Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 3/18 (Afternoon Edition)

by: Crisitunity

Thu Mar 18, 2010 at 2:50 PM EDT


NV-Sen: It's starting to look like the investigation into John Ensign may really take off. The DOJ is actually serving subpoenas to at least six different Las Vegas area businesses, as they expand a criminal probe into the tangle of quid pro quos that arose as Ensign tried to find lobbying work for cuckolded friend Doug Hampton.

CA-Gov: Usually politicians wait to say this kind of thing privately instead of publicly, but maybe Jerry Brown, as is his way, is engaged in some sort of Jedi mind trick. Brown openly encouraged his union allies to start spending now in the governor's race and to go on the attack against likely GOP opponent Meg Whitman, so that he can stay "the nice guy" in the race.

MI-Gov: Chris Cillizza has access to a new poll from Inside Michigan Politics/Marketing Resource Group, which looks at the Republican primary in the Michigan Governor's race. It's more evidence that businessman Rick Snyder's splashy spending and catchy "one tough nerd" ad has turned this into a real three-way race. The poll finds AG Mike Cox and Rep. Peter Hoekstra tied at 21, with Snyder right there at 20. Oakland Co. Sheriff Mike Bouchard trails, at 10.

NY-Gov: Guess who doesn't like the idea of running a Democrat for the Republican nomination for Governor (even if NY GOP head Ed Cox seems to think it's the best idea since sliced bread)? The RNC has threatened not to put money into New York races (and note that says "races," not just the Gov's race) if Democratic Suffolk Co. Exec Steve Levy winds up the GOP's nominee. Meanwhile, David Paterson's case just gets weirder and weirder, as now he's saying he himself was the anonymous source for the NYT story on his interceding on his aide's behalf.

WY-Gov: It's still not clear that state Sen. Mike Massie is going to run for Governor on the Democratic side, but it is looking like he's planning to move up. He confirmed he won't run for his Senate seat again, although he's interested in Superintendent of Public Education as well as Governor.

NY-24: Chalk Rep. Mike Arcuri up as a "no" vote on health care reform. This comes despite the threat of losing the Working Families Party line in November, which will probably imperil his chances of re-election more so than any Republican votes he might pick up (which will probably equal zero, regardless of how he might vote on HCR).

NY-29: Corning mayor Tom Reed has a bright idea on how to pay for the special election caused by Eric Massa's resignation: make Massa pay for it, out of the money in his campaign fund (which is roughly equal to the actual cost of holding the election). Not that it's going to happen, but it raises an interesting question: is there a legal mechanism for Massa to write a $644K check to the state of New York out of his account?

PA-12 (pdf): There's a second poll of the 12th, from a slightly more established pollster (although one who still requires a grain or two of salt): Republican pollster Susquehanna. Their numbers are pretty close to the weird robopoll from yesterday, finding Democrat Mark Critz leading Republican Tim Burns 36-31. Bad news for Dems: by a 49/44 margin, voters want to turn away from a candidate who, in the John Murtha tradition, supports earmarks for the district. Good news for the Dems: of the undecideds, 67% are Democrats, meaning that Critz has more room to grow.

VA-11: Rich guy Keith Fimian is up with his first radio ad in the 11th, attacking Democratic Rep. Gerry Connolly for saying, in reference to the stimulus, "I want to be there with all four paws and snout in the trough." Um, yeah... except Connolly was saying that long after the stimulus passage, making fun of Eric Cantor's hypocrisy on the issue. Too bad snark tags don't translate to radio very well.

NY-Something: Former Republican Lt. Governor, and then unsuccessful former health care industry spokesbot, Betsy McCaughey, apparently is looking for a way into the Republican field in one of the various statewide races in New York; she's been polling both races. (There's one small wrinkle: she's still registered as a Democrat, and voted in the 2009 Democratic primary. She became a Dem after George Pataki dropped her from his 1998 ticket, and tried to run against Pataki as a Dem instead.)

Votes: After all the sturm and drang surrounding the cloture vote, the final vote on the Senate jobs bill was pretty uninteresting, with 11 different GOPers crossing the aisle to vote for it: Alexander, Bond, Brown, Burr, Cochran, Collins, Inhofe, LeMieux, Murkowski, Snowe, and Voinovich.

WATN?: A must-read editorial in today's WaPo comes from ex-Rep. Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, whose despite her two years in the House looms large in history as the decisive vote on the 1993 Clinton budget, which is usually assigned as the reason for her loss in 1994. She pushes back against the mind-numbing Beltway conventional wisdom that your electoral survival depends on bucking the party line on the tough votes, and seems to be weighing on the minds of members like the aforementioned Mike Arcuri. A wave is a wave, and it takes out those in unsafe districts who vote for or vote against; the key is to not let the wave become a wave in the first place:

Votes like this are never a zero-sum game.... While it is easy to say my balanced-budget vote cost me reelection, that assumes the line of history that followed the bill's passage. Had I voted against it, the bill wouldn't have passed, the Republican opposition would have been emboldened, the Clinton presidency would have moved into a tailspin . . . and all of this could have just as easily led to my undoing.

Simply put, you could be Margolies-Mezvinskied whether you vote with or against President Obama. You will be assailed no matter how you vote this week. And this job isn't supposed to be easy. So cast the vote that you won't regret in 18 years.

There's still one strange contention in her piece: that "I was in the country's most Republican district represented by a Democrat." Sorry, not even close: that district would've been R+4 at the time, based on its 1988 and 1992 results, good for 51st most Republican held by a Democrat. Even though she famously got bounced out in 1994, the 13th was promptly back in Democratic hands in 1998, courtesy of Joe Hoeffel (and now, thanks to trends in the Philly suburbs and thanks to redistricting, it's a safe Dem district). The most Republican district held by a Dem in 1993? FL-01, then held by Earl Hutto, at R+20. (Hutto retired in 1994, giving way to... wait for it... Joe Scarborough.)

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 3/18 (Afternoon Edition)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

What the hell Michael Steele?
As a Democrat I LOVE what he's doing.  But when will he get it through his head that his job is to shut up and raise money and engage in low level party building.  The RNC like the DNC doesn't NEED to have a view on who should and shouldn't be nominated.  There is a Senatorial, Gubernatorial, and Congressional committee that is much better equipped to make strategy concerning primaries.

Whether or not he can win or get nominated for Governor having Steve Levy is good news for the GOP because it removes yet another county executive from Democratic hands and calls into question whether previous Democratic gains in Long Island are temporal given Suozzi's surprise loss and Levy's potential defection.

Of course I don't get why Levy picked this time and race to try a party switch.  Challenging Bishop or even Israel would've been more realistic than Cuomo.

And the party registration issue is why I didn't think Mort Zuckerman would run for Senate.  Given Levy risks not even getting on the Republican ballot this move just seems loopy.

NY-13, Democrat. Blog @ http://infinitefunction.wordpr...


Temporal?
Do you mean temporary? But if so, isn't everything temporary?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Steele
He likes to talk a big game but he never does what he says. He also told them he wouldn't give them any money if Scozzafava was the Republican nominee and he ended up (along with the NRCC) being her only source of funding.  

[ Parent ]
Margolies-Mezvinsky is probably referring to registration
I would not be surprised if the 13th were heavily Republican by registration in the early 90s.  

Or maybe
It had something to do with the fact that the district had been in GOP hands from 1916 until her victory in 1992.

[ Parent ]
PA-13
I grew up in PA-13.  It was tons of fun there, we were the closest district in the country for a few elections, including Jon Fox's 84 vote win over Hoeffel in 96.  On the one hand, Clinton carried the district both times, but on the other hand, there was a 2:1 Republican registration advantage back in those days.  At the local level, Democrats had trouble filling all their ballot spots and conventional wisdom was that the Republicans dominated everything.  It's remarkable how quickly that turned around.

[ Parent ]
a lot of credit ...
... goes to Allyson Schwartz herself.  She is a tenacious fundraiser, and I truly mean that in the best way.  Also, for whatever reason I believe she's doing better in the NE Phila part of the district than Hoeffel had.

[ Parent ]
Schwartz
She has done a great job.  I think the main reason she's done better there is the fact that she's from Philly, albeit not the Northeast, and Hoeffel is from Montgomery County.  Also, don't forget that Hoeffel only had that part of the district in 2002, which was a more Republican year than the elections since then.

I also give some of the credit to Melissa Brown.  Those right wing campaigns she ran every 2 years turned off many of the moderates that made up the district.


[ Parent ]
Party line
Amazing.  The Baucus bill, which is essentially the current health insurance bill, was subject to withering criticism last year.  From Democrats.  Now it has become the "party line"?  The problem is not failing to support the party.  It's supporting the party line at the expense of party principle.

From liberals
Most Democrats supported it.

[ Parent ]
Blah blah blah
If you want you to go find the votes, then by all means, go for it.  The rest of us living in reality will take what we can get, because accomplishing something that does 90% of our goals is better than 0% and not having the stink of failure for November certainly makes up for the lack of progressiveness.

[ Parent ]
Thanks
Some people on other liberal blogs think I am too moderate just for wanting to get meaningful legislation done, even if it is not 100% progressive. They hate it when I dare stand up for a moderate democrat like Brad Ellsworth or Charlie Melancon. I mean I am a very progressive democrat, but I am a realist at the same time.

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Me too.


My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Well, the hope/expectation initially

was that the bill that would be passed would actively accomplish something serious (aka great).

The current rallying to it is based on hope/expectation that this bill, minimal or inadequate as it is, opens the door to modifications.

In fact, maybe it's a good idea under the circumstances to pass a bill that has some serious defects that will force Congress to readdress it.


[ Parent ]
New Wisconsin Senate Poll
Thompson-47
Feingold-45

Feingold-49
Wall-40

Feingold-51
Westlake-35

Actually those aren't horrible numbers.

http://www.rasmussenreports.co...

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  


Rass can kiss my ass.


20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)

[ Parent ]
Inhofe?
WTF, Inhofe, are you becoming soft?  Supporting a Demmuhcrat bill?

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

NY-Sen/Gov: Betsy McCaughey gearing up for 2010 run?
I love that she's still a Dem.
I wonder which race she'd go for.

[ Parent ]
Heh
That was actually discussed in the very same post you're replying to...

[ Parent ]
I LOVE this poll!
Florida Senate- Daily Kos/Research 2000

Rubio-58
Crist-30

Now the good part

Rubio-41
Meek-40

Rubio-32
Crist-29
Meek-27

http://www.dailykos.com/storyo...

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  


This has the potential to suprise
Just sayin'.

[ Parent ]
This confirms what we saw a few weeks ago.
I don't remember who did the poll, but that one, like this, showed Kendrick Meek doing better against Rubio than Crist would if he were to switch parties.  

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
I just read the whole poll, this is a must read
Other polling has shown Rubio blowing past Crist, so that's not so much news. But only we are asking this question:

Do you believe that Barack Obama was born in the United States of America, or not? (Republican primary voters only)

Yes 33 (35)
No  30 (29)
Not sure 37 (36)

Obama born in US:
Rubio: 23 (16)
Crist: 66 (73)

Obama not born un US:
Rubio: 74 (54)
Crist:  8 (31)

Not Sure where Obama was born:
Rubio: 76 (45)
Crist: 16 (33)

Looks like Florida has some birthers. Also Marcos throws in Democratic primary numbers showing Meek beating Crist. He also runs Crist as a democrat with Rubio leading him 40-38.



Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  


[ Parent ]
I'm not very excited about the Meek numbers
He's benefiting from all the negative stuff Crist and Rubio are throwing at each other, and he's still not ahead of Rubio. I still can't see Florida supporting a liberal African American in a statewide election, especially this year.  

[ Parent ]
Meek
isn't that liberal, he's a member of the DLC. That "negative stuff" could carry on to the general. Rubio is an extremist republican, and people will understand that come November. Also look at the fact nobody knows who Meek is. He is this close despite his high unknowns.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Obama
nuff said.  If a liberal black guy from Chicago can win here, so can one from SoFL.

[ Parent ]
I'd probably say he's doing this well...
Because he's unknown. And 2010 isn't going to be 2008 (also Obama barely won Florida)

I think it's wishful thinking, but I hope you're right


[ Parent ]
If you told me a year ago
that Kendrick Meek would ever, under any circumstances, be outpolling Alex Sink in two simultaneous statewide Florida races, I would have accused you of smoking something.

The Crolian Progressive: as great an adventure as ever I heard of...

[ Parent ]
Hawt damn
Today is a good day for polls

Meek trailing Rubio by 1 point?

Hayworth withing 7 points of David Gregory's sidekick John McCain?!!

Some people are worried about 2010, but I say bring it on.

All I can say is that August 24, 2010 is going to be VERY exciting (AK, AZ and FL Primary days)

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)


Which is why I dont think it is necessarily an anti-Democrat year
Im hoping the teabagging insurgents show that it's really just anti-incumbent and the GOP are stupidly thinking they can just run any ole tea-bagger and take advantage of the bad environment for us.

[ Parent ]
Kos (hearts) Kucinich?
Well just a little bit. Kucinich will probably be back to being a prick next week. http://www.dailykos.com/storyo...
#  Who took the old Kucinich and replaced him with this pragmatic one? I like this new look much better.

# Retiring Rep. John Shaddeg, among the most conservative Republicans in the House, now says he would support single-payer health care.

 

Shaddeg
Oops sorry, I was sloppy with my copying and pasting in the quote above.
However that bit I accidentally included about Shaddeg is kind of interesting, too.
Isn't it funny how retiring politicians suddenly can feel free to stray from their party doctrine...

[ Parent ]
Re: Shadegg
What's utterly mystifying is that Shadegg came out in favor of the public option (at least in spirit) two months ago.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

Question #1 in my brain is: WHY WASN'T THIS A BLARING HEADLINE WHEN IT HAPPENED? And question #2: Would things have unfolded differently if it actually were? (My instinct on the latter, sadly, is yes... at least to a degree.)

Male, 23, DC-At Large


[ Parent ]
that Paterson story is becoming weirder than weird
from above:
Meanwhile, David Paterson's case just gets weirder and weirder, as now he's saying he himself was the anonymous source for the NYT story on his interceding on his aide's behalf.

And now: New York Times denies Paterson was source
But in a blog post Thursday, Times reporters Danny Hakim and Nicholas Confessore say that's not true.
Huh?


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox