Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 6/14 (Afternoon Edition)

by: Crisitunity

Mon Jun 14, 2010 at 5:37 PM EDT


CT-Sen, CT-Gov: Leftover from last Friday is the most recent Quinnipiac poll of Connecticut. Without much changing from their previous poll other than some within-the-margin-of-error gains for Linda McMahon, the poll is very digestible. Richard Blumenthal leads McMahon 55-35 (instead of 56-31 in late May), leads Rob Simmons (who has "suspended" his campaign) 54-33, and leads Peter Schiff 56-29. McMahon leads Simmons and Schiff in the GOP primary 45-29-13. They also included gubernatorial primaries (but not the general): for the Dems, Ned Lamont leads Dan Malloy 39-22, while for the GOP Tom Foley leads Michael Fedele and Oz Griebel 39-12-2.

IL-Sen: With a growing sense that many Illinois residents would prefer to vote for neither Mark Kirk nor Alexi Giannoulias, a new right-winger with money to burn looks like he's daring to go where Patrick Hughes didn't. Mike Niecestro says he's a "disgusted Republican who has had it with the people the party throws at us," and differentiates himself from Kirk on cap-and-trade and immigration. Just another random teabagger who's all talk and no $$$? No, Niecestro says he already has the 25,000 signatures he needs to qualify before the June 21 deadline, and also has $1 million of his own money ready to go, along with another $100K he's raised elsewhere. Even if he winds up pulling in only a few percent off Kirk's right flank, that could be what that Giannoulias needs to squeak by in what otherwise looks to be a close race.

NV-Sen: Jon Scott Ashjian is turning into something of the white whale for the Nevada GOP. Even though his candidate lost the primary, Dan Burdish, former political director for Sue Lowden, is still filing complaints with the SoS's office to get Ashjian off the ballot. It doesn't look like it'll go anywhere, though; Ashjian himself has qualified for the ballot, easily meeting the low 250-vote signature hurdle even though the "Tea Party" didn't meet the signature requirements for its own ballot line. Of course, competing right-wing third party the Independent American Party is still trying to get Ashjian off the ballot too, and now the teabaggers in general have turned on Ashjian (who never really had much support from them in the first place) since one of their own, Sharron Angle, managed to snare the GOP nod.

NY-Sen, NY-Sen-B (pdf): Siena has yet another poll out of both the Senate races in New York. There's still very little of interest to report. Kirsten Gillibrand leads Bruce Blakeman 48-27, David Malpass 49-24, and Joe DioGuardi 47-29. DioGuardi leads the GOP primary over Blakeman and Malpass, 21-7-3. Chuck Schumer leads Jay Townsend 60-26 and Gary Berntsen 59-27. Townsend leads Berntsen in the other GOP primary, 20-15.

SC-Sen: Vic Rawl, who lost the Democratic nomination to the baffling Alvin Greene last week, is now formally contesting the results of the election. The state party's 92-member executive committee will meet on Thursday to hear evidence, but it's unlikely they'll do anything, as there's no precedent in South Carolina for throwing out a primary election's results.

WA-Sen: The state GOP convention was over the weekend in Washington; unlike, say, Utah or Connecticut, there's nothing at stake here, but the general sense in terms of signage, applause, and the like, was that the party's activist base is pretty jazzed about Sarah Palin-endorsed Clint Didier, and much more tepid about Dino Rossi than they were in 2008, when he was a more apt vehicle for their resentments. A straw poll at a Patriot Coalition event associated with the convention (a subset of a subset of the most hardcore base, so take with much salt) gave Didier a 99-12 edge over Rossi.

AL-Gov: Artur Davis isn't giving up on being a douchebag just because he lost the gubernatorial nomination; he said he isn't sure how Ron Sparks is going to be able to win the uphill fight in the general election, and that Sparks will need something "broader than bingo" to win. Also, this is a very strange time to be making any major staff changes, let alone plunging into what Reid Wilson is describing as "turmoil:" fresh off the triumph of (probably) making the GOP gubernatorial runoff against Bradley Byrne, Robert Bentley just sacked his campaign manager, communications director, and new media director. Bentley is bringing in members of the Mike Huckabee camp to take over (with Huckabee son-in-law Bryan Sanders the new CM), but it seems like his small-time help didn't get demoted, but instead rudely shown the door by the new bosses.

CO-Gov: Businessman Joe Gesundheit Schadenfreude Weltschmerz Gschwendtner has pulled the plug on his Republican gubernatorial bid, without endorsing anybody else. He wasn't able to round up enough signatures to qualify, which is odd, considering that people only need to be able to spell their own names, not his.

FL-Gov: With his once-clear path to the GOP nomination suddenly looking to be on life support, Bill McCollum got some help from a key GOP establishment figure: Mitt Romney. Romney will appear at two Sunshine State fundraisers today, handing out endorsements like candy to a number of other Republicans in better position too.

IA-Gov: You may recall that, in the wake of Terry Branstad's closer-than-expected victory over social conservative Bob vander Plaats, we lamented that the Dems didn't try any Gray Davis-style meddling in the primary to get the more-conservative, less-electable guy over the top. Well, it turns out they did try a little of that; the Dems launched an independent expenditure committee called "Iowans for Responsible Government" that ran ads on Fox News and sent direct mail attacking Branstad for tax hikes and putting his face on a liberal Mt. Rushmore next to Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Nancy Pelosi. While it didn't seal the deal, it may have contributed to the underwhelming showing by Branstad.

MI-Gov: AG Mike Cox won the endorsement of Michigan Right to Life, a big endorsement that will help him as he fights for the social conservative vote in the GOP primary with Rep. Peter Hoekstra. Cox might be the Republican we most want to face out of the GOP field; Rasmussen joined the crowd today in finding that he polls the weakest against either Democrat.

NY-Gov (pdf): Siena also polled the gubernatorial race; again, nothing noteworthy here, other than Andrew Cuomo having lost a few points since last time. Cuomo leads Rick Lazio 60-24, and leads Carl Paladino 65-23. Party-endorsed Lazio leads Paladino (assuming he can successfully petition onto the ballot) in the GOP primary, 45-18. Meanwhile, the race may get slightly more interesting as gadflyish New York city councilor Charles Barron seems to be moving forward on his quixotic plans to create a whole third party (New York Freedom Democratic Party) for a challenge to the left, mostly to protest Cuomo putting together an all-white ticket.

OH-Gov: Incumbent Dem Ted Strickland won the NRA endorsement today, instead of GOP ex-Rep. John Kasich. That may seem a surprise, but Strickland has a lifetime "A" rating from the NRA while Kasich was always an unusually anti-gun Republican.

GA-12: The Hill details how Rep. John Barrow's fundraising from fellow Dems has fallen way off this year, perhaps an indication of blowback over his "no" vote on HCR. He's only gotten money directly from five Democratic colleagues and five others' PACs, compared with 53 in 2006 and 22 in 2008. (An alternative explanation, of course, is that he's in no major trouble in the general election this year and that money may be more needed elsewhere.) Barrow still has the AFL-CIO's endorsement, and about a 20:1 CoH advantage over primary challenger Regina Thomas. Speaking of one of his minor GOP opponents, Carl Smith, the fire chief of the small town of Thunderbolt, has a less-appealing resume now that he just got canned by his city council, which opted to stop paying for a fire department and return to an all-volunteer operation.

IN-03: The Indiana state GOP met over the weekend to pick a nominee to fill the spot left behind by the resigned Rep. Mark Souder. It wasn't much of a surprise: they picked state Sen. Marlin Stutzman, an up-and-comer who gave Dan Coats a challenge in the GOP Senate primary. Stutzman won on the second ballot, with state Rep. Randy Borror a distant second. It was a double pick: Stutzman will be replace Souder as the GOP candidate in the general election, and also will be the GOP's candidate in the special election that will also be held on Election Day in November (which, assuming he wins, will allow him to serve in the post-election lame duck session).

NC-02: Rep. Bob Etheridge, usually one of the more low-key members of the House, had an embarrassing flip-out in front of two GOP trackers/college students asking him if he "supported the Obama agenda," grabbing one of them and his camera. Etheridge subsequently issued a statement apologizing.

Polltopia: PPP is soliciting opinions on where the poll next, both multiple-choice and open-ended. Let 'em know what burning questions you'd like answered.

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 6/14 (Afternoon Edition)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

PPP
Can't decide between WA, PA and WI.

Voted WA
Probably gonna change when the poll shows up. Not sure if I want PA, WA, WI, or NM. He said they might do the top two. Also kinda interested in OR.  

[ Parent ]
Let's just say that Didier
with some money could make it interesting.  Whether he gets that money is the million dollar question.  Rossi isn't as revered by Washington Republicans as Thompson and Pataki are with Wisconsin and New York Republicans.

I suppose the odd primary system in Washington could benefit Didier.


lol
I'm pretty sure that's the first time "George Pataki" and "revered" have appeared in the same sentence.

20, Ind, PA-14

[ Parent ]
Bachmann- Senate?
Maybe she's getting ready if her CD goes away after redistricting; she has her choice: '12 or '14. http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo...
Or maybe it was just a typo. Who knows with her.

No way Bachmann beats Klobuchar
Franken though...I could possibly see happening since '14 is likely to be a republican year, or at best a neutral year.  '12 will probably be democratic in nature plus Klobuchar's pretty much unassailable.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13

[ Parent ]
No way Bachmann can beat Franken or anyone else......
If Norm Coleman as an incumbent couldn't beat Franken, then Bachmann as a challenger will get blown out.

Bachmann is much worse a nominee than Sharron Angle now in NV-Sen, because Bachmann already is on TV all the time and too well-known to even try to pretend later she's anything but batshit crazy.  I don't think Angle will beat Reid in a strong GOP year, and I certainly don't think Bachmann can win under virtually any circumstances.

Only if Franken is damaged goods from personal or official scandal can he lose to someone like Bachmann.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Republicans will get their sixth year itch in the second year
Parties almost never get two big midterm years in the same Presidency.  

[ Parent ]
Yeah, Bachmann shouldn't bother
I know it's practically worthless crafting likely voter models 2-4 years out, but you know me, I can't help myself.

Dem - 40%
GOP - 33%
Independent - 27%

(that is, presuming Dem registration holds steady in the coming years, while some liberal/moderate GOP-ers bolt to the non-affiliated column.)

Bachmann - 3/80/33 = 36%
Klobcuhar - 97/20/67 = 64%

Bachmann - 10/87/43 = 45%
Franken - 90/13/57 = 55%

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


[ Parent ]
Term Limits
From Stateline.org: Term limits will create rookie league in some legislatures

http://www.stateline.org/live/...

Highlights from the article:
The longest serving member or Dean of the (state) Senate in Michigan will be age 39

76% of the Michigan State Senators will be replaced, not counting election losses.

34 of the 110 members of the House of Representatives are term-limited, too.

Come January, Michigan will have a new Senate majority leader and a new House speaker to go along with a new governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general and secretary of state.

In Nevada term limits are kicking in for the first time, with one-third of the Senate and one-quarter of the Assembly, including Speaker Barbara Buckley, barred from reelection.

Nationally, 378 legislators in 14 states are term-limited this year, according to an analysis by the National Conference of State Legislatures. The list includes 194 Republicans, 180 Democrats and four from other (or no) parties. It is heavy on legislative leadership.

House speakers are term-limited in 10 states: Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Maine, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, Oklahoma and South Dakota. Senate leaders, such as presidents or majority leaders, are term-limited in another 10: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma and South Dakota. Many of these leaders' replacements, meanwhile, will be working with newcomers in the executive branch: Of the 37 governor's seats being contested this year, 24 are open. There is a very good chance that a majority of the governors in 2011 will be just starting out in the job.


And this is why legislative term limits are a bad idea, at least at the state level. n/t


[ Parent ]
While I understand the need for some experience
I like the idea of more regular turnover.

Just the fact of turnover is not itself a "bad idea".


[ Parent ]
Just remember
the permanent shadow government of lobbyists has no term limits. Draw the appropriate conclusions about what happens when institutional memory is subtracted and there are many more lame-duck officials who don't have to answer to elections.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Less time to buy elected officials
can also be a good thing. I'm only disagreeing with you in part -- I'm just pointing to the flip side of the equation.

[ Parent ]
Understood
But also less time to build up institutional knowledge and memory, which can encourage much more reliance on biased lobbyist narratives and position papers.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
IA-Gov
I think you mean Branstad's underwhelming performance?  

Reply NC-02
I think it is stupid that this is now standard practice. Members of Congress have enough on there plates without having a bunch of hacks following them around with cameras. It is really stupid and is only going to get worse. I don't blame Etheridge, I would love to let that kid know what I thought too but all the same he should have known better. The kid got what he wanted I'm sure. I bet he just loves getting his five minuets of fame, wanna bet he's on fox tonight? Seriously he will, mark my words, probably Hannity maybe Glenn or Bill O. I hate the gottcha tactics and they are a problem on both sides.  Enough is enough.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

True,
but on the other hand, try telling that to Jim Webb. It's not always a bad thing when the incumbent embarrasses himself in front of a tracker. The difference is that SR Sidarth behaved himself. These kids obviously did not.  

[ Parent ]
I disagree
I just watched that video. It was awful. You're defending a congressman for reacting violently to a sharp question? What I'd like to know is whether this is likely to lose him an election in what I think I remember is an R+2 district. I wouldn't vote for a Republican against him on the basis of this one incident, but I sure think acts of violence and violent intolerance toward questions in a public place are fair criteria for voting against a politician. He said "Who are you?" I'd reply by asking "Who is he?" He is a Congressman, a public official representing the people, and while he does not have to reply to a question he considers impertinent, he has no right to react violently. That's a crime.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
You
make some valid points, and public officials should be held at a higher standard. All the same it annoys me that these people walk around with cameras egging members of Congress on hoping for something like this to happen. I never really defended the Congressman, I stated his reaction was bad and he should have known better.    

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
MI-Gov
I do think Cox is the weakest Repulbican but Hoekstra wasn't doing much better.  Against Bernero, Hoekstra actually polled worse than Cox.  

While the Repulbican candidates still lead, it's good news that the Democratic candidates are as close as they are to the 2 mostly likely Repulbican nominees.  The Democrats are more unknown and haven't really started campaigning much.  The Republican candidates, however, have already spent several million dollars advertising and have had a more active campaign.  The Democratic race should be getting more active soon so it will be interesting to see how their increased name recognition effects polling.  

Snyder polled the best for Republicans but I would be surprised if he's able to win the primary.  I think he would have big problems in the general (outsourcing) so he may not be as strong as the polling indicates.  


As usual, I don't trust Rasmussen......
Rasmussen lines up with other pollsters about half the time, and produces outliers about half the time.  And where only Rasmussen is polling, we don't know what we're getting unless the numbers are truly ridiculous.

In MI-Gov, it's entirely possible that Rasmussen is simply erratic and actually showing the Dems running closer than a credible poll would show.  That's a rarity for Rasmussen to err in our direction, but the problems with their methodology are such that it's occasionally bound to happen.  Or Rasmussen could be right this time.  Problem is, we don't really know if someone else credible doesn't poll around the same time.  Steve Mitchell is the best Michigan pollster, and I haven't seen anything from his outfit in MI-Gov since last year when John Cherry was still running.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
I'll wait for PPP, thank you very much.


Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Do those numbers
Seem contradictory or is it just me? 51-31 isn't exactly strong for an incumbent but I see no way Melancon can win.

[ Parent ]
What's contradictory?
+20 seems pretty strong for an incumbent in my opinion.

I've never bought into the whole narrative about incumbents needing to be at 50% to be safe.  Is 48-25 really worse than 53-37?

Melancon has some room to grow I suppose as he's only winning 60% of blacks but there's no path without white voters.

A plurality of Democrats in Louisiana disapprove of Obama on the oil spill.  That makes it close to impossible for Melancon to do anything but get blown out.  I'd start denouncing Obama if I were Melancon (do a hyper version of the Critz campaign) and hope black people vote for me anyway.


[ Parent ]
They will
They sure as hell ain't voting for Vitter. He has to hope that the LA-02 race turns out blacks in New Orleans. The fact that every LA Republican congressman is running almost unopposed and the DCCC looks like it is surrendering LA-03 is not good for him. If everyone is running unopposed, he will have to build up a HUGE margin in LA-02 and 3. If Cassidy and Alexander are unopposed, thats bad for him because that gives the blacks in those districts no reason to turn out.
Also, look at Vitter with Dems. He's only down 10 to Melancon.  

[ Parent ]
The 50% rule is garbage
And has been since the mid 1990's.  As long as the incumbent leads, even if its only by 48%-39%, they almost always win.  Most of the time nowadays, the undecideds usually split 50/50 or by the margin of the final vote.  

[ Parent ]
I see you've registered today
I ask you to back up your assertions with some facts and data.


[ Parent ]
I can show you several instances
One case was the Indiana Governor's Race in 2008, where Mitch Daniels led for the first half of the year and through the summer with 50% of the vote or less and ended up winning by 59%-39%.  

Then there is Mitch McConnell who never broke 50% in the polls against Bruce Lunsford, but in the end, won by a solid six points.  

The 50% rule is a long discredited rule that worked back in the 1980's and before, when polling was done less frequently and the partisan environment was less polarized.


[ Parent ]
Nate suggests otherwise
"almost always win" is a stretch. http://www.fivethirtyeight.com...

However, the incumbent's vote share in early polls may in fact be a better predictor of the final margin in the race than the opponent's vote share. That is, it may be proper to focus more on the incumbent's number than the opponent's when evaluating such a poll -- even though it is extremely improper to assume that the incumbent will not pick up any additional percentage of the vote.

And it's still only June.

Exceptions are just that.


[ Parent ]
Bad Example
Jill Long Thompson is a disaster of a politician. She did not campaign at all and she blew this race. When Daniels polled bad his approval was also in the gutter and JLT was a generic D. He got his approval up and no one, including me, thought JLT was up for the job.  So he won in a landslide. JLT can not even get a decent haircut, if she was running Indiana right now I promise she would have approvals in the thirties. I only supported her because it was a redistricting year and I did not want Daniels drawing out Hill's district. I am definitely not a Daniels supporter but if JLT was running the state like she ran her campaign we would be fucked. Had we selected the architect from Indy we would have won or at least come close to have won. I really wish Baron Hill would have run, but I do not blame him on passing.

Also Bruce Lunsford was not a great campaigner and he only lost because of his past shady business ventures. Had we selected Greg Fischer I think we would have won by a narrow margin. Or if Critz Lucelleden (SP) or Ben Chandler had taken the plunge without  a doubt we would have won.


Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  


[ Parent ]
If Long Thompson was such an awful politician
How did she win and hold one of the most Republican districts in the country(IN-03) for three terms?

[ Parent ]
Not the same as the current IN-03
Back when JLT ran for the 3rd, it was a South Bend-based tossup-ish district looking pretty much like the current 2nd.  That said, looking from outside Indiana, she didn't seem to be a horrible rep.

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
I don't think she was
I wasn't into politics then, so my judgment here isn't the best. Everyone says she is b/c she blew her lead and lost in a landslide. What they neglect to realize is Daniels was very unpopular for awhile b/c of some proposals he had made. After they went into effect, people liked them, and his popularity surged. It had nothing to do with her being a bad politician.  

[ Parent ]
I
never denied Daniels personal popularity and mention it a lot. However that does not mean her campaign was not bad. It was horrible, really, really bad. Trust me she is a very bad politician and while Daniels popularity contributed to the blowout I can promise you Hill or the architect would have been at least within five points of him. Running a decent campaign matters, do not forget Obama won Indiana she should have gotten some coattails.      

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
The
district was not one of the most conservative in the country by any means, a tossup district would best describe it, and her initial election was even sort of a fluke at that. If memory serves me correctly the Republicans nominated an aide to a Mayor who at the time was very unpopular do to some sort of tax proposal that was hated by everyone. She had a lot of name ID do to her previous run in the district and her Senate run and she was able to win re-election do to being an incumbent, nothing overly special. Trust me, while she is a nice woman she ran a horrible campaign. This is not her first time either. I talked to a guy who worked on her 2002 congressional run and he described her as worse than Katherine Harris or something like that. Said she was a disaster. Trust me she ran a horrible campaign.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I'll get the newbie's back on this one......
I wish I remembered who the source was, but I read something a few months ago linked to Pollster.com that reported on a study showing the 50% rule is, indeed, bunk.  I suppose if you do a search on Mark Blumenthal's site, you could find it, but I don't have the motivation at the moment to search for it.

But I remember reading the report on Pollster and nodding my head in agreement, as it confirms my own intuition.  Really, when an incumbent is in the high 40s and up by double-digits, that's not a meaningful difference from the low 50s.  As an election gets close, an incumbent failing to break 50 is a real concern, and for a House race (they always break late) I'd call it significant come a month out or so.  But as long as an incumbent is up something like 47-27, it's a bad bet to pick the guy at 27 to win.  A few of them do, but they are the exceptions, not the incumbent sitting in the high 40s.

I do think it's different for U.S. Senate races, where people are more familiar with the incumbent and there are fewer people who've given it no thought at all.  But even then, pretending the 50% rule is predictive of a 50-50 race or close to it this far out is speculative.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
So are you refuting Nate?
who countered the pollster.com data....

(it is a legit debate, but this far out, Nate's data suggests that the incumbent's poll numbers more frequently reflects the final result. Nate acknowledges exceptions)


[ Parent ]
I haven't read Nate's piece, but his analysis is often imperfect, such as...
...his pollster ratings, which Mark Blumenthal at Pollster.com finds problematic in his latest commentary.

Nate is great, truly a superior number-cruncher, and a breath of fresh air among partisan bloggers in refusing as a rule to drink Kool-Aid or claim the sky is falling.  But I think sometimes he gets into a little bit of a statistician's tunnel vision, the same tunnel vision pollsters themselves sometimes have.

My own observation and experience is that once you get past incumbents for Governor or U.S. Senate, or of course President, the 50% rule just doesn't mean that much.  Congressional races and all other stuff downballot have high undecideds until after Labor Day, and often until October.  And I just don't see incumbents in the high 40s and up by double-digits actually losing very much.  Now, if they're up, say, 47-45, then it's a different story.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
By definition, personal observations are not complete
so unless one does the work to collect all --available-- data from relevant polls/elections, that is likely to lead to bias in one direction or another.  

[ Parent ]
The 40 percent minus deadzone...
I am not a huge fan of the 50 percent rule universally.  What I think is more accurate is the 40 percent or less deadzone for incumbents.  There seems to be strong evidence supporting that assertion.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

[ Parent ]
SC-Sen Alvin Greene, obscenity?
From the info so far, IMO he seems like a plant (probably not by someone directly with the GOP, but maybe by some SC conservative trickster to embarrass Dems, and as a free bonus help DeMint, as if he really needed any).

But this TPM article: Expert: Obscenity Charge Brought Against Alvin Greene Extremely Rare is making me wonder about his obscenity charge. At a minimum it seems an extreme prosecution by that SC DA.
If TPM is accurate, Greene's felony obscenity "crime" seems ludicrously overblown. That incident should be at best maybe a civil suit of sexual harassment by that woman (and in the real world she should've maybe just given him the finger and walked away).  


Here's a thought
I'm not saying that this is the reason, but might it have been brought because you had a black man and a white woman here?

[ Parent ]
My ideas for midterm campaign strategy
I wrote a long dkos diary about my ideas for campaign strategy for Democrats in the midterms.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

Thanks for the link
I read it and commented there (my DailyKos username is MichaelNY).

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
SC Democratic Party has no precedent, look to Tennessee
The SC Democratic Party needs to look at what the Tennessee Democratic Executive Committee did in a 2008 State Senate primary between incumbent Rosalind Kurita and Tim Barnes. Kurita won a close primary over Barnes after she cast the critical vote to give Republican Ron Ramsey the Senate Speakership/Lt. Governorship over LG John Wilder. The TN Democratic Executive Committee over-turned the results over reported irregularities and fears of Republican cross-over votes, as the Rs gave her a pass in the general as a reward for her vote and no big R primaries were on the ballot. Barnes went on to win the general election despite a write-in campaign and a lawsuit challenging the ruling by Kurita.

Democrat: TN-8

No thats the last thing they should do.
The situation you described is the kind of electoral nonsense you expect in Hugo Chavez's Venezuela not the United States of America. Its kind of shocking that they could do something like that in TN.


Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
Chavez?
OK, I'm not going to get into an off-topic debate about which country had fairer, more accurate elections in the first decade of the 21st century, Venezuela or the U.S. But I will agree with you that throwing out the results of a primary election, without proof of major irregularities, would be abhorrent and a horrendous precedent.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
PPP
will poll Georgia, Maine, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington, or Wisconsin this weekend.

So get over there and vote for one.  

28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26


I chose Pennsylvania this time.


My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
I don't
want to see NM-GOV polled that much ... but just the thought of ANY House races being polled (NM-02 in particular) will probably make me choose that one.

I may choose Georgia though.

28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26


[ Parent ]
I went with
Texas. I really want to see if Rick Perry will lose to Bill White. I also want to see Kay Bailey's approval numbers after getting killed in the Republican primary.  

TX-13,22,Dem

[ Parent ]
Yeah
Martinez probably still has a primary bounce. Wait a month or so to see how the race is shaping.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I
am tempted to chose Maine just to show that Scotty is full of it. I will probably pick Ohio Pennsylvania or Wisconsin though. I am leaning towards Ohio but I like to see how the results are tilting before I cast my ballot.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
TX, PA, WI all look like good choices
Maine and New Mexico are useless as they just had their primaries.  NM is especially useless given the Gov race where one primary was contested and the other not.

PA is a mature race now.  TX is mature now too, even more so than PA, very interesting mathcup there.


[ Parent ]
If CrossTarget is showing Brown up 3
on Whitman, then he's probably up a good 8-10 points in reality.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/p...

Brown seems to have the one thing politicians value: the ability to make gaffes and be forgiven for them.  Californians will probably take whatever gaffe from Brown as "Jerry being Jerry."

This race would be very different if the LA mayor or Newsome were Whitman's opponents.


NY-Gov
Charles Barron is an obnoxious provocateur who's biggest hobby is race-baiting. And this is coming from someone who dislikes both Cuomo (he's fucking over the WFP for no other apparent reason than because he can) and NYC Council Speaker Christine Quinn (who he talked about trying to unseat last year). Barron is basically the kind of person that the Right imagines Al Sharpton or Jessee Jackson to be.

And calling it the "New York Freedom Democratic Party" is particularly despicable for its comparison of the modern New York Democratic Party, where we have an all-white slate for no other reason than that no minority candidate wanted to run, and where we have a black governor and a black state senate leader, with the Mississippi Democratic Party of the 1960's, where segregation was institutionalized.

(see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...


No disagreement on Barron
But what about the strong accusations of corruption in the Working Families Party? This guy is Attorney General. Do you suppose he has legal reasons to want to stick a fork in that party?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
SC-Gov: Stick a (another) fork in Barrett
http://politicalticker.blogs.c...
McMaster will endorse Haley tomorrow. The only way Barrett could have made it would be to pick up all of McMaster and Bauer's supporters, and since that was never gonna happen, and will definitely not happen now, he's screwed. If he was smart he'd pack up and prepare to primary Graham in 2014.  

Completely agreed
I don't support Haley in the general election, but there's something delicious about seeing all the racists in the South Carolina Republican Party go all apoplectic because, God forbid, a woman of color can beat them. Kudos to the Republican voters in that state for not being racist against Indian-Americans, too. You'd think people wouldn't deserve effusive praise merely for being (at least relatively) non-racist, but the Republican primary voters have clearly shown they are a lot less racist than some of the highly visible politicians in their state.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
eMeg
has a violent streak?

In June 2007, an eBay employee claimed that Ms. Whitman became angry and forcefully pushed her in an executive conference room at eBay's headquarters, according to multiple former eBay employees with knowledge of the incident. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the matter was delicate and was deemed to be strictly confidential.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06...

No Meg, if you ever manage to buy your way into the governor's seat you cannot physically shove Steinberg or Perez out of your office during budget negotiations and you can't fire them either.  

19, Male, Independent, CA-12


Based on that article
it was a single incident, and apparently out of character. I don't think she should be disqualified on that basis.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
New poll looks bad for Childers in MS-01
Nunnelee leads Childers 50%-42% according to a GOP poll, which is down from a 51%-42% Childers lead in March.   http://hotlineoncall.nationalj...

I know its a GOP poll, but looking at polling from OH-01, IL-11, NM-02, NV-03, MI-07, OH-16 and now MS-01, it wouldnt surprise me if most of the Democratic freshman class of 2008 is wiped out.  Im just waiting to see polling that puts Mary Jo Kilroy and Suzanne Kosmas down 15 points.  


Not sure about Kosmas
But I would expect Kilroy to be down by 15. She faces a popular, well-known challenger, and barely won in 2008, a Dem year.  

[ Parent ]
Maybe, but she should be able to use the advantages of incumbency
like most other representitives have done.  Christ, why are these Democrats such awful politicians?

[ Parent ]
In other news,
NJ-07 - October 14, 2008 - Linda Stender up big on Leonard Lance in internal poll with just two weeks to go before the election.

http://dccc.org/blog/archives/...

That gal's gonna make one hell of a fine Congresswoman!

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
Well
I guess that hurts everyone's argument that Dem internal polls are more reliable.  

[ Parent ]
In general they are
But much of that has to do with the fact that the majority of GOP internals are done by POS who are worse than the name suggests.

[ Parent ]
The Democratic freshman class of 2008 is 34 people
Childers might get defeated, unfortunately, because that part of the south is turning against Democrats fast. The other House seats you listed are not in the south and some even have D PVI's, and I expect all 6 of them to get reelected. You can ask Artur Davis about how accurate recent polling has been.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
50-42 in a GOP right after their primary
means Childers is almost certainly leading, or at least tied.

[ Parent ]
It really means very little either way.
WTF is with a poll that has 92% of the district's residents decided on a House race six months in advance, DOWN from 93% who were decided in March?  Makes no sense.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
Wiped out?
Not a chance! You seriously think ALL of them could lose? The chances against that are astronomical, even if there's a Republican landslide!

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Not discussed in this digest, but I think FL-Sen is fast moving toward Crist......
Crist is setting himself up as the luckiest candidate in America.  I was part of the giant bipartisan crew of head-shakers who figured Crist as an indy would be quixotic, that he would tank and embarrass himself.

Instead, he gets closer to a November victory every freakin' week!

Jeff Greene really is Crist's savior against Meek.  Meek either will go broke winning the primary with no time or ability to raise money fast for November, or Greene will win the primary and send all the Democrats Charlie needs permanently into Charlie's arms.

Meanwhile, Rubio comes out still favoring offshore drilling, which wasn't a bad calculation even in May when public opinion still showed majority support despite a significant decline.  But public opinion has NOT stopped moving, and Rubio's position juxtaposed against Crist demanding a public referendum on banning it off Florida's coastline is shaping up as a big advantage for Crist.  As much as this oil spill has hamstrung Obama and threatened Team Blue in the midterms as a result, the fact is it's only helped Crist.

They say "luck" is where preparation meets opportunity.  Well Crist sure prepared, and Jeff Greene, Rubio's hard right conservatism, and the oil spill are providing Crist will all the opportunity he needs.

I'm almost openly rooting for Crist in November now, and I hope his next fundraising report shows decent progress in money raised and cash-on-hand.  If he's got the cash he needs for TV in the late summer and fall, then he's going to be in the driver's seat.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


Rubio
Atleast when he has a position, he keeps it when its unpopular or when he may lose votes b/c of it, not always changing it just to win like a certain orange man...

[ Parent ]
From your keyboard to Rubio's concession speech writer's ears......
I guess you and your guy will take some solace in standing "on principle" when he goes down in November.

It really will be a great embarrassment for Republicans for Rubio to lose and Crist to win as a Dem-caucusing indy after the Republicans recruited Crist.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
LMAO that you think Crist will caucus with the Dems
Crist will be a GOP Lieberman. In my opinion after the election he will pivot back right and caucus with the GOP. Like Lieberman agrees with the Dems on most small issues (and makes a big deal about being a pain on key big ones) I think Crist will be the same for the GOP.


Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
Not just my opinion, that's pretty much what everyone thinks......
Every pundit I've read suggests that Crist will caucus with the Democrats if he wins.  Crist won't say that, but he's obviously pivoting to supplant Meek as the de facto Democrat on the ballot.

And the Lieberman analogy is a poor one, it doesn't apply.  Lieberman was a sitting Democratic Senator with strong personal relationships with his colleagues, and that made it easy for them to take him back as a prodigal son after he beat Lamont.  Remember, too, that the Democratic establishment never wavered from backing him over Lamont in the primary.  On top of that, the Democratic Party is a bigger tent than the Repubilcans, and indeed the Republican tent is only shrinking.

In contrast, Crist has no friends among Senate Republicans and was abandoned in the Republican primary before he flipped to indy.  If Crist wins, he will have humiliated the Republican establishment itself, which Lieberman never did since they were on his side.  There is no existing goodwill to get him or keep him in Senate Republicans' good graces, nor do Republicans tolerate the amount of dissension Crist has shown on policy.

Honestly it would be very smart for Senate Republicans to recruit and welcome Crist into their caucus if he wins, but it's very doubtful they'll do it.  And even if they do, Crist's ties to them are much weaker than Lieberman's to the Democratic establishment.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
I'd respect him for sticking to principle
except for the fact that I respect it more when politicians see a fucking calamity and reconsider in light of it. Excuse my language, and of course you know I mean no disrespect toward you.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Shutting down offshore drilling would be another calamity
In LA. It makes up 16% of our economy. By shutting down drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, you destroy 16% of our economy. That is why every politician, Democrats and Republicans, in Louisiana have come out and said to keep drilling, from Mary Landrieu and Charlie Melancon to David Vitter and Bobby Jindal. Florida is not as dependent on it because they have so much tourism, but in LA, MS, TX, and AL it is a major source for jobs. In South LA, oil drilling probably makes up over half of the jobs.  

[ Parent ]
As you mention
He is running for the Senate from Florida, which is not dependent on offshore drilling and where offshore drilling is unpopular.

I feel a lot of compassion toward Louisiana being between a rock and a hard place. Because the oil eruption has destroyed or will destroy the rest of your state's economy, you all are even more dependent on the industry that destroyed it.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Is it really that unpopular in FL?
I know its loosing popularity, but I remember it still being more popular than unpopular/  

[ Parent ]
The latest poll showed
a majority opposed. It's subject to further confirmation, of course, but the trend lines have been down.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Quinnipiac's recent poll showed a complete flip-flop by the electorate......
They went from something like 61-33 in favor of offshore drilling in the preceding poll a couple months earlier, to 51-42 opposed a couple weeks ago.

And this is before they've really been hit big with oil on their beaches.  Chuck Todd, IMO the smartest political analyst in the media, was asked when he thought the oil spill would be a troublesome voting issue for Obama, and Todd replied, "when there's oil on South Beach."  I think that was very smart, and I think oil on South Beach also is when Rubio has to flip-flop or face certain November defeat.  And I don't think he'll completely flip-flop on this one, although he showed in his response to the Arizona immigration law he's more than happy to flip-flop when the hard right electorate so demands.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Which is why I'm skeptical of the poll boosting Jindal
and his approval ratings, after he asked President Obama to allow continued offshore drilling.

But then again, until there is actual data showing the political harm of offshore drilling, all I can say is "wait and see".


[ Parent ]
I believe the Jindal poll for 2 reasons......
First, it's Louisiana.  It's a right-wing state, very different from Florida.  Ideologically, they're friendlier to oil, less concerned about the environment.  And more importantly, Louisiana's economy already depends on offshore drilling, Florida's does not.

Second, Jindal has played the game well in-state, looking hands-on.  So he's doing a nice job nursing his own public image.  He's good at that on a state level.  I don't know if it will ever translate well to a national campaign.  I'm always suspicious that these Republicans from very conservative states won't ever learn to appeal to a very different national electorate.  But that's going off on a tangent.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
If Jindal is getting a boost
then Rubio should be able to stick with his position without getting hurt.

I suspect (don't know) that those in the Cuban community who like Rubio will stick with him. In that case, oil on South Beach won't affect Rubio. It's not like many Ds in South Beach were planning to vote for Marco.

(I'm guessing that oil that makes it around the FL straight won't have nearly as bad an effect as it's having on gulf coast beaches.)


[ Parent ]
I don't see how you come to that conclusion at all......
I just explained why it's different.  What's your basis for thinking it's not?  Louisiana depends on oil, Florida doesn't.

And the polling shows Florida souring on offshore drilling now, BEFORE the oil has hit.

So there's no way this doesn't hurt Rubio.  Does it hurt him with Republicans?  No, probably not.  But it hurst him with independents.

Remember that the FL-Sen race has become, with some stability, Crist fighting Meek evenly for Dems, Crist fighting Rubio evenly for independents, and Republicans splitting in favor of Rubio but with a large minority still for Crist.

Rubio's posturing on offshore drilling and on BP means he likely bleeds some with indies, and possibly suffers even some minimal bleeding with Republicans.  He certainly gains nothing at all.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
LA is Red, FL is half Red
If Jindal is getting a boost from being in a red state, Rubio should break even from being in a purple state.

I realize that's a gross generalization.  


[ Parent ]
Did you see the whole PPP poll?
Everyone in LA wants offshore drilling. A majority of liberals, moderates, conservatives, Democrats, Republicans, and Independents favor it. If we lose offshore drilling, our economy sinks. If we did not have offshore drilling, we would be worse off the California.  

[ Parent ]
In celebration
I think I'm going to change my user name to Crist Unity!

[ Parent ]
Just wondering
where did the name Crisitunity come from anyway?

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
For the longest time
I kept misreading the moniker as having something to do with Christ or Christianity.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Hmmm
I'll let Cris answer for himself, but I know Crisitunity was qa word used on The Simpsons.  Lisa explains to Homer that the CHinese have a word where it means crisis and opportunity, and Homer goes "that's right, crisitunity".  

Or something like that.


[ Parent ]
Oh, I see
always thought it had something to do with unity, lol.

(wonder what that Chinese word is anyhow...would be nice to know since I'm in China now...)

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
I don't know about Greene.
I think Meek needs a primary because obviously he needs something to get his name and message out there.  Meek actually having to run might help.

[ Parent ]
I
think Meek has very little chance in November and the best thing that can happen for us is Greene winning the primary so most all of the Democratic support will go over to Crist. I can't see Meek winning this and a Crist win is better than a Rubio one and I think Crist will caucus with us.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Alvin Greene Can't name opponent
http://www.realclearpolitics.c...
Just go to the end. He struggled to name Jim Demint as his opponent. Ya'll better hope Rawl succeeds in his protest.  

Actually, that would be a funny dig at DeMint if deliberate......
It would be great if Greene just spends the rest of the campaign referring to DeMint at "what's his name."  That alone would make him a worthy nominee!

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10

[ Parent ]
Keep in mind that the same Quinnipiac poll found
Obama's approval/disapproval in Florida at 40/54.

Rubio's problem is that he cannot seem to win enough of the Obama disapprovers.  It doesn't look like he'll be able to do because Crist will act conservative enough to keep Rubio from consolidating the anti-Obama vote.

Crist may just be one of the best politicians in the country.

How much would you bet that he'd take a spot on the 2012 Republican ticket if asked even after caucusing with the Democrats?


[ Parent ]
I
would bet exactly nothing at all on that one. Crist is hated among Republicans and if he was selected by the R nominee I'll eat my own leg. If he wants to survive in the Senate he needs to be liberal and run as a Democrat next time or we need to not front a candidate against him and he would be the de-facto nominee.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Not a liberal
He doesn't have to be a total liberal, just close to the mainstream of the Democratic Party on major issues.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
True
but he will have to fend off a Democratic primary challenge which should be easy if the field is cleared for him and he does good with D's now.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Why?
If he stays on his current route and continues to act as a centrist, he'll draw a large number from the center-left, center, and center-right.

I'd venture to say there are more Florida voters who fall into those categories than a far left liberal stance. Crist has the best of both worlds, no reason for him to alienate part of his base for a smaller part.

Florida is certainly not a liberal state. Ask Kendrick Meek how being "the liberal candidate" works out.


[ Parent ]
You speak the truth
He's drawing more from the center-left than center-right right now. It seems to me, he's best off being the center-left candidate, not a really liberal one.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Republicans
in general hate him and I find it unlikely that they would give him the Vice Presidency when they consider him a traitor. Let's say Obama had not won in 2008 and we had a brand new nominee in 2012, do you think it likely they would offer Joe Lieberman the number 2 spot? I think not and Republicans are not about to give Crist VP either. It will not happen. Also Kendrick Meek is not the liberal candidate, he is the unknown candidate and I am supporting Crist because of it.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I'd bet a million dollars
which I don't have, that Crist would not be asked to join a Republican ticket after leaving the party, even if he were to lose this election and thereby not caucus with the Democrats. Not a freakin chance in the world!

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Yup, Crist is permanently toast as a Republican......UNLESS...
...the Senate Republican Caucus gives the middle finger to the rank-and-file and recruits him into their caucus even after he beats Rubio.

But Senate Republicans won't do that.

Absent that, Crist's Republican days are OVER.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Congressman with Daughter or Son a Statewide Elected Official
Is there any current instance of a Congressman where their daughter or son is a statewide elected official?  I can't think of one.  I can think of two that the situation can happen to them after the November election.  South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson with his son being elected Attorney General of South Carolina and Texas Congressman Ron Paul with his son being elected United States Senator from Kentucky.  

Most recently
Roy Blunt's son Matt was Governor of Missouri. I don't think there are any current examples, though.

[ Parent ]
Rand
Paul is most definitely not a Senator yet.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
And Rory (Reid) seems unlikely to make it either
NV-Gov

[ Parent ]
Rory Reid is running a grassroots campaign
and is trying to be an insurgent candidate.  I go to his facebook page occasionally and I'm fairly impressed by his campaigning methods.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
I don't think with his name
he can be perceived in Nevada as a grassroots insurgent. He is willy-nilly an establishment politician.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
He said after November
He can think of 2 who might be.  

[ Parent ]
My Mistake


Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
SD
WOW, Scotty has the no name who beat the front runner for the Republican nomination in SD-AL beating Herseth-Sandlin by 12!!! Points!

Is this guy even serious?

29/D/Male/NY-01


Republican frontrunner
With no primary polls, how can we tell? She spent more than the 2nd place finisher and raised money at a faster pace than either of her opponents.

[ Parent ]
Some interesting polls that have slipped by me - not new ones.
TN-04 - Lincoln Davis up 11 on either Bailey or DeJarlais, according to Republican pollster OnMessage Inc.  

http://blogs.knoxnews.com/hump...

PA-16 - Joe Pitts up 9 on Lois Herr according to PPP.

http://articles.lancasteronlin...

MI-09 - Gary Peters up 1 on Welday according to Republican pollster Mitchell Research.

http://republicanmichigander.b...

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


PA-16 , interesting
I was already convinced that PA-16's shift from 38% Kerry to 48% Obama was not a fluke but a trend. It will be exciting if PA-16 is competitive this year. I love watching the Republicans lose their last remaining footholds in eastern PA.
Meanwhile the MI-09 poll result is less enjoyable.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
Also, Joe Pitts is a member of The Family
and co-authored that odious Stupak Amendment.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Watch PA-16
It's mostly in Lancaster and Chester counties, two of the biggest movers in the country towards Team Blue in recent elections, and that's not attributable to increased black turnout since this district is considerably whiter than the country as a whole.  

Its present PVI is R+8 but I think that advantage is shrinking.

It's long been ultra-conservative (it was Bob Walker's district) but metro Philadelphia has been creeping westward out to this territory, the Hispanic population has been increasing dramatically, and parts of it are also in the orbit of rapidly-bluing Harrisburg.

The downside is that there's essentially zero Democratic bench there; Republicans utterly dominate local politics in this area. The GOP gerrymander added some Democrats in Reading and West Chester to make its PA-06 more Republican; I wonder if they'd take that same chance for 10 more years with these trends.



36, M, Democrat, MD-03


[ Parent ]
I want to believe the Peters poll, but I don't think I can
I respect Mitchell polling, and they've got a good track record, but I always dislike the polls with "before and after attack message" numbers. I live in the 9th and would be glad to see a Republican win there, but with Peters' money and Welday's weakness as a candidate (he worked for Knollenberg, for whom even I didn't vote), I just don't see this one going red in November.

[ Parent ]
LOL, this guy is nuts.
"The president has demonstrated that he has a default mechanism in him that breaks down the side of race -- on the side that favors the black person."

Rep. Steve King (R-IA)

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-...

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  


His district is so far right he can say whatever he wants
At least with idiots like this around blacks won't be voting Republican any time soon.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
It
prevents him from running statewide though, it really limits his options to being a Congressman forever. Not a horrible job but still I would want the opportunity to move up and it is not going to happen with him.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Well, he just lost
The entire black vote in Iowa. Both of 'em.

Steve King has demonstrated that he has a default mechanism in him that breaks down on the side of crazy-- on the side that favors the crazy.

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
LOL


Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox