Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 12/17

by: Crisitunity

Thu Dec 17, 2009 at 2:00 PM EST


AR-Sen: Blanche Lincoln seems like she'll take a lifeline from anyone who'll throw her one these days, and she got a big one today -- although it's not a surprise who's doing it. The nation's most famous Arkansan, Bill Clinton, authored a fundraising e-mail on Lincoln's behalf.

CA-Sen: The war of words between Chuck DeVore and the NRSC keeps flaring up; DeVore keeps claiming the NRSC won't meet with him. DeVore's camp claims they got an offer to meet with the NRSC's executive director rather than John Cornyn, which he turned down... but that came after e-mailing the NRSC once and then faxing them follow-ups twice. I must admit I share in the incredulity of NRSC spokesbot Brian Walsh, who said "Remarkably, every [other of the 60 GOP candidates who've met with the NRSC] knew how to set up a meeting with the exception of Chuck DeVore who apparently believed sending a fax to Senator Cornyn's official government office was the most direct route. That alone might demonstrate a lack of seriousness, or at least raise questions of competency, by a statewide Senate campaign." The Hill's Aaron Blake looks at this brouhaha in the context of GOP outsider campaigns in general, with a subtext wondering if DeVore's camp is intentionally miscommunicating as a means of burnishing outsider credentials (seeing as how the way to lose your Seal of Good Teabagging is by becoming one of the NRSC's golden children).

FL-Sen: Those Rasmussen numbers on the Florida Senate general election finally showed up. Like last time, and contrary to conventional wisdom, they actually show Marco Rubio overperforming Charlie Crist, vis a vis Kendrick Meek. Rubio beats Meek 49-35, while Crist beats Meek 42-36. Seems strange, but Florida pundit Mike Thomas speculates that Crist is losing ground not among conservatives (whom he never really had to begin with) but rather among indies and moderates, simply by virtue of his empty-suit opportunism, which might explain why the blank-slate Rubio is overperforming. Meanwhile, Rubio keeps trucking along on the fundraising front, as the Club for Growth has bundled $100K in contributions for him in the last month.

CT-Sen: CQ highlights one more way that price is no object for Linda McMahon; she's paying her campaign manager David Cappiello a $280K salary, which is at least double what the Rob Simmons and Chris Dodd managers make. Who's the lucky guy? It's former state Sen. David Cappiello. If that name sounds familiar, he's the guy who got spanked by 20 points by then-freshman Rep. Chris Murphy in CT-05 last year... which I'd think might be a bit of a red flag if you were a savvy businessperson looking to hire someone based on campaign skills.

NH-Sen: The fault lines are remarkably clear in the Republican primary in New Hampshire. GOP establishment candidate Kelly Ayotte was busy hitting a $1,000 per individual Washington DC fundraiser sponsored by telecommunications lobbyists yesterday, at around the same time conservative primary challenger Ovide Lamontagne was getting the endorsement of radio talk show host and Coulter-wannabe Laura Ingraham.

CA-Gov (pdf): The Public Policy Institute of California has a full poll of the California gubernatorial race (they've previously polled on approval ratings, but not the horserace). They see a race between Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman that's a little tighter (43-37 for Brown) than most pollsters have seen (although, of course, better than Rasmussen's 41-41 tie). Brown makes short work of his other Republican opposition, Tom Campbell (46-34) and Steve Poizner (47-31). Whitman also has an edge in the GOP primary, at 32 with 12 for Campbell (who's mulled moving over to the Senate race) and 8 for Poizner.

GA-Gov: Rasmussen has numbers for the Republican gubernatorial primary (sorry, no numbers for the general, which I don't think has ever been polled). This race looks pretty stable: they find Insurance Comm. John Oxendine with a sizable lead, as usual. He's at 28, doubling up on SoS Karen Handel at 14. Rep. Nathan Deal is at 13, followed by Jeff Chapman, Eric Johnson, Ray McBerry, and Austin Scott, all at 2. I wonder if this might tarnish Oxendine a little, though: it was just revealed that he took a trip to the 2007 Oscars on the tab of a major campaign contributor who was also asking, at the time, for Oxendine's intervention in an insurance dispute against Blue Cross/Blue Shield.

MI-Gov: Democratic Lt. Gov. John Cherry has been lagging his Republican opponents in the polls lately, and a new poll from EPIC-MRA shows why: no one knows who the heck he is, and those who do don't like him. Cherry is unknown to 39%, which is greater than any of his main Republican opponents. AG Mike Cox, for instance, has an unknown of 16%. (The release doesn't mention any head-to-head numbers, at least not yet.)

NE-Gov: The Democrats may actually get a good-sounding recruit in the Nebraska gubernatorial race? That probably doesn't change Republican incumbent Dave Heineman's "Safe R" status, but it's still good news. Mike Boyle (who says he's "considering" the race) was mayor of Omaha from 1981 until a recall in 1987; he's currently in his third term as a Douglas County Commissioner. Boyle also ran for governor in 1990, losing the Democratic primary to now-Sen. Ben Nelson.

OR-Gov: Former NBA player Chris Dudley officially embarked on his question to become the nation's tallest governor, announcing his candidacy in a speech that didn't give potential supporters much to judge where on the Republican spectrum he falls, other than the usual boilerplate on jobs and taxes. (He did mention in an interview, on the abortion issue, that he was "comfortable with [abortion laws] where they are now.") At least he won't have to deal with state House minority leader Bruce Hanna in the primary, who yesterday turned down conservative entreaties to get into the race.

SD-Gov: PPP threw in some gubernatorial questions in its SD-AL poll, and it looks like Republicans have a generic edge here that should keep the state house in their hands, despite nobody knowing much of anything about any of the candidates. The good news for Dems is that their candidate, state Senate minority leader Scott Heidepreim, is better known than any of the GOPers (although 57% have no opinion of him). The bad news is that Heidepreim still loses to all four GOPers, even Some Dude Ken Knuppe (although only 32-30). He also loses to Lt. Gov. Dennis Daugaard 42-29, Senate majority leader Dave Knudson 39-29, and Brookings mayor Scott Munsterman 35-30.

KS-03: Dems look to be getting closer to having a solid candidate for the open seat race in the 3rd. Kansas City, Kansas mayor Joe Reardon says he's giving it "serious consideration," and his mayoral predecessor, Carol Marinovich also said she's not ruling out a run. Hopefully only one will run, at least giving the Dems smooth sailing into what's likely to be a difficult general election.

PA-11: The NRCC has to be pleased with Hazleton mayor Lou Barletta's recently-announced third whack at vulnerable Rep. Paul Kanjorski in the 11th, and they just added him to their "Young Guns" program. He still starts on their lowest tier for now, though ("On the Radar").

PA-12: Septuagenarian Rep. John Murtha, who was briefly hospitalized this week for gall bladder trouble, is saying via his spokesperson that he has no intent to retire and will run again in 2010. This comes despite leaks of a memo written in October to the DCCC asking for legal advice on how to deal with his reelection funds if he decides to retire. (The request apparently originated with a constituent's question.)

Blue Dogs: The Blue Dogs added three new members yesterday: Scott Murphy (who I thought had been a member all along), Betsy Markey (not a surprise, given her tough district, although she's taken some courageous votes like cap-and-trade), and Kurt Schrader. The decision by Schrader -- who's near the middle of the Dem caucus, in a slightly Dem-leaning district, and usually a good vote although a bit of a budget hawk -- may raise a few eyebrows, but Blue Oregon's Kari Chisholm offers a good defense of him.

Texas: Lots to talk about as Democrats try to assemble a full slate of candidates to go with top gubernatorial recruit Bill White. Most notably, they have a former AFL-CIO executive VP interested in running for the all-important (in Texas, at least) Lt. Gov. spot: Linda Chavez-Thompson. They have another candidate interested in running for Comptroller (which ex-Rep. Nick Lampson has also scoped out): former Republican comptroller and then independent gubernatorial candidate Carole Strayhorn, who says she wants to run as a Dem this time. Finally, people are wondering whether Kinky Friedman even qualifies to run for Agriculture Commissioner. State statute requires actual agricultural experience, and Friedman is claiming that a ranch he owns with relatives has enough cattle on it for him to qualify.

Pennsylvania: The Hill points to an interesting academic research paper that examined what's going on with people who've participated in the widespread Republican-to-Democrat party switch that's remade politics in suburban Pennsylvania in recent years. As one might expect, these are affluent people for the most part (with one-third making more than $80K). Unexpectedly, though, only 53% say they were driven out by "extremism" in the GOP's positions, and they span the ideological spectrum (although with a plurality calling themselves "moderates"). Many, in fact, (over 40%) were at one point Democrats who had switched to the GOP and were now switching back.

Votes: Yesterday's House vote to lift the debt ceiling was another closely orchestrated one, passing 218-214. As might be expected, most of the most vulnerable members voted no... and also a few center-left types running for Senate who don't want to get tarred with the 'debt' brush (Kendrick Meek, Paul Hodes). They were generously given some cover by three of the retiring Blue Dogs -- Dennis Moore, John Tanner, and Bart Gordon -- who all voted 'yes,' since their seats in the lifeboat weren't needed (same with some of the other Blue Dogs facing lesser challenges this year, like Jim Marshall and John Barrow).

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 12/17
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

GA-Gov
The Oscars? Seriously?

And to think this same clown was behind that goofy 'King Roy the Rat vs. the Ox' ad.

Male, 23, DC-At Large


I actually feel pretty good about Georgia.
The Republican gubernatorial field is a clown car primary that looks likely to go to a runoff (and therefore, a potentially bloodied winner with less money) while we should probably get through with at least an uncompetitive runoff, and hopefully not even that.  It would be nice to have, say Oxendine and Handel sniping at each other for months while Barnes can run a positive campaign into August.

The Richardson situation hasn't helped them.  Hopefully, the question of ethics can give us some headway, both politically and in policy (because we need major reforms, e.g. not allowing companies to donate directly to candidates).


Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.


I've argued for some time now
that we have a great shot at winning Georgia.  From what I've gathered, Barnes was actually a decent Governor who made the mistake of stepping on a couple of political landmines (fighting the teacher's union, changing the state flag) and running for re-election in 2002 when almost every southern Democratic gubernatorial candidate went down (Phil Bredesen notwithstanding).  He already has a built-in message of "things were much better when I was running the show" and the likely GOP nominee Oxendine seems to have lots of baggage from his ties to the industry he was elected to regulate.  It would be a huge coup if we could nab Georgia and South Carolina in 2010 - not only would it offset our losses elsewhere, but we could have a hand in some crucial redistricting battles.

[ Parent ]
Blue Dog Progressive Rankings
http://mandatemedia.typepad.co...

Some are bluer than others... and then some are more blue...


So
The worst score for any Blue Dog is 41% and the best score for any republican is 22%.

Of our retirements thus far their rankings (out of 435)

Arthur Davis  186/435
Kendrick Meek  116/435
Neil Abercrombie  152/435
Dennis Moore  200/435
Charlie Melancon  223/435
Paul Hodes  74/435
Joe Sestak  76/435
Bart Gordon  242/435
John Tanner  250/435
Brian Baird  176/435


[ Parent ]
Progressive Punch is a bogus indicator
I would look at big votes:

Stimulus
Budget
Cap-n-trade
Health care
Financial regulation
Jobs Bill

To this, I might add some amendments to these bills to allow for those who did purity votes to be counted as a progressive vote.

That would be a much better indication of whose with as and against us.


[ Parent ]
They do have a measurement for "important votes"
But ya, Progressive Punch needs some work on their formulas.

[ Parent ]
Why is "Progressive Punch" Bogus
and why do people so want to "reinvent the wheel" w/r/t ratings?

(btw, if you look deeper, "Progressive Punch" sorts by this year, lifetime, overall votes, and so-called 'big votes')


[ Parent ]
Too many votes on House procedure
which tend to be much more party-line.  

[ Parent ]
"Fillibuster" isa procedural vote
and Progressive Punch has their "big vote" ratings, which I assume exclude such.

[ Parent ]
Technically
unfortunately due to the way that the Senate is run these days, it also tells how you vote on legislation.

Those like Bright and Griffith are indistinguishable from Republicans on the big items.  I think even Minnick voted for one of the bills.


[ Parent ]
Just looked at Progressive Punch house votes in some detail
and based on a couple of categories very few of their votes (maybe 15-20%) are procedure related.

Nevertheless, even with procedural votes, the relative rankings still matter. Have you even looked at any detail w/r/t Progressive Punch, especially their "big vote" categories? I don't see procedural votes there, but that's just from a quick scan.

And your "big issues" are not everyone's big issues.


[ Parent ]
Well I do believe
that Mike Thompson did vote for all those pieces of legislation

Male 21 Dem Ca's 1st  

[ Parent ]
NE-Gov
What were the circumstances of Mike Boyle's recall? Aren't recalls usually suffered by extremely unpopular politicians? Why is he, then, a credible candidate for anything? What am I missing here? Is Douglas County Commissioner an elective office? In that case, how did he recover from being recalled? I hope one of you knows.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


Abuse of Power
Apparently, he and his police department (and a few other agencies) were at odds.  I'm not sure how to post the article by embedding it.  But, here's the link: http://www.nytimes.com/1987/01...

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
That article makes him look bad
There's no doubt his opponents will use that against him. I can just imagine the Republican take on it: "Even the liberal New York Times wrote this about Mike Boyle..."

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
He can hardly do worse than Heineman's 2006 opponent
[ Parent ]
Wow!
n/t

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Bad, yes
But Douglas County Commissioner IS an elected office. The county (essentially coterminous with Omaha) is divided into seven districts and each has a commissioner.  Districts 1,3,5, and 7 were up in 2008.  Boyle represents District 1, which is the far southeastern corner of the county.  I've heard...I think, anyway...that this is the most minority and Dem friendly part of the area, yes?

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
Well this isn't that surprising
Many, in fact, (over 40%) were at one point Democrats who had switched to the GOP and were now switching back.

Looks like the state's senior Senator just did what many of his constituents have been doing for years.


Great study
That was an excellent study, wasn't it? Poli-sci kids, take note.

This is the link more directly to the study results: http://surveypractice.org/2009...

TheHill.com's article (linked in the digest above) is an okay summary, but misleading on a few counts, like:

The fact that there are so many floating partisans again undermines the broad notion that Republicans are driving hordes of life-loyal members from their ranks.

Yet the study is pretty explicit on this. Fully 53% of the sample had been Republicans for at least 20 years and 76% claimed to have never been registered with another party. The study basically directly contradicts this assertion, saying:

Another notable characteristic of individuals leaving the Republican Party is that a large majority have been life long Republicans.  Over 3 out of 4 GOP defectors indicated that they had never changed their party registration before their recent leap to the Democratic Party. Conversely, just over 1 in 5 Republican Party defectors had switched party registration status at least once before.  The results also indicate that a majority (53%) of individuals leaving the party have been in the GOP for at least twenty years.

Plus, they have a chart: http://surveypractice.files.wo...

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
Penn study
Only 53% lol - even if that isn't misleading in the study 53% of people in this country wouldn't agree on leaving a movie if someone shouted "fire" - that's downright damning and this is from a left-leaning independent.  Pugs will never get my vote perhaps conservative candidates but never anyone who has ever shared even a podium with bachmann and her ilk.

PA-Sen: Specter up 23 over Sestak; Toomey tied or ahead
Probably will be tight
But once there is a firm nominee working to unite the party and training their sights on Toomey then I think this will be fine. Promising sign that Obama still has net positive approval. I view PA in the same light as IL - lose either and the GOP will be netting at least five senate seats, probably more.

[ Parent ]
DCCC outraised NRCC by more than $1m in November
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/ey...

Still not seeing the Republican surge we should be if a wave is forming. Dems with 3-1 CoH advantage.



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox