Google Ads


Site Stats

A Very Super Tuesday: 5/18 Primary Results Round-Up

by: James L.

Wed May 19, 2010 at 12:56 PM EDT


Last night was a lot of fun, but with over two dozen races worth watching, it's easy to lose track of some of those important but lesser-heralded contests while getting mesmerized by some of the more marquee races that went down last night. Let's do a brief re-cap of everything:

Arkansas:

  • AR-Sen: The big story out of Arkansas is Bill Halter's strong finish in the Democratic Senate primary against Blanche Lincoln. Lincoln ultimately ended the night with a 45-43 result, which was good enough to send this race to a runoff on June 8. Everyone is aflutter that Paulist weirdo D.C. Morrison managed to scoop up 13% of the vote, a higher mark than the polls expected. While it might be tempting to speculate that Morrison's votes will flock to the more right-wing choice in the runoff (Lincoln), I don't really think that's how it works. I'd expect Halter to pick up a share of these voters based purely on anti-incumbent spite, while others may simply crawl back into the woodwork, dissatisfied with both options. And for what it's worth, Morrison says that he won't be supporting either Dem in the runoff (or the general), and guesses that his supporters will split evenly between the two of them.

    On the Republican side, GOP Rep. John Boozman cleared the primary with an easy 53% of the vote over a very fractured Republican field. While Boozman gets the luxury of extra time to refill his war chest, it's not the biggest loss in the world for Dems -- we're only talking about three weeks worth of time here.


  • AR-01: Ex-state Sen. Tim Wooldridge is headed to a runoff against Marion Berry's former Chief of Staff Chad Causey for the Democratic nomination here. Wooldridge, a fairly conservative fellow whom Bill Halter beat in a runoff for the Democratic Lt. Governor nod in 2006, came in first with 39% of the vote. Causey, who was endorsed by Berry and some labor groups, scored 27%. The winner of the runoff will face Republican radio broadcaster Rick Crawford, who easily beat Princella Smith, a former aide to future ex-Rep. Joe Cao, by a 73-27 margin.

  • AR-02: Republicans nominated ex-US Attorney and Rove acolyte Tim Griffin over teabagging restaurateur Scott Wallace by a 62-38 margin, while Democrats sent state Sen. Joyce Elliott, a liberal African-American, to a runoff against state House Speaker Robbie Wills. Elliott won 40% of the vote to 28% for Wills. Departing Dem Rep. Vic Snyder's former Chief of Staff, David Boling, came in third with 19%.

  • AR-03: In a district that is essentially the home base of Republican muscle in Arkansas, it's too bad ex-state Sen. Gunner DeLay didn't manage to force himself into the runoff, if only to give us more opportunities to namedrop him. Instead, Republicans chose Rogers Mayor Steve Womack (31%) and state Sen. Cecile Bledsoe (13%) to advance to the runoff out of a very crowded field.

Kentucky:

  • KY-Sen: In a night of amazing finishes, this one caused a lot of bubbly to be spilled in the SSP comments section. While Rand Paul sleepwalked to a 59-35 win over Trey Grayson, Attorney General Jack Conway executed a remarkable surge in the remaining weeks of the campaign, escaping a double-digit deficit to beat Dan Mongiardo by 44-43 for the Democratic nomination. Perhaps surprisingly, though, Mongiardo is holding out for a recanvass of the vote before he concedes. A recount will unlikely do much good for Dr. Dan, especially when you consider that there are still 13 precincts left to count in Conway-loving Jefferson County.

    Also, if this is any indication of Rand Paul's campaign skills -- hosting his victory party at an exclusive country club and then defending the choice on Good Morning America as non-elitist... because Tiger Woods brought golf to "the city youth" -- this should be a pretty fun campaign.


  • KY-03: Here's another mild surprise. Despite a financial disadvantage, Air Force vet Todd Lally crushed Pizza Hut franchise baron and presumed front-runner Jeff Reetz by a 52-17 margin for the Republican nod to take on two-term Dem Rep. John Yarmuth. Reetz, in fact, did so poorly that he finished in third -- right behind real estate investor Larry Hausman, who took 25% of the vote.

  • KY-06: We initially expected retired coal executive Mike Templeman to give attorney Andy Barr a run for his money for the GOP nod to take on Democratic fixture Ben Chandler, but this race was nothing short of a blow-out. Barr dispatched Templeman by a 64-10 spread.

Oregon:

  • In Oregon, surprises were few and far between. Polling had given ex-Gov. John Kitzhaber a big edge over ex-SoS Bill Bradbury going into the Democratic primary, and that was borne out by Kitzhaber's 66-30 win. Although Bradbury was rhetorically running to Kitzhaber's left, progressives don't need to be disappointed by the result; Kitzhaber's track record is as a health care innovator, and he's clearly eager to push forward on that now that he has a reliably Democratic legislature and the state-level flexibility afforded by the new HCR law. Kitzhaber faces off against Republican victor Chris Dudley, who won with 40% of the vote in a crowded GOP field (which is still less than his 46% career free throw average in the NBA). Dudley fought off a late surge from Allen Alley, who finished at 32%, after trying to make inroads with the conservative wing once Dudley staked out the same moderate turf where Alley had hoped to compete.

    In the Senate race, Dem incumbent Ron Wyden picked up 90% of the vote; he faces a not-very-competitive race against Republican law professor Jim Huffman, the best known out of seven nobodies, who prevailed with 42%. The NRCC got its desired candidates in the two House districts where it's hoping to compete this year. State Rep. Scott Bruun had a solid performance in OR-05, winning with 62%, while Rob Cornilles was a bit more underwhelming, winning with 41% against a teabagger-clogged field in OR-01. (Crisitunity)

Pennsylvania:

  • PA-Sen: You gotta hand it to Joey Sestak. After months of stagnating in the polls and storing his powder safely in airtight Ziploc containers, he used some well-timed late hits to topple Arlen Specter by 54-46 in the Democratic primary. Given that Sestak has actually been performing more competitively than Specter against Republican Pat Toomey (who won his primary over Peg Lutsik by 63 points), this is probably good news over all for team blue.

  • PA-Gov: In the end, it wasn't close. Allegheny Co. Executive Dan Onorato beat state Auditor Jack Wagner by 45-24 for the Democratic gubernatorial nod. Two Philly-area candidates, state Senator (and school voucher advocate) Anthony Williams and ex-Rep. Joe Hoeffel combined for 31% of the vote. Onorato faces a bigger challenge now in defeating Republican AG Tom Corbett. Corbett beat his no-name opposition with 69% of the vote.

  • PA-03: Auto dealer and ex-city councilman Mike Kelly narrowly beat well-funded retired businessman Paul Huber by 28-26. Kelly will be the Republican nominee against frosh Dem Rep. Kathy Dahlkemper this fall.

  • PA-04: Politics ain't beanbag, and Bush-era US Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan found that out the hard way last night. Expected to easily clinch the Republican nomination against Democrat Jason Altmire by beltway progs when she entered the race, her ineptitude on the campaign trail resulted in attorney Keith Rothfus pasting her by 33%. Better luck next time, Mary Beth!

  • PA-06: In a night that gave us some pretty good news all around, this one is particularly special for SSP. Democratic physician Manan Trivedi upset rich guy Doug Pike, who had donated over $1 million of his own money to his campaign effort, by a 51-49 spread. It looks like Pike still hasn't conceded, but he'll have to face the truth sooner rather than later. And here's a nickel's worth of free advice that I'll give to anyone who's interested in running for Congress in the future: You Don't Mess With The Project.

  • PA-10: Another ex-Bush era US Attorney, Tom Marino, was touted as a strong recruit who'd have little difficulty winning his party's nomination against Democrat Chris Carney. Things got a little dicey last night, but Marino did end up succeeding where Mary Beth Buchanan failed. Marino won the nod with a 41% plurality over chiropractor David Madeira and Snyder Co. Commissioner Malcolm Derk.

  • PA-11: If there's one race where things didn't really work out for Democrats, it's this one. Crusty incumbent Rep. Paul Kanjorski beat a divided Democratic primary field with only 49% of the vote -- one of the weakest performances we've seen by an incumbent House member this cycle. That probably doesn't bode well for the general election, where Kanjorski will face off with Lou Barletta for the third time.

  • PA-12: Wow. After all the Republican swagger, did anyone honestly expect Democrat Mark Critz to beat Republican Tim Burns by 53-45 in the special election to replace John Murtha? Certainly Republicans appeared stunned, because I don't think they would have tried to spin yarns like this one if they weren't reeling from the result:

    "Republican Tim Burns ran an excellent campaign in one of the bluest of congressional districts," Mr. Steele said in a statement Tuesday night. "Despite the fact that Pennsylvania's 12th District has been a Democratic stronghold for more than 30 years and Democratic voters outnumber Republicans by more than 2 to 1, Republican Tim Burns pushed his Democratic opponent to the wire."

    "One of the bluest" CDs? Shah! Right! Obviously Mikey was not reading from the same hymnbook as ex-Rep. Tom Davis:

    Tom Davis, a former Republican House member and top party campaign strategist, saw the win by Democrat Mark Critz, a former aide to Mr. Murtha, over Republican Tim Burns as a serious blow to the Republican claim to be within reach of the 40 seats needed to recapture the House.

    "If you can't win a seat that is trending Republican in a year like this, then where is the wave?" asked Mr. Davis, who said Republicans will need to examine what went wrong. "It would be a huge upset not to win this seat."

    Or Charlie Cook, for that matter, from late April:

    Republicans have no excuse to lose this race. The fundamentals of this district, including voters' attitudes towards Obama and Pelosi, are awful for Democrats. And Democratic party registration advantages here are just as obsolete as GOP's advantages in Upstate New York were last year. Timing is no excuse for Republicans either. This special election, not the competitive statewide Democratic primaries held the same day, will be driving turnout on May 18th.

    Meanwhile, Burns managed to win his primary over direct mail scammer Bill Russell by 57-43, which means he gets the pleasure of facing Critz again in November. It's pretty rare for the loser of a special election to win the rematch in the next general election. The last example of such a casualty, that I can come up with, was half-term Dem Rep. Peter Barca, who won a special election against Republican Mark Neumann in 1993. Neumann came back to beat Barca in '94. Otherwise, this type of situation is pretty rare.


  • PA-17: Democrat Tim Holden seemed to aggravate the base of his party with his vote against HCR, resulting in only a 65% win last night over his no-money primary challenger, Sheila Dow-Ford. On the Republican side, state Sen. Dave Argall only managed to beat veteran Frank Ryan by 1.4%.

  • PA-19: Despite speculation that semi-sane GOP Rep. Todd Platts was endangering himself by openly seeking an appointment from Barack Obama to lead the Government Accountability Office, Platts dispatched teabagging challenger Mike Smeltzer by a 70-30 margin.
James L. :: A Very Super Tuesday: 5/18 Primary Results Round-Up
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Map for the PA-Sen and PA-Gov results
http://www.philly.com/philly/g...

Damn.  Specter lost everywhere save for Philadelphia, Harisburg, and Scranton.

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.


Also, anyone know where I can find a map of the Arkansas results?


Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
Just wait!
(working on it!)

[ Parent ]
You are hereby ordered to drop everything else until that map is done.
:p

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
I made a crappy map, it can tide you over until jeff makes a pretty one

Halter is green, Lincoln red. One county hasn't reported yet.


[ Parent ]
Interesting
Lincoln dominated in her and Halter's home county (Pulaski), but Halter dominated in the county that contains Hope (Bill Clinton's hometown)

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
What county is that
and why hasn't it reported yet?

And can it change the game?

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


[ Parent ]
Searcy
looks like it ended up reporting at some point, but only had about 400 votes, so it didn't change anything. It went for Lincoln.

[ Parent ]
The unpaid media coverage for another 3 weeks?
Should be much bigger for Dems in AR-Sen if Halter can pull it out, than 3 weeks of fundraising for Boozman, especially for the lesser-known Halter.  

The further thought occurs
that most of Boozman's large donors are probably already maxed out.

Of course, with Citizen's United, Wal-Mart can literally throw the entire store into his campaign once Halter wins the runoff.

Either way, the 3 weeks for Boozman probably aren't all that significant all things considered.  


[ Parent ]
AR
Hopefully the losing candidates can coalesce support around the alternatives to Wooldridge and Elliott.

Agreed!
AR-2 worries me quite a bit as that seat would be a total lost cause with Elliot.

[ Parent ]
I second that
Elliot, despite her rather big lead in this primary, is, essentially 1-county candidate - she failed to win even a plurality in any county, but Pulaski (which almost always vote Democratic, even for Obama). With minimaly credible Republican candidate she can lose so much in other counties in November, that even Pulaski will not save her candidacy.

Wills's support is not so concentrated, and it's a plus in such situatiom - he will get much more suburban and rural votes while geting "own" in Pulaski. And, while admittedly, somewhat more conservative then Elliot, he is not Wooldridge. And the district isn't very liberal itself, though it's Democratic primary electorate is substantially more liberal then in the state as a whole.

BTW I want to ask ARDem: what progressives intend to do in AR-01 now? Support Causey i suppose? Despite his some "conservative inclinations" he is far more acceptable to them then Wooldridge..


[ Parent ]
Have we actually seen any GE polling in AR-02?
I understand the arguments for why Elliott is a poor choice here, but is there any actual proof she'd go down in flames?

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

I'm actually optimistic about Wilis
State House Speaker, good values for an ancestrally democratic district. If Willis wins the run off, I see this as a toss up that could be a dem hold.

Elliot, poor values and poor ethnicity for the district (I REALLY hate saying that), but there needs to be polling to verify my gut reaction. I would be happy to eat my words here.

Also, as a former TX-22 voter, I am happy to see Gunner DeLay go down in flames, so so HAPPY at that.

26, Male, Democrat, TX-26


[ Parent ]
I Don't Know
I wouldn't be too quick to diagnose what AR-2 will and won't support. For one thing, Snyder has been pretty darn lefty himself (for an Arkansan). For another, until someone explains to me why Lincoln easily beat Halter in Pulaski county, the longtime liberal stronghold of the state, well I think the voters there might be both more left-friendly and confusing than you give them credit for. That's not to say I think she'd win - but I'm reluctant to dismiss her chances.

[ Parent ]
And as for Doug Pike
It's not true, but I think I'm going to convince myself that his is the first campaign on a federal level to lose due to online sockpuppetry.  

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

Lincoln is toast, IMO
More often than not in these southern runoffs, the leader in the first round loses.  Throw in that she was an underperforming incumbent and the lower turnout in the runoff, which will help as Halter's supporters are more dedicated, and you can kiss Blanche goodbye.  Think of it as Sestak-Specter II.

I agree that nearly all of D.C's supporters will not vote in the runoff.  


I hope so.
Hopefully, there is an enthusiasm gap between Blanche supporters and Halter supporters (in our favor).

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
Me too.


My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Author of a book on the subject
Thinks Blanche is in deep doo-doo.

http://washingtonindependent.c...


[ Parent ]
AR-1
Causey's no bargain, but Woolridge makes Olivero look like a flaming liberal.  Here's hoping Causey wins.

Thirded.


My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
I have no problem
Putting up with people that fit their district but not when there is a better alternative. I would still support Wooldridge in the general though if it comes to that.

[ Parent ]
Me too
But probably - after long and deep breath. I like conservative Democrats on rather conservarive districts (just as i like liberals in liberal ones, and so on), but some Wooldridge positions are, well, peculiar at least...

[ Parent ]
Sorry for couple of typos..


[ Parent ]
A good night all around
I think especially Kentucky sets up one of the most fun to watch and competitive Senate races in the country.  I'm looking forward to seeing Conway try to rip the hide off of Rand Paul.

Check out some of the comments on Redstate regarding the PN special election -- they echo what Michael Steele was saying -- that this was an overwhelming Democratic district, that little old Tim Burns never had a chance from the beginning and everyone knew it, that the strategy from the start was never to win, but to make Dems spend money there, etc.  The moderators are even smacking down those who question this "official line."

On NPR this morning Chris Cillizza I think nailed it -- that Republicans must look at this special election and feel sick to their stomachs.  They had a good candidate in a R trending district in what was supposed to be a bad environment right after the health care debate -- and had polling data to say "Just tie Critz to Pelosi and Obama" -- and they got clobbered.


For once the media are doing their job here
I do not include the New York Times in that. Any reason why they would have a vendetta against Blumenthal?

http://politicalwire.com/archi...


[ Parent ]
That question occurred to me as well
Maybe he pissed off a Sulzburger or two at some party.

[ Parent ]
NYT is incompetent
There's no excuse for that bullshit story they ran on Blumenthal.  Apparently in the very same video they used as "proof" -- at the beginning of the unedited version Blumenthal is pretty clear about what he actually did during Vietnam.

They basically bought McMahon's oppo research without bothering to fact-check it.  

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
Because he is a Dick
I am sorry but you don't need a vendetta to come down hard on a guy for lying about his military service for political gain.

Dick Blumenthal is a fraud and maybe even a pathological liar IMHO.

The real question is; is Mr. Blumenthal's apparent theft of valor an occasional slip of the tongue on his part or part disqualifying character trait that the man possesses?

In another words the best you can say about him is he is not a con artist but merely a fool.

Either way Mr. Blumenthal is not the kind of man Democrats (or anyone else for that matter) should want in the US Senate.

(and yes I used to like the guy)

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
BS
Have you seen that video? Total hitjob from the Times.

[ Parent ]
Did you read the Times article?
If you read the Times article you would see it was not just a once time occurance. That Mr. Blumenthal had a pattern of misrepresting his military service to leave the impression that he had served in Vietnam when he had not.

Why is it that over and over again reporters who interviewed him wrote that he was a Vietnam Vet? Why did he never bother to correct the record?

If it was a one time snipped from a video this would be a non story. But he has a pattern of lying and creating an impression that he served in a way that he clearly did not.

Which is why I think he is a fraud and why the Dems would be much better off getting anyone else to run in his place.

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
Of course I read it
Clearly there is evidence he exaggerated but it is not the calamity you seem to think. It is no worse than Hillary's Bosnian adventure.

[ Parent ]
Is that supposed to make us feel better about it?
It was around the time of Hillary's ridiculous Bosnian sniper-claims that I got truly disgusted with her campaign, and fully reconciled myself, as former Edwards afficionado (I know, I know..) to supporting Obama in the primaries.

That kind of crass fabulism for effect says something about a person. Blumenthal claiming to have been in Vietnam, or carefully making sure people will think he served in Vietnam (the whole "having served in the Vietnam era" shtick) is just .. I dunno. The kind of thing that makes you smack your head in incomprehension. Who on earth lies or deceives about something like that? What kind of person does that? Is it arrogance - thinking that nobody will find out - or delusion, like when you want something to be true so badly you sometimes start believing it yourself, or just folly?

I'm kind of surprised how many of us (lefties, I mean) swat away these revelations as a pesky non-issue, stressing how Blumenthal will weather this one. He well might, and of course it's still better to get him than a Republican, but should there not be some space, even in the most politicized of environments, for us to say, waitaminute - that just ain't right?

It sucks that there doesn't seem to be a credible, electable alternative to him .. cause I sure would prefer some other Dem now.

38, Male, SP, NL / LMP, HU


[ Parent ]
sorry, "think" should have been italicized, not bolded


38, Male, SP, NL / LMP, HU

[ Parent ]
There are credible, electable alternatives
in the form of the rest of the CT House delegation, Dan Malloy, Ned Lamont, and possibly even Susan Bysiewicz if depending on her approvals.

It's just a matter of whether the D-trip feels this is a big enough deal to tell Blumenthal to step aside and let someone else run.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


[ Parent ]
DSCC, not DCCC.


Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
I thought "D-trip" just meant the Democratic establishment in general
which is what I was referring to.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
Nope
"D-trip" is short for "D triple C," specifically the Democratic house committee.

[ Parent ]
Wow, I didnt know that either


[ Parent ]
Purity isn't always ideological


[ Parent ]
"former Edwards aficionado"
I'm so sorry. I was considering switching to him back a bit before he dropped out of the race, but I stayed with Obama (largely because I already had the T-shirt, and of course I knew he had a much better chance of actually getting the nomination).

He wasn't a bad candidate, based on what we knew about him.

überliberal Democrat, male, OH-12 (college), NJ-09 ("home"), Mets, Jets


[ Parent ]
The NYT also includes a companion article
detailing Chris Shays' perspective on the subject. He was quite kind to Blumenthal's history, w/r/t his speeches citing his military service over the years.

Personally, I think it's closer to how Al Gore evolved to saying that he invented the Internet.


[ Parent ]
except
Al Gore never said that--he said he created the internet--but Dick Armey did a helluva job misleading people otherwise. (of course, this isn't just a Republican thing--I think it might have been Bill Moyers? who claimed that what's-his-face from the Reagan administration said we don't need to take care of the environment because Jesus will come back soon.)

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
I hesitate to get off track
But the actual quote was "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet." It was a gaffe but his meaning was clear.

[ Parent ]
If you want to get into that
I could go into the legislation that Gore sponsored that created the regulatory conditions that made the Internet possible, but that's a side discussion to have after four drinks.

[ Parent ]
Yup
That was Al's problem. Having the record is one thing but if you can't get it across to people in a way they understand you are screwed.

[ Parent ]
I agree
I just wanted to air my gripes with the word "invented" since the Rs have done such a good job at smearing him over that.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
The meat of the Times piece
Was that Blumenthal said he served "in Vietnam" in a 2008 speech. Now that the video is out you can see that literally literally two minutes earlier he had correctly identified himself as a Vietnam-era veteran. Appalling hit job.

[ Parent ]
The problem is the meat of the Times piece is true!
I am sorry but that extended video is NOT exculpatory. If anything it is actually more damning. The key here is that in it Blumenthal NEVER states he was in the Marines RESERVES. In fact he starts by saying "As someone who served in the Military during Vietnam Era, in the Marine Corp..." then he adds "Do we have any Marine Corp Veterans here? Raise your hand" and the Mr. Blumenthal raises his hand and says "Semper Fi". Give me a break!

Blumenthal was clearly trying to deceived the audience of Veterans to make it seem like served in away that he clearly did not. Any rational person listening to that speech would only walk away with the impression that Dick Blumenthal served in Vietnam in the US Marine Corps which we all know he did not. That's what he was trying to do lie to his audience.

As a lawyer and Attorney General of CT Mr. Blumenthal of all people knows how to parse his words and has a history of choosing what he says very carefully. It is clear that on purpose he choose to give the impression he was a Vietnam Veteran when he was not to score political points with his audience.

And to be honest with you I threw up a little when I heard him say "Semper Fi".

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
And have you done any research
Aside from reading the NYT article? Because while I am quick to make fun of the media for being stupid, this really was a shameful hitjob on a guy who seems like a pretty decent human being (for a politician).

Did he use bad phrasing maybe once or twice? Yes. But compare that to Dubya who fucking lied his ass off repeatedly about his Vietnam service and then made CBS eat its (totally accurate) story about the whole affair. Meanwhile, Blumenthal never intended to mislead people as far as I can tell and was quick to accurately describe his actions as soon as there were questions.

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
I know I do
I almost threw up watching the returns come in. I was totally crushed. It wouldn't have been as bad if the people on the ground there weren't telling me all day that it looked great for us, and that the campaign was doing better than it had expected with GOTV. I had been very pessimistic heading into yesterday, but they made me more optimistic. Today I almost didn't do anything political.  

[ Parent ]
While I disagree with you politically
you're a good person, and hope that other things in your life go well. It takes gumption to post regularly on a site where most disagree with you, while still retaining a sense of grace.

Just a tidbit, I've learned to wait for returns as opposed to the temptations of preliminary reports "from the ground".


[ Parent ]
I ignored politics last night, only checking it at like 2:30 AM
From my experience, it seems that I get better results that way.  Or maybe it's only because I'm less caught up in the moment and crash less if and when my hopes are dashed.

So from now on, a personal rule: I do not follow election returns as they come in.  Okay, unless there's a watch party or something going on.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


[ Parent ]
Two more bits of good news today
One, PPP is out with CO-sen general election numbers

Bennet (D) 44
Norton (R) 41

Bennet (D) 45
Buck (R) 39

Romanoff (D) 43
Norton (R) 41

Romanoff (D) 41
Buck (R) 38

Two, even Rasmussen finds Blumenthal leading McMahon 48-45 and Simmons 50-39. Assuming this is his low water point and given who the pollster is, I am more than happy with that.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


Ras
I predicted this gaffe would cost Blumenthal a net 10% in votes and that's what Rasmussen finds.  Meaning, pollsters who aren't Rasmussen and had Blumenthal ahead by 30% instead of 13% (Ras' last poll had Blumenthal only up 13 points on McMahon) will soon find Blumenthal "only" up by 20 points.

This will blow over.  I can't believe everyone panicked so hard.  He misspoke, that's it.


[ Parent ]
Direct mail scammer?
Bill Russell is really a scammer and won 43% of the vote in a Republican primary? I missed details on allegations of fraud. Is he under legal investigation?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


No, he was the one getting scammed.
The alleged scammers are the firm that worked to raise money for him.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
I think the donors are the ones getting scammed
Bill Russell is just a willing accomplice. BMW sends out provocative direct mail in order to raise huge amounts of money for campaigns, and then takes the lion's share of the funds raised for themselves. They do all the work, and get most of the profit. Russell (and the like) get a piece of the action, with most of it going to line the pockets of BMW/BaseConnect. Russell has defended this arrangement on several occasions -- he knows exactly what he's doing.

(Note that Joe Cao severed ties with BaseConnect after being exposed as a client.)


[ Parent ]
First Grayson, next is Norton
Erik Erickson of Redstate fame just declared war on Norton and will be rallying the troops for Ken Buck.

Keep it going morans!


HEY MAN !! Give credit where it is due...
Jim DeMint is the kingmaker of the right, Redstate is just a bandwagoner.

;p

I can't wait for the next DeMint endorsement.  NH maybe?? Jim, you don't want to wait too long either.  You couldda had Stutzman too, ya know.      


[ Parent ]
Expectations Gaming in HI-01
http://www.starbulletin.com/ed...

italics mine

The stakes are high for Hawaii Republicans, too. Several polls show Djou well ahead, and he raised expectations by indicating he has the race pretty much sewed up. A narrow win would deflate the GOP's high hopes that Djou is more than a temporary hindrance to the Democrats. And an exceptionally strong finish would signal big trouble for Hawaii's long-dominant party, given that every powerful Democrat from Daniel K. Inouye on down has put clout on the line in this race.


I expect something like
Djou 40, Case 30, Hanabusa 20, Others 10. Though I wouldn't completely rule out a shock Case or even Hanabusa win. Nothing would make me laugh more.

[ Parent ]
Losing PA-12 is one thing
but if they lose HI-01, 2010 will be much better for Dems than we thought a few months ago. If Djou wins with, I dunno, mid 40s or higher, to me that signifies a recapturing of the momentum they had between Nov 2009 and Jan 2010 (MA-Sen).

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
I just realized that was unclear
the first "they" in that post refers to Republicans.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
HI-01 isn't as big as PA-12
The unique situation of a plurarity only win with two Democrats on the ballot means that it would be fairly easy for the Democrats to write off a loss, while for the GOP the fact it is Obama's birth district (Remember his CURRENT district is Bobby Rush's IL-01) would allow them to write off an unexpected loss.

Assume Djou wins, he needs at least 40% of the vote to have a credible shot of holding the district in November. Less than 40% would mean that a single Democrat (Case or Hanubusa) would easily defeat him in November. A win by 45% or more would mean that Democrats can't simply write him off and that an incumbent Djou would not be easy to dislodge in 2010 (although no matter what happens, a Djou held HI-01 would be one of the few GOP held toss-ups, and the only one held by an incumbent besides Cao).

Also if Djou wins 45% or more in the special and then wins a full term by 53% or more, then it would be an indication that he could survive for another one with Obama on the ballot, althrough it would be very difficult. If Djou wins the special and only barely wins the November (2% or less) then he would easily be swamped under Obama's coattails in 2012. These aren't presice estimates just a general idea of what I feel would happen.

I suspect that in the special that Djou will get a vote closer to how Bush did in 2004 and less like how McCain did in 2008, and get about 42% of the vote, with Case getting 30% and Hanabusa getting 28% (Case being ahead narrowly because of name recognition. May not be exactly that because there are also two no name Democrats and one no name Republican in the special election but I don't seem them getting more than 1 percent of the vote combined.


[ Parent ]
I agree with your analysis
Djou's overall percentage of the vote will be instructive for how he will perform in one-on-one contests.

This is not a seat that Republicans can hold long-term, not anymore for that matter.


[ Parent ]
I know
which is why this is a must-win for the GOP. they have a split D vote AND they got the DCCC to give up AND they're leading in the polls AND Djou essentially declared victory. If the GOP wins HI-01 it will be a shot in the arm albeit not enough to make up for PA-12. but if they lose HI-01, that could mean bad news for Pete Sessions.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
I think its about as meaningful as Cao in Louisiana
Sometimes bad races happen.  A special with the fiasco that this race has ebcome really doesn't paint any picture or give any momentum in my book.  I really do see this as akin to Cao winning Jefferson's seat in Lousiana in that fiasco.  In a short time Cao will be gone, and so too will Djou.  They can't really do any damage in their short time in Congress either.


[ Parent ]
yes but
we know how the media loves its drama.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
wow at the story
you linked to for AR-Sen. Not only does DC Morrison think Blanche will win the runoff, he even thinks she'll beat Boozman!

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


Even though he'll vote for Boozman
... and he thought he would do much better!

The guy marches to his own drummer for sure.


[ Parent ]
Implications of PA-12
Neither party should read too much into this race other than that local political attitudes matter.  PA-12 is a Democrat bastion in everything but presidential elections.  The one take away I would suggest is that we might be seeing the local politics of regions matter more than the national politics.  This means we might see some sort of a reset in places like Pennsylvania in terms of the trendlines.  For example, PA-12 went heavily Democratic, but the Republicans had a higher turnout than the Democrats in PA-7 and PA-8 even though they had largely uncontested races.  This means the PVI might matter less than the local politics of an area.

This is a good thing though.  Our politics have become too nationalized, which is killing the parties in some areas.


23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


Quote
"The one take away I would suggest is that we might be seeing the local politics of regions matter more than the national politics."

Absolutely that is they key and it will save many seats this November. Still, I would be very wary of dismissing PVI so readily.


[ Parent ]
Agreed.
I too am happy to see the "all politics is local" line come back to life. Hopefully that will help tone down the crazy polarization some, not to mention make the races even more fun to watch, rather than the repeating of how an unpopular president or unpopular law will drag down so-and-so or help so-and-so, blah blah blah.

Plus, predicting how races may go with "all politics is local" will probably be more fun and give me more incentive to research each state/district, and see what issues need to be emphasized in order for a candidate to pull out a win, rather than seeing how, say, Obama or health care reform fare in each state/district.

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
The hope then becomes the reality then the nightmare
I mean all politics is local is great, but the very same people who believe that also want progressive's everywhere.

We have blogs everyone, even on this site, where people love "all politics is local" but then will post 10 minutes later how much they dislike someone like Holden voting against HRC.  Even though HRC is unpopular in his district and he is doing his job representing his district views, people then dislike him for that vote.  Some say they "give him a pass", but why would that be giving him a pass if he's doing his swarn duty?  Oh becuase he doesn't hold to one of the primary goals of the party.

If we want all politics is local, then there probably wouldn't be so much vitriol for Blanche Lincoln or some other conserva-Dems.  We can't have it both ways.



[ Parent ]
I had the same observation
"For example, PA-12 went heavily Democratic, but the Republicans had a higher turnout than the Democrats in PA-7 and PA-8 even though they had largely uncontested races."

Ditto in PA-6. The combined GOP vote(Gerlach and some dude)was higher than the combined DEM primary vote (Trivendi and Pike) which is bizarre.


NV-Sen: Club for Growth backs Sharron Angle
Has DeMint chimed in here yet?


[ Parent ]
UT-Sen
Taegan Goddard says Bennett could decide as early as tomorrow about a write-in campaign.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


A Bennet write-in would be interesting.
Assuming that the write-in is in the general and not the primary, it wouldnt' really matter because Utah is so conservative AND Republican and the Democratic candidate Granato is a no name businessman. Perhaps if Matheson was the Dem nominee he could have a chance if Bennet and whoever the Republican candidate is splits right wing vote, but even then that is hard to see seeing as how write-in campaigns fail to get much traction even for someone well known, and Matheson could still lose in this environment. Granato certainly can't.

[ Parent ]
If Bennet decides to do a write-in
Let's make sure we lock Specter away so he doesn't get any ideas.  I know he's promised to work to get Sestak elected, but Arlen always leave me weary of trusting him.

He reminds me of Ben on the TV series "Lost" who was shady all the while, then seems to get turned the right way, but you just never know what's really in his heart.


[ Parent ]
MN-Gov poll
http://minnesota.publicradio.o...

Minnesota Public Radio/Humphry Institute poll

DFL Primary

Dayton 35%
Kelliher 28%
Entenza 6%
Undecided 25%

There are also general election numbers (race is virtually  tied for every combination) and job approval numbers for Obama(51), Kloubachar(64), Franken(48) and Pawlenty(43) and Congress(23).

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan


GOP had a higher turnout than Democrats in Kentucky yesterday.
For all that nonsense about more Dem votes than GOP.

http://ht.ly/1Nizx


Nonsense is harsh
The first line of your link says exactly what people were saying last night. Fair enough though, the percentage of registered voters was higher. Good for them. Rand Paul is still a recipe for disaster though.

[ Parent ]
They had a higher turnout among a smaller number of people.
The first line of that article explicitly states that there were more Dem primary votes than Repub primary votes, in absolute numbers.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
People love their percentages
We've become a world of amateur statiscians.  People forget that its actual votes that are counted sometimes when they do their analysis.

[ Parent ]
34% of Republicans
and 32% of Democrats voted, with a higher profile, nationalized Republican primary.

If that's the enthusiasm gap in November, I'll take it.

And WTF does "all that nonsense about more Dem votes than GOP" mean? There were more Dem votes than GOP.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
Um, no they didn't
Don't be afraid, math is your friend.

Next up, the Constituition party has higher turnout than Dems or republicans.  LOL


[ Parent ]
In Oregon,
can our candidate, Susan Castillo (8 year inc.) hang onto the SofPI? She has has a 3800 vote lead over ex-GOP state rep Ron Maurer. There are eight remaining precincts, but are there any other votes to be counted?  

There might be a runoff in Nov
http://blog.oregonlive.com/map...

But currently she has 50.08%

Fortunately, most of the remaining ballots are Multnomah (Portland area).

The Oregonian called this race in Castillo's favor last night, and reporter Betsy Hammond, who led the numbers team, says Castillo still looks like the victor.  She said that Multnomah County ballots make up a large portion of those left to be counted - and Castillo is handily winning in that county.


[ Parent ]
Wait, how can the margin be so close yet still be a runoff possibility?
Are we talking about a situation where the tiny portion of write-ins could determine whether a mainly two-person race has the winner over 50% and thus avoids or gets thrown into a runoff?

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
Yup, a strange OR law I think limited to nonpartisan elections
Your presumption is correct.

In most cases, such elections are not severely contested. But if no candidate gets 50%+1 vote, the "runoff" is held between the top-2 candidates on the regular Nov. date.

While there were only 2 candidates on that particular ballot, something like .3% were for write-ins.

There will be a runoff for the Portland area "Metro" chair, as that was a pretty close 3-way race.


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox