Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 11/13

by: Crisitunity

Fri Nov 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM EST


FL-Sen: Here's a big score for Marco Rubio, who's quickly cementing himself as darling for the conservative movement. He got the keynote address at CPAC's 2010 gathering, the conservative movement's version of Lollapalooza. Charlie Crist's response? Re-flip-flop on the stimulus! Today he said it was "pretty clear" he did support it at the time. The civil war in Florida is also resulting in a larger spotlight being shone on state party chair (and key Crist ally) Jim Greer, who's the subject of an interesting (and very critical) Miami Herald piece.

KY-Sen: A strange kerfuffle erupted in the GOP primary in Kentucky, when Rand Paul earlier this week declined to promise to support Mitch McConnell for minority leader in the face of a hypothetical leadership challenge by Jim DeMint. Paul's rival, SoS Trey Grayson, pledged fealty to McConnell and attacked Paul for being more beholden to his "Libertarian donor base" than his fellow Kentuckians. Then, yesterday, Paul met privately with McConnell in Louisville, and after having had his brain implant installed a productive conversation, emerged filled with praise for McConnell and saying he had "no reason not to support him."

MA-Sen (pdf): Another poll from local pollsters Suffolk give a big lead to AG Martha Coakley, who's pulling in 44% of the Democratic primary vote. She's trailed by Stephen Pagliuca at 17, Rep. Michael Capuano at 16, and Alan Khazei at 3. (Coakley was at 47 and Capuano at 9 in September according to Suffolk.) Also, there appears to be one route to victory for Republican state Sen. Scott Brown: make sure that Alan Khazei somehow wins the primary. Brown beats Khazei 33-30, while losing 58-27 to Coakley, 48-29 to Capuano, and 49-27 to Pagliuca. (Brown leads perennial candidate Jack E. Robinson 45-7 in the GOP primary.)

Meanwhile, Capuano got another endorsement from among the ranks of his House colleagues, this one pretty high-profile: Nancy Pelosi. Pagliuca, on the other hand, is trying to dig out of his self-created hole, when he "misunderstood" a debate question and said that he supports reinstating a military draft.

AL-Gov: Agriculture Commissioner Ron Sparks seems to have hit on an issue that differentiates him from Rep. Artur Davis in their Democratic gubernatorial primary fight: health care reform. Davis voted against it (seemingly earning him the sudden enmity of the entire netroots), and now Sparks has been loudly touting the public option, as he did at an appearance before the Madison County Democratic Women yesterday.

CO-Gov: State Senate minority leader Josh Penry thumbed his nose rather unsubtly at ex-Rep. Scott McInnis as he departed the governor's primary race, saying in a recent interview that not only was he not endorsing McInnis, but also that he still felt that he would be the better candidate. Is he heading for a Tom Tancredo endorsement instead? (After all, Tancredo did a lot to boost Penry's campaign.) We can only hope.

IL-Gov: State GOP chair (and would-be Mark Kirk antagonist) Andy McKenna got a substantial boost in his quest for the GOP gubernatorial nomination. He got the endorsement of Tom Cross, the state House minority leader.

MD-Gov: Republican ex-Gov. Bob Ehrlich seems to be giving more weight to the idea of a rematch against Martin O'Malley, if recent comments to the press are any indication. The Republican gubernatorial victories in Virginia and New Jersey may be giving him some added incentive.

TX-Gov: A new Rasmussen poll finds Gov. Rick Perry opening up a big lead over Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison in the Republican gubernatorial primary: 45-36, with 4% to Paulist Debra Medina. This is a big reversal from September's Rasmussen poll, which gave KBH a 40-38 edge. Hutchison is still racing to the right, as she said that she'd be likely to try to opt out of the public option as governor, but Perry is leading that race too, cheerfully let us know that Barack Obama is "hell-bent on taking America towards a socialist country."

DE-AL: State Rep. Greg Lavelle, one of the names dropped by Rep. Mike Castle as suggestions for a successor, said that he won't take on the uphill task of trying to hold Castle's seat. Businessman Fred Cullis is the only Republican running so far.

NC-11: Rep. Heath Shuler's role in a 2007 land swap has the potential to hurt him next year. The Tennessee Valley Authority's inspector general cleared him of wrongdoing in the matter (as did the House Ethics committee), but the TVA is saying that Shuler wasn't honest to the press about it, when he said that there hadn't been any contact between himself and the TVA.

NY-23: Although there's nothing to suggest that Doug Hoffman is in a place where he can catch up to Bill Owens, it'll still be a while till the election can be certified -- possibly not till early next month. (Unfortunately, this means putting off the final results of our predictions contest from last week! We'll keep you posted.)

SC-04: Republican Rep. Bob Inglis keeps backing away from his party's right wing (and probably away from his job, in his dark-red district). He said that he can't "identify" with what we called the "hard right." Interestingly, he still identifies as "religious right," but seems to counterpose that against the teabaggers' movement, also saying: "As a religious right guy, I'm thinking there was a guy named Jesus who had some things to say about these kinds of concepts. And I don't want to live in a society that lets a few test cases die on the steps of the hospital. I can't go there."

VA-St. Sen.: The Democrats still control the Virginia state Senate (thanks to none of its seats being in the balance in the election last week), but it's a fragile 21-19 edge. Especially troublesome: 83-year-old Charles Colgan only reluctantly ran for reelection in 2007, Ralph Northam considered flipping to the Republicans earlier this year, and now Bob McDonnell seems interested in taking a page from Steve Beshear and Eliot Spitzer by appointing Senate Dems to cushy jobs in his administration. On the plus side, though, there are two special elections coming up, to replace Republicans who were elected to other positions last week. The seat of Ken Stolle (new Virginia Beach sheriff) is pretty Republican-leaning, but new AG Ken Cuccinelli's seat in Democratic-leaning Fairfax County is a potential pickup.

Redistricting: This is interesting; Republicans keep pushing to make redistricting fairer in Indiana, despite that they'll control the process coming out of the next census. SoS Todd Rokita has already pushed for laws to make it a more neutral process, and now state Senate President Pro Tem David Long is pushing for an independent commission to draw legislative boundaries.

Votes: Here's a first: Republicans actually regretting doing something wrong. They're privately saying that they "failed to anticipate" the political consequences of a no vote on the Franken amendment, that leaves them exposed to charges of insensitivity to rape victims and hands ammo to Democrats. (Well, maybe that's more regretting getting caught, rather than regretting doing something wrong...)

OFA: Organizing for America is firing up the Batsignal, summoning volunteers on the ground in 32 districts that were won by Obama but are held by House Republicans. The plan is for the volunteers to visit the Reps' offices and demand support for health care reform.

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 11/13
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Virginia Correction
Ralph Northam was the senator who thought about switching. Colgan is the one who (apparently) reluctantly ran for re-election in 2007.

Thanks
I blame Josh Goodman and his weird comma placement.

[ Parent ]
It was Northam...
But I wouldn't lose any sleep over him switching parties. He's a loyal Dem and very close to Sen. Deeds who will still be in the Senate to watch him.

That said, I'm terrified about Houck. He's the one floating the idea, not McDonnell, which means that he's very interested and McDonnell would be an idiot not to send an offer. That district is VERY Republican.

The special election in Fairfax will determine control, and I would give Republicans the edge until we see how this race pans out.


[ Parent ]
About that Franken amendment
Thers at Whiskey Fire summed it up for me

http://whiskeyfire.typepad.com...

Now why is Hutchison crashing so hard in the polls? Anti-Washington (but not anti-incumebent) sentiment, and is it because she hasn't resigned or because she keeps threatening it?


I think Perry has just done a great job
Hugging the right.

[ Parent ]
Rick Perry was DOA until Obama's election
with conservatives riled up and feeling crazy, Perry was able to tap into something that Hutchison (used to coasting on mainstream Republican voters) can't and doesn't even seem to understand.  Hutchison says she would seek to opt out of the healthcare plan, Perry says Obama is taking us to socialism.  Which do you think gets conservatives going more?  Rick Perry has found his niche, appealing to the wingnuttiest of the wingnutty.

[ Parent ]
The question is
will Perry go crazy enough for crazy Texas to elected a Democrat?

[ Parent ]
Depends on which Democrat


[ Parent ]
A few comments
Schuler: You voted to betray the people by leaving health insurance status quo. I won't cry if you go down. Look at Inglis for an example of someone who has the courage to take some ethical stands when it's likely to hurt him at the polls. I still think if Inglis loses, he may be appointed by President Obama to some position. Where is his biggest area of expertise?

Kudos to Indiana Republicans for acting for fairness in redistricting. No kudos to Congressional Republicans for second thoughts on supporting rape. You suck!

TX: Is that state totally batshit insane? What is wrong with Texas?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


Yes
In a lot of ways, we are totally batshit insane (in what other state can a gubernatorial appointment be defeated because the nominee can't tell the difference between a duck and whooping crane).  That's why I've been pissed at Oklahoma recently thinking they can out-crazy us with Senators Inhofe and Coburn. And those crazy Republicans in the State House (gays are a greater threat than terrorism).

Tongue planted firmly in cheek.


[ Parent ]
And
And who can forget about the state legislator who got his cousin or brother to shoot him in the arm so he could get re-elected.

[ Parent ]
Heath Shuler didn't betray anybody, he represented his district
I don't remember Shuler running on a platform of supporting government health care.

If the GOP picks up 20-30 seats, you puritans are going to find out how much you miss those Blue Dogs.      

I live in Inglis' district, and will vote for him.  He has earned it. But I don't see him getting a WH appointment, if he loses. Besides, Inglis also voted AGAINST healthcare.  Your logic doesn't follow in my book.    


[ Parent ]
Inglis's comment was about Emergency Services
Some on the right, apparently, support ending the requirement that Emergency Rooms treat anyone who walk in and he was arguing against that.

28, Unenrolled, MA-08

[ Parent ]
I hope it's OK for me to post, merely in analysis
that Inglis is starting from a position and in a party that's much further to the right. No further comment, except that I do not damn all Blue Dogs and never have. I will respectfully decline to reply further in this sub-thread, so as not to run afoul of site policy.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Your Shuler comment
is outside the bounds of discussion for this site. We have always stressed that SSP is not the place for issues venting; this should have been clear to you after the events in other threads earlier this week.

[ Parent ]
I respectfully disagree.
There have been many comments about 'purity purging' the blue dogs, or not defending them with DCCC/DSCC funds.  If Shuler ran on Healthcare, it is news to me, and I live in that TV market.

I do not know which threads you are referring to, I don't always have the time to read every comment, but I read most, and did not see any recent warnings.

Admitedly, I did not read most of the Healthcare vote thread.  It just got too long by the time I saw it.


[ Parent ]
Here is one in a thread on the House healthcare vote, which easily racked up over 300 comments.
http://www.swingstateproject.c...

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Sorry, I'm not clear on where the bounds are
I'm not planning to have arguments about policy but didn't realize I'm not allowed to make this kind of statement. There have previously been much harsher statements, such as from someone that he would vote for Stalin if he were running against Griffith. I don't want to run afoul of any rules, but it really isn't fully clear to me just where the boundaries are, and I did not realize I was doing anything wrong.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
I'll add that I'll try my best to be more circumspect in the future
and do understand the reasons for the rules on policy debates.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Can we have a front-page clarification?
SSP is welcome to Republicans who are willing to argue in a civilised manner, so why is it verboten not to mourn the loss of a Democrat?

I realise that you don't want the community to fracture on ideological lines, and that you don't want to make this site about policy, but the point of the politics is to push forward policy, so they can't be separated absolutely. Saying that somebody doesn't represent your policy outcomes enough for you to want them to be re-elected should surely be within the line, but it appears not to be if you identify with their party.

So can we have some front-page clarification, of a more specific kind? Examples of acceptable and unacceptable references to issues would help. Otherwise you will get constantly get people stepping over the edge, as more and more Democratic legislation is going through congress and vote counting is as important as ever.

I haven't posted here much recently due to lack of time, but I'm afraid the current amorphous rules just make me less eager to return properly.


[ Parent ]
Let me make this a lot clearer
The Shuler comment was off-topic. This thread was about his TVA dealings, not the healthcare vote. If every time Heath Shuler's name comes up, people start griping about all the controversial votes of his they don't like, we'll see endless derails.

Yeah, we know there will be some griping from time to time about various dudes. I don't want to suggest that complaints are completely off-limits. But digging open fresh wounds when it's entirely off-topic is not helpful.


[ Parent ]
Thanks
That is a lot clearer. I'll try my best to stay on topic.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
OK, that clarifies
 

[ Parent ]
What's the matter with Texas!
Too many Republican straight-ticket voters! Many of whom believe Governor 39%'s lies, such as "conservatism" being the reason so many Texas cities are in the latest jobs report from Michael "Junk Bond King" Milken.

Hmmm. Looks like Florida didn't get the memo! (Lee and Collier are no "liberal" strongholds either, with Lee going for McCain by 10 and Collier going for McCain by over 20, according to the Atlas.)

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
A state senator
left to become sheriff?

I'd expect
that sheriff pays a whole lot better than being a part-time legislator.

[ Parent ]
Yes, for one reason: money.
Stolle will serve one term as Sheriff in order to get a big fat state pension, which is determined by the highest salary made over a three-year period. Virginia Beach Sheriff is a 6-figure job, while the State Senate pays $17k a year.

[ Parent ]
He loses the commute to Richmond, too.


[ Parent ]
Only 17k a year?
I know the legislative session in Virginia only lasts a few months, but gees how could anyone make a living off that?

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
They can't
which is why the legislature is filled with lawyers, business owners, and retirees. Regular people can't leave their jobs for the first three months of the year, and certainly can't live off of that amount of money.

[ Parent ]
Rubio on a roll ...
... my comment a few weeks ago that Crist had at best a 45% chance of being the GOP nominee, is looking more secure by the day. In fact 40% might be more like it now.  

The 'naked emperor' metaphor fits Crist very well at this moment.  

If Rubio 'brings it home' at that conference, and there is no reason to think he can't, expect to hear more commentary that he is the long sought-after 'heir apparent' to Ronald Reagan. He has the kind of charisma that few politician do.

Kay Bay needs to go ahead and resign soon, the trend is not good.  


Kos is polling FL-Sen
With Crist as a Democrat and as an indie. Should be interesting.

[ Parent ]
Early on
I expected Crist to win the primary with something like 80% of the vote.  Then I revised it to 70.  Then 60.  Now, I'm not sure if he can beat Rubio by double digits.

[ Parent ]
AL-Gov
This is turning into the most interesting Dem primary this side of Colorado. The white Ag Commissioner running to the left of the black Congressman representing one of the safest, most liberal districts in the country....who'd a thunk it?

Not sure how I feel about this one either. I don't think Davis can get past white voters and win the general, though I think Sparks has a shot. But even nominating Davis would be a breakthrough and I think Davis could end up boosting black turnout enough to save some of the downballot folks like Bobby Bright and maybe take down Republican Mike Rogers (of course, if Obama couldn't do that, who knows...).  

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


Don't bet on it...
If Sparks runs to Davis left, he'd have to run as a anti-incumbent/establishment populist in the general otherwise he'd fare no better. Davis being the nominee really won't mean much of a "break through" since the AL Dem party (as well as the MS Dems) have nominated blacks to statewide office (most recently Vivian Figures (a really pretty chic per her photos) and Eric Fleming; both state legislators). Both Figures and Fleming barely cracked 40%, about the state's population of blacks. Davis might do better, but I doubt he'd crack 45%...why? Cos unlike Harold Ford who pretty much started his career as a center right DLC dem (whatever that is worth these days), Davis ran to the left of Earl Hillard (who was pretty much a liberal except on guns) and only discovered his inner DLC-ness in 2008-9 (just like Evan Bayh discovered his progressiveness in 2006 and 2007 only to revert to his true DLC self after ending his non-existent campaign for president and failing to become Obama's Veep). Davis pre-2009 record will be easy pickings in a statewide race where Obama is as unpopular as the Crimson Tide is in Georgia or Tennesse. He's pissed off the left on the most significant democratic legislation in Obama's term and no one on the right trusts him, thus a recipe for a doomed campaign.  

Indepedent/Lean D. Dude.
All 5s (now TX-5; frmly VA-5 and CA-5)  


[ Parent ]
I don't think
the Davis/Hilliard part is right: in the 107th Congress, Hilliard's DW-Nominate score was - 0.525, 49th in the House. In the 108th, Davis's score was - 0.286, 167th in the House. (In the last Congress, the 110th, he was still at - 0.286, but thanks to the addition of more Dems, he was down to 184th.)

[ Parent ]
Sorry (displaying my ignorance)
but what is a "DW-Nominate" score?

Indepedent/Lean D. Dude.
All 5s (now TX-5; frmly VA-5 and CA-5)  


[ Parent ]
The standard ideological metric for Congresscritters
Davis had a very similar ideological profile for the past three Congresses, and that profile is far to the right of his predecessor (and district).

[ Parent ]
More to the point
Fleming's and Figures losses where in 2008 and which mirrored Obama's performance. With regard to impact on Bobby Bright, Parker Griffith and Travis Childers, I think each was kinda on its own. Increased black turnout may have helped Bright win but his opponent, Jay Love, was pretty crappy either way. Griffith and Childer's district is whiter but CHilder's won in an off yeear amid regional differences and a bad GOP nominee, while Griffith probably did well b/c he was a long time state senator wholly in AL-5. In any case, any increase will help these guys but I doubt much Davis coattails. As i think these Reps have to win on their own.

Indepedent/Lean D. Dude.
All 5s (now TX-5; frmly VA-5 and CA-5)  


[ Parent ]
Griffith
IIRC he had only been a State Senator for two years.

[ Parent ]
Griffith won because northern Alabama is traditionally Democratic
Republicans have never held the district (except for two years during Reconstruction), and most of the state legislators in the district are still Democrats. In addition, Republicans put up a poor candidate in Wayne Parker, a generic business type who had lost to Bud Cramer twice in the 90s.

I'm willing to predict that Parker Griffith will be the last Democrat to hold AL-05, though. The residual goodwill towards Democrats in pockets of the Deep South seems to be dissipating quickly.


[ Parent ]
I predict that 2008
will be the last year that the Dems win this district for a long while.  I think Griffith will lose in 2010.

[ Parent ]
Same here
I still think Dem losses will won't be too severe, so long as health care reform is passed (about 15-20 house seats lost).  But I get the feeling the losses will not be uniform.  The deep south will see more than their share of Dem defeats.  My guess is we're more likely to see both Bright and Griffith lose than both win in Alabama.  Southern Dem congressmen elected to republican territory are going to have a very bad year.

These Blue Dogs really have nothing to run on.  Democrats will be pissed and likely stay home because they voted against Obama's entire agenda and republicans won't vote for them no matter how they vote.  


[ Parent ]
I never met you
but I have heard about how people missed you here.

What do you think of my (widely reviled here) theory that 2010 will be a dichotomy, a pro-incumbent or pro-Democratic year outside the South, and a bloodbath worse than 1994 in the South.

I have listed 31 Southern/border seats, from which I think the GOP will pick up 10-15.  I think it will be no more than a net pickup of 5 outside these 31.


[ Parent ]
The 31 seats
which are Southern/border seats which are not majority black/Hispanic or in safe urban areas.

MO-4
WV-1
WV-3
MD-1
VA-2
VA-5
VA-9
KY-6
TN-4
TN-6
TN-8
NC-2
NC-7
NC-8
NC-11
SC-5
FL-2
FL-8
FL-24
GA-8
GA-12
AL-2
AL-5
MS-1
MS-4
LA-3
TX-17
OK-2
AR-1
AR-2
AR-4


[ Parent ]
That is a good assessment
I say the bulk of losses come from those 31 seats you mention.  To be more precise I think the bulk will come from the newly elected (2006/2008) Dems or open seats.  I do not see folks like Skelton or Gene Taylor losing under any circumstance.  They survived the worst years of the 1994-2006 republican era.  They should survive 2010 rather easily.

The one factor I think a lot of the people estimating huge republican gains are overlooking is retirements.  1994 was an epic failure in large part due to the unusually large number of Dem retirements that year in very red districts.  So far we are seeing very few Dem retirements.  And most retirements thus far are from Dems running for higher office who represent blue districts.  

According to Charlie Cook only 7 Dems have announced they are leaving their seats open in 2010.  Of those only LA-03, PA-07 and NH-02 are truely competitive, with LA-03 the only truely tough hold.  On the other hand republicans have 12 open seats with DE-AL, IL-10 and PA-06 golden pickup opportunities and FL-12 an outside shot at a pickup.  I also have a strong feeling Young will still retire from FL-10.  

Sorry, but I don't see repubs picking up more than 20'ish seats barring an avalanche of late Dem retirements in early 2010.  


[ Parent ]
I'm going to write a diary one of these days
about how I rate these 31 seats.  I don't agree that Skelton is not vulnerable.  The GOP has finally put up some opposition that isn't complete garbage against him.  I think the seat is a tossup.

The big surprise to a lot of people will be VA-9.  Boucher has never gotten any real opposition.  I predict that there is no more than a 30-40% that he will be back even against a second stringer.  His cap-and-trade vote is going to end his career.

I think some of these Dems in the rural South who were thought to be safe will be gone in 2011.


[ Parent ]
They are clearly vulnerable
But I still think you are writing entrenched people off way too quickly. In no way is Skelton a tossup. Boucher neither. Might they lose? I suppose anything is possible but I see little evidence yet other than wild speculation.

[ Parent ]
My view
Davis can't beat any Repub, even Roy Moore.  No black Democrat can get elected Gov of Alabama, IMO.  A black Repub may be able to, if they can get 25% of the black vote.

Sparks, I think would also lose to any Repub except Roy Moore, in which case I think it would be a tossup.


[ Parent ]
Alabama GOP Gubernatorial Candidates
How would you rate the GOP candidates running for Alabama governor?  From the little I've heard, Bradley Byrne seems to be the best one due to his experience with the state education system and the state legislature along with not having the ethical baggage associated with other candidates.  

[ Parent ]
It's my understanding...
Davis supports a healthcare reform package, but he has hesitations about burdening businesses with employer mandates as it would discourage job growth.  I think he supports the Senate version and hopes he can vote for the final.

As for Sparks - recently he said he was for the public option, as he thinks it's the politically expidient route to siphoning votes from Davis.  But just a couple months ago, Sparks said he was totally opposed to the bill.  Sparks has a history of saying different things to different audiences and Davis has capitalized on it.  The health care bill is no different.  

Blogger Mooncat has a good review: http://www.leftinalabama.com/d...  


[ Parent ]
Sucking up to McConnell
There are some reasons why a candidate should pledge support to Mitch McConnell but none of them trump the idea that every candidate and every voter should cast their support for the best ideas and the best person for the job.  

If Jim DeMint has a better set of positions, they why would Rand Paul want to support McConnell?


McConnell is a Republican from Kentucky
Any senator (from the same party) should be backing their home state senator for leadership positions for the simple fact that it is good for the state.
Plus, if you are in a tight primary, you would think that you would support somebody that your primary voters like a great deal.  I would be shocked if most Kentucky republicans don't support McConnell in his role in leadership

26, D, MO-05, Hispanic

[ Parent ]
I STILL LIKE DAVIS
AS A COMPROMISE SUPREME COURT NOMINEE IF ONE OF THE CONSERVATIVE FIVE RETIRE...HE'S YOUNG, A SKILLED LAWYER AND HAS A POLITICAL BACKGROUND THAT IS LACKING ON THE COURT.

Yo.
Please don't type in all-caps.

[ Parent ]
If Clarence Thomas dies
(I doubt he would retire on his own), I would nominate the most liberal black I could find and dare the GOP to block him/her.

[ Parent ]
hopefully her
we should be nominating women until there are at least 4 on the bench.  Then we can start going more with who tickles our fancy.

[ Parent ]
Lani Guinier would be my choice then
Let's stick it to the GOP.

[ Parent ]
A highly qualified black female liberal Justice
Kill a couple birds with one stone.

[ Parent ]
I'm fine with alternating women and men
and think the next pick should go to Harold Koh - then maybe Elena Kagen.

[ Parent ]
That
Or nominate Anita Hill.

[ Parent ]
Hill is a lot more conservative
than we want.  She was a professor at Oral Roberts, a religious right school.

[ Parent ]
It still bugs the hell out of me
That Thomas was appointed to the legendary Thurgood Marshall's seat.  It would only be fitting to place a solid liberal justice in that seat after the disaster that is Clarence Thomas.

[ Parent ]
Too old IMO
Alan Page is already 64.

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox