Premium Sponsor


Featured Sponsor


Our Sponsors


Google Ads

Ad Networks

Advertise Liberally

Buy an ad on all of the top liberal blogs with just one click.

Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 3/9 (Afternoon Edition)

by: Crisitunity

Tue Mar 09, 2010 at 4:42 PM EST


AR-Sen: Like I always say, flip-flopping at every opportunity is the best way to win elections. Then:

Lincoln: I Will Fight Reconciliation as Tool to Achieve Health Insurance Reform

Now:

Asked twice whether she was wavering on her previous statements to vote against a reconciliation bill, Lincoln said: "I'll wait to see what's in it."

Considering she already voted for healthcare reform in the first place, this actually is probably the better move for her, believe it or not. (D)

CO-Sen, CO-Gov: More evidence that the teabaggers and assorted other movement conservative aren't takin' kindly to outsiders coming in and imposing Jane Norton on them. Norton lost a GOP straw poll to right-wing Weld County DA Ken Buck after a Denver candidate forum sponsored by the Tea Partiers and 9-12ers. Interestingly, no-name Dan Maes also triumphed over ex-Rep. Scott McInnis on the gubernatorial side.

LA-Sen: Rep. Charlie Melancon is going on the offensive, having a lot of ground to make up against David Vitter if polls are any indication. He's filed an ethics complaint against Vitter for having violated federal law by sending out fundraising appeals on official Senate letterhead.

NY-Sen-B: Hardcore movement conservative and - get this - former chief economist for Bear Stearns (!!) David Malpass says he's weighing a run against Kirsten Gillibrand, presumably as a Republican. Jonathan Chait hits all the high points as to how badly out-of-touch Malpass is, and Paul Krugman zings him for an especially good bit of moranocity. If I were Gillibrand, I think I'd love to go up against a mouthbreather like this. (D)

PA-Sen: Arlen Specter got a boost from labor, with an endorsement from the United Auto Workers. Also, speaking of Pennsylvania, check out my latest installment at Salon.com, where I used the disparate polling in PA-Sen as a means of introducing the non-SSP-reading masses to the idea of polling likely voters vs. registered voters.

WA-Sen: It looks like the NRSC hasn't given up on trying to lure Dino Rossi into the Senate race, as Rossi has confirmed having had a conversation with John Cornyn about it. Rossi continues to maintain a "never say never" attitude about it in the face of questions. The NRSC may also have a Plan B if Rossi says no, that's an upgrade from their current top candidate, state Sen. Don Benton. They're also interested in former news anchor Susan Hutchison. Despite presenting a somewhat moderate profile and the advantage of running without an "R" next to her name in the nonpartisan race, she still managed to rack up only 41% while losing November's King County Executive race. (Still, that makes her only a one-time loser, compared with Rossi's two strikes.) Hutchison says that she's undecided, and she'll wait for Rossi's decision to make her own.

IA-Gov: One other candidate who's not faring so well in the straw poll venue, despite an overwhelming consensus from the political establishment, is ex-Gov. Terry Branstad. He just lost a quick succession of three different county-level straw polls to social conservative Bob Vander Plaats, and these aren't dinky rural counties either. Vander Plaats cleaned up in Woodbury County (his home turf of Sioux City), while earning narrow victories in Story County (Davenport Ames) and Dallas County (Des Moines suburbs).

NY-Gov: Andrew Cuomo may not be a declared candidate for Governor just yet, but he's certainly fundraising like one. His camp is planning to hold a high-priced fundraiser in DC on March 22nd with some high-powered Democratic money players in attendance. (JL) Some of David Paterson's nosediving approvals may have rubbed off a bit on Cuomo, if Marist's new snap poll (pdf) is any indication: Cuomo's approval is down to a relatively human 54/39. Paterson is at an appalling 19/79, but 68% say he might as well still serve out his term with 28% saying resign. Still trying to find an upgrade from the lackluster campaign of Rick Lazio to go up against Cuomo, the GOP is meeting with conservaDem Suffolk Co. Exec Steve Levy (who's been mulling a run in the Democratic primary) to try and get him to switch over to the GOP line to run for Governor.

DE-AL: Republicans may have found an upgrade in the Delaware at-large seat, which has pretty much already slipped out of their grasp but where they can at least force former Democratic Lt. Gov. John Carney to work for it. They're courting philanthropist Michele Rollins, the widow of former Republican Lt. Gov. John Rollins (and a former Miss USA) who has access to her former husband's personal fortune.

LA-02: Rep. Joe Cao seems to have read yesterday's big expose of BaseConnect (the former BMW Direct) at TPM, and it seems to have been the first time he'd learned that they're up to no good. He just severed all ties with the group, who've been doing his fundraising for the last year (and skimming off almost all his proceeds, which explains his terrible burn rate). Does this mean that no one from the NRCC was giving him any guidance on how to raise funds? It doesn't seem like the kind of scam an incumbent would ordinarily fall for.

NY-23: Doug Hoffman's made it official - he's going to try to win the Republican, Conservative, and Independence Party nominations, "and unite them, as one team, to defeat the agenda of Nancy Pelosi and Bill Owens." Sounds like someone has seen the Lord of the Rings movies a few times too many. This also seems a wee bit delusional, since of course most of the Independence Party quickly embraced Owens (who seems like a good fit for them) when Dede Scozzafava abandoned the race at the last moment. (D)

NY-29: Strike two names from the list of potential Democratic candidates for the special election to replace crumb-bum Rep. Eric Massa. Assemblywoman Barbara Lifton has announced that she won't run for the seat, as has Monroe County DA Mike Green. (JL) On the GOP side, state Sen. Cathy Young has also just declined.

PA-12: Barbara Hafer continues to attack the manner in which former Murtha aide Mark Critz was selected as the Dem nominee for the May special election - and by extention the people behind the process. Several Dems have gone on record expressing their distaste for Hafer's attacks, and state party chair T. J. Rooney thinks they contributed to her being passed over. (D)

TN-03: Democrats seem to have found a willing candidate, finally, to fill the gap in the open seat in the R+13 3rd (which looked like a promising race while former Insurance Comm. Paula Flowers was in it). Brenda Short decided to take the plunge; she used to be a Hill aide long ago for former Rep. Marilyn Lloyd (whose 1994 retirement turned the seat over to Rep. Zach Wamp, who's finally vacating the seat to run for Governor).

OR-Treasurer, OR-04: In something of a surprise, Multnomah County Chair Ted Wheeler today got named as interim state Treasurer, in the wake of the unfortunate death of Ben Westlund. Wheeler will still need to run again in a special election to be held as part of the November 2010 ballot; he's confirmed he'll run in that election but will face at least two prominent Dems: retiring state Sen. Rick Metsger (well-known from his time as local sports anchor), who filed yesterday before Wheeler's appointment, and former Treasurer (and 2006 gubernatorial primary contestant) Jim Hill. Adding to the general sense of chaos is that it's the last day of filing in Oregon, meaning now people are piling into Wheeler's vacant seat as well. Finally, it looks like, with Springfield mayor Sid Leiken's departure, OR-04 Rep. Peter DeFazio will merely face Some Dude: home-schooling activist Art Robinson.

West Virginia: One other state where the filing deadline has passed is West Virginia. Despite the state's red-ward trend (and significant challenges to both its Dem Reps., Alan Mollohan and Nick Rahall), one area where the GOP doesn't look poised to make much of any progress is the state legislature, already thoroughly dominated by Democrats. In fact, if the Republicans won every race in the state Senate where they managed to field a candidate, they still would come up short on controlling the chamber. In the state House, they managed to leave 27 seats uncontested.  

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 3/9 (Afternoon Edition)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Correction
Story County is Ames in Iowa, not Davenport.  

Wow
I've been out-geography-geeked. Thanks.

[ Parent ]
I'm originally from Iowa...
As such, I have mixed feelings (unlike Desmoinesdem) about Vander Plaats doing well in the straw poll. I really worry the guy could beat Culver this year, although the political environment has changed a tad bit for the better.

But it would make me feel safer if Brandstad won the primary - he's not nearly as bad as Vander Plaats. (I'd never vote for either, but I don't know how much of a chance Culver has this year).  


[ Parent ]
I read
yesterday that Culver basically gave the middle finger to Iowa's largest health care provider in regards to hiking insurance premiums.  In a state like this, I can actually see this helping his anemic re-elects at a moment like this.  Also, everything I've read about Van Der Plaats kind of makes him seem like his fellow West Iowan Steve King who, if he ran statewide, would become roadkill with all the fun soundbites he's provided.  So, really...right now, shouldn't there a glimmer of hope for Culver at the moment?

[ Parent ]
I think BVP would get crushed east of I-35
which is where more than two-thirds of Iowans live. No one has really gone negative on him yet, and I don't think people will find him competent as a potential governor when they hear how he mismanaged his non-profit group in Sioux City.

But I do know a couple of people who agree with you and have told me, "be careful what you wish for."

Branstad just agreed to three debates before the GOP primary. We will see if that changes the dynamic at all.  


[ Parent ]
Pretty soon Lincoln will come full circle
and sign on to the Bennett letter.

But seriously, I cannot remember a politician flip-flopping as often and as obviously as Lincoln.


There's a more recent update to this story...
Where she apparently twittered that she is not backing off her opposition to reconciliation. Which somehow makes it even worse. (she get's no benefit for either supporting reconciliation or consistency).  

[ Parent ]
Sad
I think Halter is actually pulling her to the right instead of the left. It kind of defeats the purpose of having him.

36, Dem, IN-09

[ Parent ]
I think she is pulling herself in knots
Which has been her problem all along. Very sad.

[ Parent ]
Halter's purpose was not to pull Lincoln to the left.
It was to defeat her.  Pulling her to the left would be awesome, though.

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
If
Lincoln was smart she should have just not said anything from the start, keeping a low profile like Jim Webb and Evan Bayh did. I bet her polling would look better and Halter would have ran for the House seat.

36, Dem, IN-09

[ Parent ]
Yup
If she would just shut up, there would have only been attack ads September through Election Day.  But now she gets her name in the press everyday as well.

[ Parent ]
WV
The Republican Party in WV is indeed weak, Shelley Moore Capito's popularity notwithstanding. But considering how much many Democrats in the legislature vote like Republicans, well, I'm not sure that the party has much incentive to run people against a lot of those incumbents.

Sure a good bit of them are DINO'S yes,
But there are incentives for Republicans for getting people to run againist these Dems and win: getting one of your own in office. Sure these Dems vote like GOPers but at the end of the day there still Democrats.

22, Male, Democrat, PA-18.

[ Parent ]
Also
Also running Republicans against DINOs is how you get them to drop the D and change party.

That's happend a lot throughout the South. Not running against the DINOs keeps them Dems and keeps the Dems in control of WV.

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
PA-12 Hafer, Critz
Hafer appears to be an amateur-hour politician with no political instincts, based on that article. Interesting that folks who would've supported her backed away after her negative actions.

Assuming she runs against Critz in the primary which is all happening simultaneously, she really seems to have the potential to harm Critz in his special election race.
And Critz can't really make any fence-mending attempts.
Man, these two coinciding elections are a headache here.


Still would be fun to
have the 1990 primary results, just to see if she still lost parts of the district to Luksik.

While trying to find info on what city/county Hafer was from in 1990, I found that

1) Luksik was from Johnstown, in the district.
2) Hafer called Bob Casey Sr a "redneck Irishman", and amended it to "redneck". I wonder why she lost by such a margin. Hm.

Ok, found it, Elizabeth, PA was her residence in 1990 in Alleghany County. Which is in the 18th district now.

So the 1990 Hafer/Luksik map might be a bit ugly in the counties of the 12th. Just gotta e-mail the PA people sometime.

Hafer is probably a good contender for a Susan Bitter Smith.


[ Parent ]
You make me proud
But to clarify, simple negative campaigning against a primary opponent isn't enough for a Susan Bitter Smith Award.  That happens lots of times.  In order to qualify for a Susan Bitter Smith Award, you have to compound your negative campaigning with something vicious, hilarious, and transparently hypocritical.

Example: Doug Pike going negative on Trivedi for three months doesn't qualify him for a Susan Bitter Smith.  Subsequently demanding that Trivedi sign a positivity pledge does.

Little minds, meet your hobgoblin.


[ Parent ]
Hm
she's more likely to win a SBS if Critz loses an election as a result of her actions. Granted, she has already lost a big election and judging by her percentage, lost a lot of Republicans in the process of losing that election.

And the unofficial results in 1990 from CD12 counties

Allegheny: Hafer 27420, Luksik 26024
Armstrong: Hafer 2982, Luksik 2440
Cambria: Luksik 6651, Hafer 3319
Fayette: Hafer 1629, Luksik 1346
Greene: Hafer 925, Luksik 431
Indiana: Luksik 2479, Hafer 2374
Somerset: Luksik 3479, Hafer 2816
Washington: Hafer 3711, Luksik 2755
Westmoreland: Luksik 6811, Hafer 5990

hm, that's pretty lousy, even if you throw out Cambria.

I've mentioned that PA ballots have either the hometown or home county listed, right? because that has it's effects.


[ Parent ]
This
is her last chance to get elected to anything. She is in her late sixties and you can tell she will do anything to get this seat. It scares me, because she could go nuclear on him causing us to lose the seat. Hafer really has nothing to lose at this point.
 

36, Dem, IN-09

[ Parent ]
didn't have to be that way
But after her party flip in 2003, she announced and dropped out of the PA-SEN, LT-Gov and PA-18 races in 2005-06.

[ Parent ]
LA-03: Former Rep Chris John (from LA-07) Looking for Comeback?
That
would be cool, although I can't see him doing it though.  

36, Dem, IN-09

[ Parent ]
didn't read your post
but nice signature there hoosier.  I loled.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13

[ Parent ]
Thanks


36, Dem, IN-09

[ Parent ]
I like your sig too.


Check out the 2010 California races and help us take back Red California!

27, Indy, Female, TX-03


[ Parent ]
Thanks
I find it funny how you can make pretty much anything end in INO. You could fill a book that had clever INO endings from A-Z.  Sounds more like a fun diary.  

36, Dem, IN-09

[ Parent ]
In that spirit
Would that qualify Dan Coats as being a HINO ;)

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01


[ Parent ]
Yeah
Let's just hope he didn't sell that house in North Carolina just yet.  

36, Dem, IN-09

[ Parent ]
Now wait a minute!
It's not like North Carolina deserves Dan Coats!

39, male, NC-04

[ Parent ]
I thought Coats was an IINO
Indianan in name only....

[ Parent ]
Hoosier In Name Only ;) NT


Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01


[ Parent ]
HINO
is Hoosier in name only. Hoosier is more appropriate than Indianan (I feel weird just saying it).  

36, Dem, IN-09

[ Parent ]
Not sure if a guy who has spent the last five years as a lobbyist would be that great a candidate
But a decently regarded ex-Congressman would be better than nothing.

[ Parent ]
the LA03 seat is going to be redistricted away in 2012
that is why nobody is running for it. Basically, you are going to rent the seat for two years. Chris John should run for Lt. Governor or something else.  

[ Parent ]
would be slightly hard to do that
but LA3 might end up with Lafayette and Boustany. While LA-2 goes from New Orleans to Baton Rouge.

[ Parent ]
DE-Sen: Christine O'Donnell to (again) vie for GOP nod
Not that it probably matters, since even Delaware Republicans seem to loathe her.

http://www.delawareonline.com/...

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


I really hope the tea baggers get behind her
Wouldn't it be great?  Coons v O'Donnell?

Someone needs to infiltrate redstate and build up some grassroots for it. Hahah.

19, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)

Bill Hedrick(D) for CA-44


[ Parent ]
I'm not sure that a corporate state like Delaware
even has any "grassroots" to speak of in the first place.

[ Parent ]
Correct
Keep in mind, O'Donnell only garnered 17% in the '06 GOP primary, running to the far-right of airline pilot Michael Protack and the eventual winner, law professor Jan C. Tang. I don't think she's even that popular with the grassroots. Her core base seems to be young, female, Malkin-esque conservatives. Not enough to win in a Delaware primary.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
Melancon
Running on a petty campaign law violation when attacking David Vitter is like interviewing to be President of General Motors on the grounds that you would add cupholders.

I'm not even talking about the prostitution thing, either; formaldehyde is where Melancon could make up some ground.  But, alas, the Congressman seems incapable of running to the left on anything, and I don't see how he gets any traction.


Your first line is LOL funny
and true.

And I agree about the formaldehyde. Other things could be pointed out, too, like that he's been so busy fighting against Federal spending that he's been ineffective in getting good new levees built to protect the state from future monster hurricanes.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
LA
Vitter is more popular than ever here. I honestly see no way Melancon wins. DSCC money will be much better spent in the open seats and NC.  

[ Parent ]
I agree
I'm somewhat mystified why Louisiana voters like him so much, though. Now that his "family values" act is exposed as total hypocritical bullshit, is it purely because a majority of Louisiana voters are against Obama and so is he, or do they actually feel he's been effective in getting Federal dollars that are so needed in the state?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
MI-1
Stupak's getting a primary challenger: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo...

'bout time.  


Bad
Pro-choice won't play in the UP.  Not that I see Saltonsall getting much traction.

[ Parent ]
At this point
I would much rather a Republican win than Stupak. He has done more than any other member of the House to sabotage the Democratic agenda.

[ Parent ]
Is that a joke?
I hope so.

[ Parent ]
Unfortunately, there are PINOs
progressives in name only who would rather see pure wingnuts instead of socially conservative pro-labor politicians in power.

Stupak's 98% pro-AFL-CIO lifetime voting record (ref http://www.votesmart.org/issue... ) is not good enough for them.

aka, if they can't have it all, they'd rather see the country go to h--- in a hand basket.

We've seen PINOs here in the form of other users as well.  


[ Parent ]
Whatever.
Torpedoing the main Democratic agenda item and any chance of EFCA  isn't what I'd call pro-labor. But believe I'm whatever acronym you want.

[ Parent ]
Parallel universe I guess
Stupak has been a fine legislator for a long time, representing a postion well to the left of his district.  

Accusing him personally of being uber-influential in a negative way is just empty words, and at best off topic for this site.


[ Parent ]
I second that
A candidate is a representative of his/her district first and foremost, and must reflect it's views. If a district is, say, CA-8, then even Pelosi may be "slightly to the right" of it's "norm", but at least i will be 100% for Progressive there. If it's MI-1 - i will be 100% for Stupak (who reflects district wishes very well - there are lots of pro-life Democrats there). If it's AL-2 - i will be 100% for Bobby Bright, because Bright reflects district views and can win to boot, while "progressive" isn't on BOTH points...

[ Parent ]
In Marcs defense
The two other Lake Superior politicians who have districts much like Stupaks, Obertar of MN-8 and Obey of WI-7, aren't threatening to vote no and help torpedo the bill over abortion.

I dont know about Obey and if he is pro-life or pro-choice, but Obertar is pro-life, would really like to see the Stupak amendment put into the bill, but is being a team player and sucking it up so we can get something passed finally.

I dont necessarily want Stupak to lose, but I'd like for him to shut the hell up and quit giving us bad press.  If you want to vote no, then shut up and dont it.  You dont need a whole media parade about it.


[ Parent ]
I mostly agree
BTW Obey is usually considered "mixed" on choice...

[ Parent ]
Really?
Obama won Stupaks district I will have you know.

The Right and pretty much all pro-lifers have branded Obama as the abortion president for some reason, even though he has been in office a year and not lifted a finger for or against the issue in my view.

So, yeah, don't think a pro choicer can't win up there.

19, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)

Bill Hedrick(D) for CA-44


[ Parent ]
Yes, Obama won MI-01
But after the McCain campaign basically gave the entire state the finger by pulling out of it (and in a very public way).

This district is normally more Republican leaning and happens to be quite socially conservative (and many voted for Obama despite his support for abortion rights there, I'd imagine).

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01


[ Parent ]
Yeah, the economy trumped everything in 2008.
Social issues weren't even really on the radar in Michigan.

Plus, the challenger is from the Lower Peninsula, so she's a non-starter.  Yoopers vote for Yoopers, period.


[ Parent ]
Well. i would offer to everyone to forget
about Obama's results in 2008 in context of Elections-2010. In 2008 Obama was incorrectly considered something of a "savoir" in many parts of the country - a sort of "second incarnation" of MLK, if i dare to say. So he got anomalously high percentages in many parts of the country (there were, of course, areas, that rejected him even then, but there was considerably less of them). Especially - in Michigan (48% in MI-2, and 49% in MI-3), Indiana and some other states. That's, probably, one-time phenomena, that now (after everyone got to know that Obama is "a mere mortal") will not repeat itself for long time to go.

[ Parent ]
A pro-choice candidate could win
But probably not by winning on choice.

Don't get me wrong, I'd happily be shot of Stupak - and given his actions on healthcare, I'd have no problem with a Republican taking MI-01 for a term or two if we could line up somebody good to take it back - but choice will not be the issue that causes the district to dump Stupak.


[ Parent ]
She's not from the UP too
so that'll hurt. 317K of 662K people live there and so does Stupak. So she'd have to get past that and it would be tough.

[ Parent ]
Good.
It's way past time to hold Democrats accountable.

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
Well,
they are accountable before people of their districts and only before them. And it's good, IMHO.... If i would be a candidate i would loath to be considered "accountable" before anybody else: first of all - "ideological PACs"

[ Parent ]
It's a primary campaign
That's all about accountability before your district.

What exactly is your point?


[ Parent ]
My point?
Well, i tried to explain it as clearly as  i could. As i said - i don't give a damn about what "external" (be they liberal or conservative, pro-life or pro-choice, pro-gun, or pro gun control, pro-labor or pro business) organization says about given candidacy. The only criteria for me - how well he/she reflects the mood of his/her district. Pro-life and pro-gun Democrat is absolutely fine to me in most of the South and parts of Midwest, and i wouldn't root for "unelectable progressive" there only because he/she is a "progressive". But "progressive" is fine or me in liberal areas where he/she correctly reflects the mood of his constituency. Conservative Republican is natural for me as representative in most of the rural and exurban South or West, but it's foolish to run xuch candidate (by reasons of "ideology") in most of the North-East, big cities or in close suburbs of big cities. And so on. So - i hate an "ideological discipline" as long as there are only 2 big political parties in country (if there would be 5-6 of them with different political orientation - from hard-right to hard-left - another matter, because i would still have "a real choice" there). THAT was my point...

[ Parent ]
So, do you give the Republicans the same benefit?
Afterall, most of them are probably representing the beliefs of their constituents when they take destructive, moronic actions like opposing healthcare reform, plunging us into Iraq, ignoring climate change, and trying to add homophobic discrimination to the Constitution.

So, is it okay when they do it, too?  If not, then you are a hypocrite only concerned with party labels who believes it's okay if you're a Democrat.  And if so, then you have reduced politics to a digusting display of moral relativism where destructive, moronic, and downright wrong actions are beyond criticism because the incumbents are supposedly acting on the beliefs of their constituents.

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.


[ Parent ]
What's unclear to me
is if smoltchanov is saying:

1) Ds should nominate the most progessive candidate who can win in a district, with the emphasis on electability.
2) Every district should elect the representative who most closely reflects the beliefs of those voters, whether they be Ds or Rs.

Personally, I'm closer to option 1), with slight bit more of a focus on progressivism. (I most appreciate strong progressives who win big in swing districts / states.)

I recognize that some "true blue" progressives aren't happy with people who are of option 1) or 2) .


[ Parent ]
Both
I will not blame conservative district merely for the fact that it prefers to elect a conservative Republican - that's, absolutely, the right of people of this district. If they  want to be represented by, say, Lamborn (as majority of people in CO-05 probably does) - i will not "read them a lesson" of "how dare you, idiots?????" type.

And yes, i put electability first, and ideology - well, not even second. In my opinion - both parties (remember - i am not a Democrat, but centrist Independent, who is free to choose from the "whole assortment" of candidates every celection, and, while most often that turns to be Democratic candidate - that's not always so - i happenned to support Republicans, Greens, Libertarians, and, of course, Independents) should run candidates, who have "maximum degree of electability". So, when i speak about Democrats my preferred candidate would be someone like Pelosi (may be - even slightly more liberal) in CA-08, AND, at the same time -  Bobby Bright in AL-02. Because they both reflect their district's views and they both can win. Conservative republican is a natural candidate for me in TX-13 or AL-06, and, as i said - i will not blame district voters for supporting such candidate. But equally conservative Republican candidate in, say, CT-04 or even MA-10 is sheer and pure idiocy to me..

Hope it's all clear now...


[ Parent ]
Yes, it's ok too when they do it
It's their belief, and while i may strongly disagree with that beliefs - i will respect their will. You can accuse me of "moral relativism", but at least i will not be blamed by anyone  to be "blind ideologue", which is MUCH more important to me...

[ Parent ]
Blind ideologue?
God forbid someone actually have a core set of beliefs on important issues and want them acted upon.  God forbid someone take issue with politicians wanting to strip away their rights, destroy their environment, get them into wars, etc.

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
You are as entitled to YOUR
beliefs as I am to MINE, don't we?

[ Parent ]
NY-29
I'm feeling good about both Susan John and David Koon. Both have great records of public service, and have voting patterns that speak for themselves

http://www.votesmart.org/issue...

http://www.votesmart.org/issue...

Oh, and they both, like Massa, support single payer

http://www.rochestercitynewspa...

I hope one of them is picked.


I guess it'd be nice to have someone like Massa
except more supportive of health care reform and less inclined to grope male aides.

20, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)

[ Parent ]
Check it out
Massa on Glen Beck's show. Gosh can't we get him to shut up?

http://politicalwire.com/archi...

36, Dem, IN-09


I actually found it quite amusing
Glenn Beck actually had to apologize to his audience for wasting an hour of their lives (he's wasted a lot more than that over the years, but that's a different story ;))

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01


[ Parent ]
Bad News
Granny D has passed away at age 100. She was the democratic nominee for Senate in 2004 against Judd Gregg. Before that she was known for walking across the country to champion the McCain-Feingold act. I was on a vacation in DC at the time and I got to meet her, and walk the last mile with her. RIP

36, Dem, IN-09

RIP


Check out the 2010 California races and help us take back Red California!

27, Indy, Female, TX-03


[ Parent ]
Oh no! :-(
What a wonderful lady. And, a surprisingly talented politician on the campaign trail too; she managed to fire up grassroots liberals enough to keep Judd Gregg from coasting away with an 80%+ victory.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

SSP Supports Scott McAdams

Scott McAdams for Senate

Goal Thermometer

Help Us Reach Our Goal!

Donate Today


Follow Us

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

SSP Race Ratings

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox