. Supporters of the switch back say it'll save money by not requiring separate primaries. (H/t Johnny Longtorso.)

Polltopia: Today's must read, if you haven't seen it already, is a lengthy profile of Scott Rasmussen in the Washington Post. While it has some backstory on Rasmussen's pre-polling days, the real meat here is a good rundown of what polling experts think Rasmussen may be doing wrong, and some interesting speculation on the future direction of the polling business.

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 6/17 (Afternoon Edition)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Rasmussen
Pretty unsatisfactory answer to the transparency question.

NC-02: Etheridge Trails
http://politicalwire.com/archi...
I don't know much about the pollster. Are they credible? I see they are a Republican firm though. Are they one of the better ones?  

According to their website it was done for them by SurveyUSA
So it seems legit to me.

[ Parent ]
SurveyUSA likes to do polls....
...that say what their sponsor wants them to say, which is why they've had so many outliers lately.

I'd like to hear some confirmation from people on the ground over there... This is certainly a good publicity stunt by the GOP, along with the Breitbart stunt.  I expect to see more ambushes in the future.


[ Parent ]
I agree

This is other opportunist poll.


[ Parent ]
Not surprised that video was brutal!
(Yes the bad pun was intended)

Etheridge should really beat himself up over what he did. He was sailing to an easy re-election until he decided to assult a college kid on the street who was asking annoying questions.

While I think an argument could be made as to whether or not a congressman physcially assulting someone on the street in itself should cost him an election, I think one thing is clear.

Etheridge gave his no name challenger, who had no cash and no chance an opportunity to build a campaign and beat him.

Because of the video she has been able to raise money and give him a race.

This is an R+2 district that went from Safe Dem to Toss up because of Etheridge's temper.

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
the seriousness of the video
Etheridge definitely crossed the line when he actually touched the college kid.  Especially when he touched the neck.  BUT he did not physically harm the college student.  I think that's an important distinction in this incident.  It's possible that voters will let this slide because Etheridge didn't actually hit the student.  They may even sympathize with Etheridge as the student behaved like a stalker; putting his camera right in Etheridge's face and refusing to give his name.

[ Parent ]
Assault?
LOL weak if that's assault.

[ Parent ]
I kinda miss the old days
when people weren't such wimps.  Oh well, still no excuse.  At least Mr. Etheridge made an unconditional, humble apology, unlike Mr. Barton.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Reminiscent of PPP showing
Rob Miller up 1 on Joe Wilson the day after "You Lie!"  Miller's internals have him down double digits now.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
And several polls on Bachmann
Sorry izengabe this is not a tossup. But it sure got competitive.

[ Parent ]
Different district
Wilson is a Republican in a strong Republican district. Etheridge is a Democrat in a Republican district. Also, Etheridge has a voting record that can be used against him now that his opponent will have money. He voted for HCR, for Cap and Trade, and for the stimulus. Not good now that he gave Ellmers an opening. According to Josh from Politico, this race is becoming a top NRCC target. Maybe they have similar internals? She is also expected to be named a "Contender" in Young Guns next week.  

[ Parent ]
And Etheridge is under the threat of indictment
If those kids ever come forward and press charges, which I'm sure they will in the upcoming weeks.

[ Parent ]
I doubt they will
If they would, I'd they they would have by now. Does anyone know that the consequences for him would be if they pressed charges?  

[ Parent ]
Depends on your definition of a Democratic district
The partisan breakdown used by Survey USA is 47D, 32R, 20I, and that seems about right to me.  Obama won the district 52-47 in 2008.  Etheridge won it 68-30.

Putting a "Young Guns" merit badge on Ellmers and dressing her in a cowgirl hat with a toy plastic pistol, or whatever the NRCC does with these people, is not going to change the fact that she has no profile in the district.  May be a more competitive race than before, but it's no toss-up.  By the way, Rob Miller is a way awesome member of the DCCC's Red-to-Blue list.  FEAR HIM!!!

All that said, I think you should gather every cent you have and donate it to Ellmers and to Star Parker in her race against Laura Richardson.  I hear Republican turnout in Compton is going to be HUGE!!!

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
Hah no
Ellmers yes, Parker no. Ellmers is a strong candidate for the district. She is a nurse and her husband is a surgeon, so she may even be able to invest in the race if she needs to. Also, Cook rates it R+2, thats why I said it was a Republican leaning district. Most candidates don't start with a profile in a district when they have never held elective office.  

[ Parent ]
I figured you were basing it on PVI
but it's important to remember that Dems still have huge partisan advantages in parts of the South like this.  It is a challenge for a low profile Republican to pull those Dem voters away from a culturally Southern Democratic candidate.  Not at all impossible, but a challenge.

This is a classic bounce based on external events, and it will probably dissipate as bounces typically do.  I predicted Etheridge to win 58-42 in my diary today.  I'm sticking with it despite this poll.  

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
NJ-Poll
Lautenberg's approval rating is 40-47, and Menendez's is 38-43. What has Lautenberg done to be more unpopular? You would think with his sickness, people would like him more?  

He's been around longer
They hate everybody in NJ.

[ Parent ]
Christie and Obama
Christie and Obama are not doing bad.  The fact that Christie breaks even is remarkable considering the pushback he is getting from the unions.  He is winning the popularity war with the unions too.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

[ Parent ]
We
have only seen two recent polls and one showed Christie breaking even and the other showed him with a 62% disapproval rating. So it hard to say what his approval rating is but I think he is doing worse than breaking even.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
OH-13, oh dear
That one hits a little too close to home for me, literally, seeing as this is my home district.  

Folks, if Betty Sutton, who was seen as unassailable before Ganley and his moneybags showed up, ends up losing, you can forget about keeping the House.  In fact, you can start talking about losses in 50+, maybe even 60+ category.  Virtually every swing seat in the country will flip before this district will, and all those conservadems from R+ districts, well you can kiss them goodbye too if we're dropping strongly D districts with popular incumbents.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


Poll is by POS
Only ARG, IA, and Zogby received worse ratings in 538's pollster ratings. And they have definitely been wrong in many House races by large margins.

[ Parent ]
Forgive me but...
.. what does POS stand for (besides that :) )?

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan

[ Parent ]
"Public Opinion Surveys" or something like that n/t


[ Parent ]
Strategies
They also partnered with the similarly below average GQR for that NPR poll.

[ Parent ]
I have a hard time believing a used car dealer...
...would have that kind of polling in a district such as yours (i.e. Sherrod Brown's old district).

[ Parent ]
With his dealership comes high name rec
His dealership's name is Ganley Chevrolet, so I'm sure people know Tom Ganley. BTW, new car dealer, not used. ;)  

[ Parent ]
Ganley owns tons of dealerships...
...both new and used of every make and model, but car dealers aren't exactly considered to be pinnacles of trust and honor.

[ Parent ]
I pressed submit before finishing....
...continuing from before...

...car dealers in general aren't exactly considered to be pinnacles of trust and honor by the public. It may be an unfair sterotype, but it is what it is...


[ Parent ]
To be fair,
neither are politicians.

I doubt it matters much.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


[ Parent ]
or lawyers
Which is the field I believe most politicians are in before they become politicians.

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
Not really
Special circumstances. No such thing as uniform swing like that. Else can you imagine the size of the Dem majority with the likes of Bobby Bright and Walt Minnick winning in 2008?

[ Parent ]
it's true that candidates matter
But let's face facts conspiracy.  Popular democratic incumbents in democratic districts don't generally lose.  For a republican to win against a non-scandalized incumbent in a district like OH-13, they would need to be a very strong candidate, run a great campaign, have lots of money, hope for a national swing toward the GOP to slant the environment in their favor, and maybe an unforced error or two from the incumbent.  Of those 5, Ganley doesn't have the first one, having never been elected to public office.  Jury is out on the second.  He's got the third and the fourth for sure, and it's extremely unlikely that he'll get the fifth.

That doesn't add up to a victory, IMO.  

Back to the original point of swings not happening uniformly, sure that's true.  But what is true is that the democratic vote share rose virtually everywhere during 2006 and 2008 relative to a normal year, and it is almost certainly going to be higher for the republicans this year.  Now the wave will be higher in some areas than others due to the presence of the 5 factors I laid out in the previous paragraph.  But I have a hard time, actually an extremely hard time believing that a strong incumbent like Betty Sutton can go down, yet many others in less favorable districts will win.  Sure you might have a few stronger swing-district reps like Jason Altmire or Gabrielle Giffords survive, after all Jim Gerlach and Dave Reichert made it through 2006/2008.  But, most freshman reps will end up losing.  And woe is anybody from a district R+10 or worse if D+5's are falling.  Currently Joseph Cao and Charles Djou are the only members of the GOP in D+10 or better districts (and they'll probably be gone in November) so it's not realistic to think that guys like Chet Edwards and Lincoln Davis are going to hang on.  If the wave is reaching high enough to knock out the Sutton's of the House, unless the amplitude of the wave is more than 40% of the vote (extremely doubtful), then math says Edwards and Davis are outta here.

Maybe RuralDem or somebody can make a case for a world in which Betty Sutton, Leonard Boswell, David Wu, and other blue-district reps get knocked out and yet Bobby Bright, Leonard Davis, and Chet Edwards still survive, but I just don't see it as plausible.    

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


[ Parent ]
One thing I forgot
Those races you picked, ID-1 and AL-2, were won largely because the republicans nominated a shit candidate in ID-1, and they had a ridiculously bloody primary battle in AL-2.  Neither situation applies here.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13

[ Parent ]
No but Ganley has big money
And Sutton was caught unprepared. Childers, Teague, Kirkpatrick, Perriello, Nye, Boccieri, Dahlkemper, Schauer, Grayson, Foster, Adler and Halvorson all won in GOP districts with a PVI of anything up to R+14. Republicans held literally hundreds inbetween.

[ Parent ]
Big money and free advertising
His car dealer's ad strategy has changed to emphasize the Ganley brand. New slogan: "You can trust the Ganley name" (or some variation). Often his commercials just have him or his brother speaking with no footage of cars or mention of prices.

Boccieri's opponent is also a car dealer, I'm wondering if this is a trend elsewhere in the country?

Sutton can and most likely will survive this, but I do think she was caught a bit off guard and is hopefully putting together a strong organization this summer for the fall.  

33, male, Dem, OH-13


[ Parent ]
It depends on the degree of nationalization
not in the "socialist" sense, but w/r/t issues. If the election is fully nationalized, lesser quality candidates in D districts may go down.

But I believe, at least as of this time, at least many House elections will be decided by local issues and thus the quality of the candidate.

Under those circumstances, --at least some-- high quality D candidates from red districts can and will survive. And that means Chet Edwards, Bright, maybe even Perillo.

OTOH, there is clearly some effect from the economy, perhaps even the oil disaster in the gulf on such elections.

So while higher quality candidates can expect to outperform "generic incumbent D" in such districts, they're not completely immune from such factors.


[ Parent ]
People love the 1994 comparison
Well, plenty Dems survived in very Republican districts while others in more friendly territory lost.

[ Parent ]
There will be a lot more close calls
for stronger D candidates. But that's where candidate quality comes in, w/r/t tactics, GOTV, etc.  

[ Parent ]
Absolutely
Which is why it is silly to pluck out a seat and just assume a wipeout of everything below it.

[ Parent ]
The only people who would confuse nationalization of elections and nationalization of economies
are wingnuts anyway. :P

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
True, would be sign of 50+ or 60+ but...

but the other option (more reasonable) is doubt about the poll. And you can fight polls like this with other right poll


[ Parent ]
No, Stephen, even if Sutton loses it does NOT mean what you say......
It's a common mistake to assume that these districts and races are linear, that losing Sutton's district means we lose everything more conservative than her district.  It doesn't work that way.

Look at 2006 and 2008, there are always surprises.  Carol Shea-Porter was never supposed to beat Jeb Bradley, even into election day there was no hint of any reporting that Bradley could lose.  Jim Leach lost to a nobody like Dave Loebsack.  Harry Mitchell was a good candidate but nobody expected J.D. Hayworth to lose until a couple weeks out.  And even with these and other surprises, we still won only 30 seats.

We're going to have some surprise losses this November, but some people we thought were goners are going to survive.  And among the tossups, it's tempting to assume they're all goners, but they won't be......we'll have our answers to Jim Gerlach and Chris Shays and others on election night.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Minnesota legislature: State Senator caught dining with Porn Star
Ok a little in the weeds but Republican state senator Paul Koering was recently seen having dinner with a porn star. Koering is a pretty reasonable guy as Republicans go but this along with the fact he is openly gay has got to drive to drive the Fundies in his party nuts.

http://www.startribune.com/lif...

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan


You're late to the party, Mike
There was discussion on the matter yesterday.

As for follow-ups, I think the story from the Brainerd Dispatch does a better job highlighting the electoral ramifications and getting reactions from his opponents: http://www.brainerddispatch.co...

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
Quote from the porn star
"I think he wanted to get in my pants, truthfully. And he was pretty flirty. But it was just dinner. We both were checking out the waiter though. It was fun."
No, I'm sure a 45 year old man went out with a 20 year old porn star for intellectual conversation.  

[ Parent ]
Ketner
Why did Ketner decide not to run again in SC-01?  Especially since it's now an open seat.

If Ketner turns down the draft campaign for Senator, maybe she could run as an indy in SC-01 after all, as that race has Ben Frasier as the Dem nominee.  He's the 1-18 election loser who's also suspected of being a plant.


Ketner better off running in 2012
Ketner, along with the other Dems who passed on the SC-01 seat this year, thought 2012 would be a more favorable year to run. The SC-01 will likely be split if SC picks up a new district as predicted. One of the new districts will likely be anchored in bluing Charleston County (where Linda is from). She'd also have Obama at the top of the ticket to help her out in '12.

If Tim Scott wins the GOP run-off next Tuesday -- as I believe he will -- Linda would be faced with going up against an African-American GOPer in a year that's already forecast to be a rough one for Dems. It wouldn't be a smart move for her or any other Dem, and she knows it.


[ Parent ]
I agree, except Scott is closer to 50-50...
Myrtle Beach is the big undecided right now.  Scott came in first, but 2/3rds voted for someone else. Third place finisher Carroll Campbell III endorsed Thurmond, as did a couple of other also rans.  First place finishers have a bad record winning runoffs too.  

If Thurmond won, maybe Ketner should consider the SC-1 race instead.  


[ Parent ]
IL-SEN: You Got It Wrong, Guys
Here's the 7th Cir opinion.  While Judge Wood's decision agrees that under the law, there probably should've been a special election scheduled for E-Day as well, there was no need for an injunction ordering one because the plaintiffs failed to prove irreparable harm, and this gets booted back to the district court to see if they agree with the 7th Cir that plaintiffs actually succeed on the merits. See pp 39-40:
It is not enough for the plaintiffs to show a likelihood of success on the merits. Critically, they must also show why they will suffer irreparable harm if the preliminary injunction they want does not issue. ...It is there that their case founders. When they decided to abandon their argument that the special election had to occur as soon as practicable, they effectively disclaimed any urgency in the matter that might justify preliminary injunctive relief. Confronted at oral argument, they were unable to suggest any irreparable harm that they were seeking to avoid. In their reply brief, the plaintiffs address harm in a cursory fashion, which really just reiterates their merits argument. We have made clear in the past that "[i]t is not the obligation of this court to research and construct legal arguments open to parties, especially when they are represented by counsel," and we have warned that "perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived." The fact that the plaintiffs leave us essentially in the dark about the irreparable harm that they confront makes it impossible for us to conclude that the district court abused its discretion when it denied the preliminary injunction.

There is still time for the governor to issue a writ of election that will call for an election on the date established by Illinois law and that will make it clear to the voters that they are selecting a replacement for Senator Obama. The district court can easily reach and resolve the merits of this request before any of the harm that the plaintiffs forecast comes to pass. Moreover,  circumstances change: Governor Quinn might issue a writ of election tomorrow, or next week. We detect no irreparable injury that will be avoided through preliminary relief.



According to a GOP poll
Only thing I trust less than a Rasmussan poll is a leaked internal.

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan

[ Parent ]
Don't know about anybody else
But I find that quite encouraging.

[ Parent ]
I'm really getting tired of the political punditocracy breathlessly reporting every internal poll
released by a campaign, without any though as to its veracity.

[ Parent ]
They need some sort of checklist
like,

* district/state/other scope
* election type (primary, general)
* candidate choices and results
* margin of error and sample size
* polling dates
* public or internal poll?
* polling company, and funding source if applicable

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


[ Parent ]
Joe Barton's apology to BP
Barton would become chairman of the Energy Committee if the GOP takes over the House.  Any chance that the Dems can use his apology and the Barton's position in an ad in swing districts?

We should totally do that
the same way they "ran ads against Nancy Pelosi" last cycle.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
Hmm... maybe
I think it depends on how big these Barton comments become.
The sense I'm getting is that they're going to get more play than most of the outrageous things uttered by Congressional Republicans, but by how much I can't predict. From my perspective, it'd be great for people to be aware of his and other controversial comments by Republicans. But, as Glenn suggests, this might not be effective at all.

The best thing would be to let Barton's words speak for themselves*, and if it gets significant coverage, perhaps another GOP "culture of corruption" meme might spring up.

* And of course, this almost certainly won't impact his own re-election; he's in a dark red district, if I'm not mistaken.


[ Parent ]
Lol, I didn't even think about that point
but yeah, you're right, the anti-Pelosi ads didn't do much at all.

But I'd say it wouldn't hurt to drill home this sort of point.  No pun intended.

Who's running against Barton?

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


[ Parent ]
Oops,
Oops, I read your comment the wrong way! Partly I thought it could have been an ironic comment when I first read what you wrote; actually, I think I was letting my pessimistic side question every possible strategy. Sorry about that!

[ Parent ]
Whose in a swing district in the Gulf?
If anyone can use such blabber, it'd be one of them.

[ Parent ]
Unfortunately they are all hard core GOP areas
Gene Taylor and Bobby Bright are the only Dems representing those areas, and neither would probably be helped by these kinds of ads.  

Is Allen Boyd on the Gulf? Maybe some of the Florida districts may be good place to run them.


[ Parent ]
Affirmative
FL-02 is in the Panhandle and is on the Northern Gulf Coast, which is already apparently being affected by the spill.

Male, 23, DC-At Large

[ Parent ]
FL-25 is also on the Gulf,
but its population center is on the other side of FL.  And needless to say, LA-03 is on the gulf.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
We aren't winning LA-03
We don't have a serious candidate there.  

[ Parent ]
Sangisetty
may not be an elected official but you can't ignore his healthy fundraising.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Oh I don't really think we'll win LA-03 or FL-25
Just brainstorming for competitive districts on the Gulf.  Really aren't many.

FL-10 is a swingy district on the Gulf, but Charlie Justice isn't going to put a dent into entrenched Bill Young.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
I don't think he would
In an article I read earlier it mentioned some House GOP rule that would prevent him from taking the top spot again next Congress- whether thats as ranking member or if he could still become chairman- I don't know. Anyone know the rule?  

[ Parent ]
Yep thats it
Just found it in the Politico article:
And Barton's hopes of reversing a Boehner-supported GOP term-limit rule that would force him out the post at the end of this Congress appear more remote than ever now.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/s...



[ Parent ]
Lol
I just went to Politico from your link, and I noticed their "Reforming Wall Street" series.

It's sponsored by Citi.

Thought that was funny. Sorry for being off topic...

NY-14, DC-AL (college) Distraught Mets fan


[ Parent ]
lol
I was watching Ed Schultz the other day and he devoted his whole opening segment to essentially neutering BP and that segment was sponsored by Shell. I got a good chuckle from that.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Ahahaha
Your Christie thing is hilarious. For some reason, whenever I see those groups on Facebook, I chuckle. I'm glad you came up with a political version of it!

It's true though. Whenever I watch the local news here in New York, it seems someone (mostly teachers or union members) is always being interviewed about how much he sucks. He is surely disliked there, no matter what that new NJ poll says.

NY-14, DC-AL (college) Distraught Mets fan


[ Parent ]
Actually
I kind of stole my tagline off of a facebook group. I can not stand Christie, and I live in Indiana so nothing he does really affects me but for some reason he grinds my gears so much.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Really?
i LOVE Chris Christie.  

[ Parent ]
Well
that makes me much more fond of him. JK. But yeah I understand why you guys like him but all the same I despise the man.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I really dislike him as well
It's not that he comes off as an asshole and his ideology is completely out of whack for New Jersey, it's that plus we had no business losing it.  At least we had Corzine's example to save us CT-Sen.

Seeing Cory Booker kick his ass in 2013 is going be GLLLLLOOOORRRIOUS!  And that's what will get him on automatically on VP short-lists.  A poli sci prof made us watch the movie Street Fight which follows his first mayoral campaign (when he lost).  Ive made sure to stay caught up with him and he has quite the record of accomplishment in Newark.  He's going to be on VP lists, can run for Laughtenberg Senate seat if he wants, and I would love to see him run for President.


[ Parent ]
I thought the same thing!
Its been on there for awhile.  

[ Parent ]
The politics of screwing the unemployed and state governments
On June 7, I posted a diary called The politics of rescuing state governments or letting them go to hell

Now that the Republicans in the Senate plus Lieberman and Nelson (NE), with Byrd absent, have in fact screwed the unemployed and strapped state governments facing budgetary emergencies, should we all revise downward our estimates of the vote totals for incumbents throughout the country, generally - which unfortunately means the Democrats, most of whom voted for this rescue package, will get it on the chin just for being members of an ineffectual governing majority?

And may I pause to mention the absurdity of the enraging fact that not a single Republican in the Senate gives a fuck about the poor and unemployed and that a 56-40 vote means a provision has failed in the Senate, nowadays, when every fucking thing is filibustered?

By enabling the most callous, undependable members of the Democratic Caucus in using the deficit as an excuse to screw people during an economic downturn, President Obama has also screwed himself and the chances of all Congressional Democrats in competitive races. There is a time for paying down the debt, and there is a time for deficit spending. It shouldn't take a wild guess to figure out what time it is now, and opinion polls are perfectly clear that people don't like deficits (I hate them, too) but care much more about jobs.

I think the public is going to be handing out a lot of "fuck yous" at the ballot box in November.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


Obama hasn't enabled anybody
There is a stronger argument that the Lamoont primary is the reason Lieberman now acts this way. Besides, they will pass something eventually and in plenty of time to make a dent.

[ Parent ]
Yes he has
He has accepted and spread the argument that we need to rein in spending now. Instead, he should have pushed back hard, forcefully explaining that while the national debt has to be paid down in boom times, now is not the time to even talk about deficits, while people are being thrown out of their houses, laid off, and struggling to pay for food and medical bills.

I hope you're right that they will pass unemployment extension and emergency aid to states, but "eventually" is too late, and what's your evidence that senators will change their votes on this? The senators from Maine were very uncooperative on this.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
No he hasn't
They are talking about extra stimulus for goodness sake. Besides, you are very much mistaken if you think the debt isn't an issue for voters. It will pass (and as I said, in plenty of time to make a dent) because they always change when they get what they want. That means a weaker bill but such is the way the Senate works. And so ends the tit for tat. Moving on.

[ Parent ]
The deficit is an issue
but jobs are a much bigger issue.

And if they can't get unemployment extension through the Senate because senators dare to actually say that unemployed people are lazy and need to have their lifeline cut off for them to look for jobs they've been looking for for months that don't exist, why do you think the votes will be there for extra stimulus?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Final word
I was talking about what the president is doing. I agree jobs are the much bigger issue. But we have to work with the hand that has been dealt.  

[ Parent ]
And I'm saying that the president
and the other Democrats have provided cover for the kind of callous politics Nelson of Nebraska and Lieberman are engaging in, by prematurely emphasizing deficit reduction - especially in the guise of Federal spending cuts - prematurely.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Thanks for the link
Some of the remarks in it are hopeful, but do you understand why I think he should have said now (or a few months ago) is not the time to even TALK about deficits? Obama and Biden are right: It's a matter of timing. But the talk about freezing parts of discretionary spending next year and the insistence on empaneling a deficit commission when Congress voted it down helped strengthen the meme of reducing the deficit, with arguments over whether it should wait until next year or not or whether more line items should be frozen or cut becoming the discussion, rather than fighting for agreement to continue spending more money and not even discuss deficits until a robust, job-laden recovery is well under way. My argument is that the president made a tactical error, and it has helped cause non-right wing Democrats like Steny Hoyer to make remarks like this:

"I think there is spending fatigue," House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said recently. "It's tough in both houses to get votes."

Note what's later in that Washington Post article:

Mixed signals

Senior Democratic congressional aides said those initiatives have not gained traction in part because the White House has not made additional spending on the economy a clear priority.

In recent weeks, for instance, the White House has appeared more intent on cutting spending -- threatening to veto a defense bill over a jet engine project that the Pentagon views as unnecessary and urging every agency to come up with a list of low-priority programs for elimination. Obama has also proposed a three-year freeze in discretionary spending unrelated to national security, an idea endorsed by leaders of both parties at a meeting at the White House last week, according to Obama's letter.

I support the veto threat on the defense bill, but the rest of this passage expresses what I've been arguing is an unforced error by the president.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
AK-Sen: Can Miller be the next Ken Buck ?
Anyone got any idea on the likelyhood that Murkowski might actually be overtaken by 8/24?  Is Miller raising money?  I guess DeMint will stay out of it since she is an incumbent.  Redstate is behind Miller though.


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox